- Joined
- Mar 7, 2011
- Messages
- 44,814
- Reaction score
- 20,221
- Location
- A very blue state
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Whats the reasoning for disagreeing with such decision?
Because some people are against everything.
Whats the reasoning for disagreeing with such decision?
There is no good reason to oppose Tubman's appearance on the $20 bill. Unless King is a time traveler or is immortal and therefore knows something insidious about Tubman that we do not.
Why does this make him an asshole?
How would I know. You would have to ask him. But you didn't do that, you just called him an asshole because he didn't bow to the liberal emotional blackmail. For my part, I would rather see Frederick Douglass or MLK on the $20 if that is the direction we are going.
Whatever his reasons are for wanting to block this - he has evidence that she tortured puppies, he wanted Billy Graham on the $20 bill, his underwear is too tight, whatthe****ever - this goes to the heart of the problems in our country. Who CARES who is on the $20 bill? She is as good a choice as anyone. This is the biggest worry in our country today? This clown should be voted out of office.
I want to move to Switzerland.
You'd have to learn how to Yodel.
What makes you think I don't already know how to yodel? I watched The Sound Of Music about 37846 times. Yodelay yodelay yodelay hee hoo!
Looks like a life of swiss cheese, swiss chocolate, and Swiss Miss is in your future.
I've already started braiding my hair and wearing my liederhosen.
There's rumors she put ketchup on her scrambled eggs.
Page 21, line 16, strike ‘‘$1’’ and insert ‘‘any’’.
Page 21, line 16, insert ‘‘or coin’’ after ‘‘note’’.
13 SEC. 119. None of the funds appropriated in this Act
14 or otherwise available to the Department of the Treasury
15 or the Bureau of Engraving and Printing may be used
16 to redesign the $1 Federal Reserve note.
Whatever his reasons are for wanting to block this - he has evidence that she tortured puppies, he wanted Billy Graham on the $20 bill, his underwear is too tight, whatthe****ever - this goes to the heart of the problems in our country. Who CARES who is on the $20 bill? She is as good a choice as anyone. This is the biggest worry in our country today? This clown should be voted out of office.
I want to move to Switzerland.
One of the most salient and simultaneously damning things about our country.
The lunatics in Congress reflect the electorate who put them there.
I would like to see a source for this that it costs "a couple hundred million each to redesign each bill".. All I could find was this, "How much money does all of this cost? The government already regularly redesigns bills and introduces new notes into circulation. So it’s not clear that redesigning the displays on the back and front create much more work. The real cost of issuing currency is in the security and anticounterfeiting technology that officials must constantly police." Q&A: Harriet Tubman, Alexander Hamilton and the Currency Redesign - Real Time Economics - WSJ The only expense I can think of in replacing Jackson with Tubman is a new printing plate, which is pretty trivial..If I were to guess, given the amendment's language, he's trying to keep the Treasury from redesigning money every couple of years. We just finished our last redesign phase, and if I remember correctly each bill's redesign and circulation process costs a couple hundred million each.
Yea. Thus nullyfying the decision to put Tubman on the $20 bill...This is the extent of his amendment.
And here is the paragraph requesting to be altered(with line numbers)
I would like to see a source for this that it costs "a couple hundred million each to redesign each bill".. All I could find was this, "How much money does all of this cost? The government already regularly redesigns bills and introduces new notes into circulation. So it’s not clear that redesigning the displays on the back and front create much more work. The real cost of issuing currency is in the security and anticounterfeiting technology that officials must constantly police." Q&A: Harriet Tubman, Alexander Hamilton and the Currency Redesign - Real Time Economics - WSJ The only expense I can think of in replacing Jackson with Tubman is a new printing plate, which is pretty trivial..
Yea. Thus nullyfying the decision to put Tubman on the $20 bill...
Read more @: Iowa congressman wants to block $20 Tubman
He is at least a ****ing asshole.... [/FONT][/COLOR]
If I were to guess, given the amendment's language, he's trying to keep the Treasury from redesigning money every couple of years. We just finished our last redesign phase, and if I remember correctly each bill's redesign and circulation process costs a couple hundred million each.
This is the extent of his amendment.
And here is the paragraph requesting to be altered(with line numbers)
"It's not about Harriet Tubman, it's about keeping the picture on the $20," King said Tuesday night, according to Politico, pulling a $20 bill from his pocket and pointing at President Andrew Jackson. "Y'know? Why would you want to change that? I am a conservative, I like to keep what we have."
Politico quoted King as saying it is "racist" and "sexist" to say a woman or person of color should be added to currency.
"Here's what's really happening, this is liberal activism on the part of the president, that's trying to identify people by categories and he's divided us on the lines of groups. … This is a divisive proposal on the part of the president and mine's unifying. It says just don't change anything."
And you would be wrong. The reason is...surprise surprise..."liberal activism."
Steve King won't be blocking Harriet Tubman from $20 bill
Of course you can't just come right out and say "We don't want no darkies on our money" so you go with every racist dog whistle in your bag.
"It's racist and sexist to put a black woman on the twenty dollar bill." You had a whole day to come up with a coherent response and that's what you decides to go with. Good one, Steve King, good one.
In addition, the amendment would have reportedly prevented the United States Mint from complying with the America’s Beautiful National Parks Quarter Dollar Coin Act of 2008. This law requires the Mint to issue five new quarter-dollar coins each year featuring designs depicting national parks and other national sites. It would also negatively affect the Native American $1 Coin Act, which requires the minting and issuance of $1 coins each year featuring designs celebrating the important contributions made by Indian tribes and individual Native Americans to the history and development of the United States.
it would also save money, but I don't understand his reasoning.
Read more @: Iowa congressman wants to block $20 Tubman
He is at least a ****ing asshole.... [/FONT][/COLOR]
i agree taking the man that saved America form another war and replace him with a woman that did what.the people on the left have no prospective,JACKSON might be looked at as a racist in 2016,but he was president in 1829, fyi the 1829 world was not the same as the 2016 world ,prospective they have none.
run don run
You're from Texas, right?Second biggest asshole in all of Congress. Louis Gohmert is number one, though. Everything is bigger in Texas, including assholes. :mrgreen: