• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Iranians See Victory, Hope for New Image in Nuclear Agreement

Μολὼν λαβέ;1064518153 said:
Obama is letting the cat out of the bag, not a Republican president. I don't know what's so difficult to understand about that either.

Assuming they don't go nuke before 2017, the GOP will have to deal with the Iran problem. Are you also admitting defeat, or are you making pre-dudes?
 
You have to ask? Bomb the **** out of them, of course.

And when they retaliate against Israel?

When exactly did Bush do that, and what makes makes you think his brother will?
 

Their complaint is well known, "US is Satan and Israel is the little Satan" and we are not dead, though they do hope for it as they have a national "Death to America" holiday, so spare us your laughable propaganda made for Western audiences who are actually allowed to watch UN speeches (Iranians under their theocratic fascist regime are not allowed to watch said speeches) so save your nonsense for the Press TV comment sections pal because nobody here is buying it.

Iran has gone along this far because of a fondness for America & the American people.

OMFG your laughable dribble is nauseating.

Throughout the existence of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the slogan has formed a pillar of its revolutionary values.[4]some believe,This slogan was born due to inappropriate behavior and proceedings of U.S. administration toward Iran which result in Iranian's hatred of America.[10] It is regularly chanted at Friday prayers and other public events, which is often accompanied by a burning of the flag of the United States.[5] These events include the November 4 anniversary of the U.S. embassy seizure, which Iranian leaders declared in 1987 as a national holiday called "Death to America Day."[11] State-sponsored murals that feature the slogan "Death to America" are common in Iranian cities, particularly Tehran.[12]

On March 21, 2015, Iran's supreme leader Ali Khamenei backed and shouted the phrase 'Death to America' while addressing a public gathering in Iran.[13][14][15]


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_to_America

Quit while you are behind sport. Death to the Mullahs and their fascist internet propagandists.
 
Last edited:
The Iranian situation is all of our doing. If you will recall, more than a decade ago we knew without a doubt that Iran wasn't going to give up nuclear ambitions because we asked them to or threatened them. The only way it was going to stop would be to go to war. We knew we weren't going to go to war with Iran yet we told the world we would never allow Iran to have nuclear weapons, knowing full well that we would. Empty threats from a super power are a very stupid idea. Way back then we should have left Iran alone or gone to war. We didn't do either. Now we are looking like fools for being a superpower and not behaving like one. It is time for us to withdraw from the whole thing and learn to keep our mouths shut in the future. Sword rattlers should be fired publicly.

It is beyond belief that a country full of people smart enough to have become the richest and most powerful country can behave so stupidly in international affairs and develop a government with world class incompetence. Yet we do it time and again. We should be fired as the global police department. Let the Chinese take a swing at it.
 



so "open access for UN inspectors, cept these few places"?


lol
 
so "open access for UN inspectors, cept these few places"?


lol

Lets try this again: "The problem with this, is that access to military sites (AKA the PMDS, Possible Military Dimensions) of Iran were never part of the P5+1 talks.... They are being handled directly by the IAEA, and Iran has provided 3 of the 5 areas to their PMD's.. It also doesnt help that the US military has stated that Iran gave up its military nuclear program in 2003."
 



2 areas..... why are 2 areas "off limits"?


If their goal is peaceful use of nuclear power, and the lifting of sanctions, why restrict those 2 areas?



And should we deal with them at all until this is fixed?


http://news.yahoo.com/report-washington-post-reporter-facing-espionage-charges-153601391.html
 
2 areas..... why are 2 areas "off limits"?
The two areas which the IAEA and Iran have not made an agreement on is information and explanations related to studies made and/or papers published in Iran in relation to neutron transport, and explosive tests. https://www.armscontrol.org/ACT/2014_10/News/IAEA-Reports-Delay-in-Iran-Probe



And should we deal with them at all until this is fixed?


Report: US reporter held in Iran facing 'espionage' charges

Completely irrelevant because "we" are not negotiating with Iran in the area just discussed, the IAEA is.
 





So, when you claimed you supported "open inspections" you meant "partial".
 
wait, are we negotiating military build up or not, you are all over the place....

Nope I am not. There are two negotiations going on. The P5+1 talks, and then there is Iran-IAEA talks. The IEAE-Iran talks are separate. The IAEA and Iran greed to resolve PMD investigation in a step by step manner.
 
Nope I am not. There are two negotiations going on. The P5+1 talks, and then there is Iran-IAEA talks. The IEAE-Iran talks are separate. The IAEA and Iran greed to resolve PMD investigation in a step by step manner.


*sigh*


It's all the same in the end, either we have access or not. and if not, is that enough to allow them to expand thier nuclear programs and help them militarize thier country moreso than it is already.
 
*sigh*


It's all the same in the end, either we have access or not. and if not, is that enough to allow them to expand thier nuclear programs and help them militarize thier country moreso than it is already.

Its working to the same goal. Openness, transparency, and accountability. Are they the same? No.
 

____________________

You haven't & couldn't credibly support one of your mistaken and / or false assertions many of which are based on false translations.


As far as a propensity for aggression, Iran has attacked no one in 300 years while Prime Minister Menachem Begin admitted that Israel started 3 of its Wars in a speech to the Israeli National Defense College on Aug. 8, 1982,

Since then Israel has repeatedly attacked Gaza & S. Lebanon using its frequently used "Provoke-then-Smash" strategy:


"Our strategy was always to provoke the Arabs and get an appropriate response so we could attack and smash them".
[Israeli General Moshe Dayan; diaries]
Not so Happy New Year! New Years (p49)


As far as being a future threat to the Region, Israel is currently in the process of executing its Oded Yinon Plan

Show where Iran has developed a similar, aggressive plan for the Region.
 
Double BS.

1. That's a Mischaracterization of Begins speech:
1982 M Begin Speech.
NY Times:
EXCERPTS FROM BEGIN SPEECH AT NATIONAL DEFENSE COLLEGE - NYTimes.com
The War of Independence

"I will explain why: We had Three wars which we fought withOut an alternative.
The first was the war of independence, which began on Nov. 30, 1947, and lasted until January 1949...."


2. Iran has only had it's Radical Revolutionary Govt since 1979. "300 Years" is Irrelevant and intentionally Obtuse.
Iran is involved in Several PROXY Wars (Incl Attacking Israel with Hezbollah), and controls 4 Middle East Capitals.

I believe I have already Busted you on the Above BS Previously.

I can't find a SINGLE Legitimate source for this quote.
All Google entries are Forum posts or the few Conspiracy websites they're copying. (like the crap you linked to.)
 
Last edited:

______________________
A source can be credible without having C.A.M.E.R.A.'s imprimatur & being on their "Approved" list

You're welcome to decide which irrefutable Facts are "is Irrelevant[/u] and intentionally Obtuse", just don't expect me to waste my time responding

I've repeatedly explained that there are many "Players" in the Region other than Iran. Hezbollah is only considered a "Terrorist" by 3 countries in the World

You've obviously omitted passages where Begin admitted "....we had a choice....we attacked him (Nasser) etc.

Again, I'm not going to respond, again to your uncivil & distorted tantrums
 
You keep saying/LYING that "you're not going to respond" but keep doing so to the INADEQUATE degree you can; as above.

This has nothing to do with CAMERA, though they have/anyone can also bust this.
Your every post with a BS quote from equally Absurd Conspiracy/Hate Website.
I posted large portions from a 1982 NYT article.
You posted another JoosDidIt.bs

You were blown AGAIN in Your nonsensical "300 years claim" in defense of the "36 year old Radical Ayatollah Govt." that IS engaged in multiple Proxy Wars.

Then, when challenged, you have NO real source for the Dayan quote.. either!
Cause there is none.

You Not only Lose, your show Disingenuous intent with these continued attempts at misleading the board even after being Refuted.
and you do so with the Every Wack-Job Bigot site on the internet.
 
Last edited:
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…