IPCC Putting in the Fix

[Jack Hays]

[h=2]IPCC: Fixing the Facts[/h] Sep 30, 2013 – 10:59 PM
Figure 1.4 of the Second Order Draft clearly showed the discrepancy between models and observations, though IPCC’s covering text reported otherwise. I discussed this in a post leading up to the IPCC Report, citing Ross McKitrick’s article in National Post and Reiner Grundmann’s post at Klimazweiberl. Needless to say, this diagram did not survive. Instead, IPCC replaced the damning (but accurate) diagram with a new diagram in which the inconsistency has been disappeared.
Read More »eace

 

[flogger]

[h=2]IPCC: Fixing the Facts[/h] Sep 30, 2013 – 10:59 PM
Figure 1.4 of the Second Order Draft clearly showed the discrepancy between models and observations, though IPCC’s covering text reported otherwise. I discussed this in a post leading up to the IPCC Report, citing Ross McKitrick’s article in National Post and Reiner Grundmann’s post at Klimazweiberl. Needless to say, this diagram did not survive. Instead, IPCC replaced the damning (but accurate) diagram with a new diagram in which the inconsistency has been disappeared.
Read More »eace

And you are surprised by this ?

 

[Jack Hays]

And you are surprised by this ?

I am a simple servant of the data.:mrgreen:

 

[polgara]

[h=2]IPCC: Fixing the Facts[/h] Sep 30, 2013 – 10:59 PM
Figure 1.4 of the Second Order Draft clearly showed the discrepancy between models and observations, though IPCC’s covering text reported otherwise. I discussed this in a post leading up to the IPCC Report, citing Ross McKitrick’s article in National Post and Reiner Grundmann’s post at Klimazweiberl. Needless to say, this diagram did not survive. Instead, IPCC replaced the damning (but accurate) diagram with a new diagram in which the inconsistency has been disappeared.
Read More »eace

Making data such as diagrams "disappear," and replacing it with something else that removes discrepancies which make your agenda look questionable? Hmmm...must be a new type of Science being tested here that's potentially worth billions of dollars. I wonder what it will be called?

Good evening, Jack. :2wave:

 

[Jack Hays]

Making data such as diagrams "disappear," and replacing it with something else that removes discrepancies which make your agenda look questionable? Hmmm...must be a new type of Science being tested here that's potentially worth billions of dollars. I wonder what it will be called?

Good evening, Jack. :2wave:

Excellent question.

Good evening, Polgara.:2wave: