• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Iran's Cop Killer Bullets (1 Viewer)

Goobieman

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 2, 2006
Messages
17,343
Reaction score
2,876
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
If GWB had not issued out troops with such high-quality body armor, the Iranians would not have to do this. Damn that GWB!!

Iran's Cop Killer Bullets
August 29, 2006: Iran recently announced that it has begun manufacturing, and issuing armor piercing bullets for the AK-47 type assault rifles used by their infantry. Iran claimed that these new bullets could penetrate protective vests [-- b]ut the ceramic plates used in American protective vests can stop at least one of these armor piercing bullets. These more expensive bullets have to be fired at close range (under a hundred meters) and in large quantity to guarantee they will overwhelm the body armor typically worn by American troops. However, if any American troops do get hit by this new Iranian ammunition, it will cause a stink that may prove expensive to the Iranians. The new Iranian bullets will, however, penetrate most protective vests worn by police.

http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htweap/articles/20060829.aspx
 
Gill said:
I believe these would violate the Geneva Convention.

Its legal to shoot AP at people. You cannot shoot them with frangible or deformable munitions; AP is neither.

(As if Iran, or the liberal left, would care of any such violation).
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom