Angel
DP Veteran
- Joined
- May 3, 2017
- Messages
- 18,001
- Reaction score
- 2,909
- Location
- New York City
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Yes, I read your post. And I believe you read mine. You simply don't understand what I'm pointing out to you -- and so you don't understand your misunderstanding.You did read my post? Or are you writing without any knowledge about what I wrote?
I stated that atheism and agnostic are not the same thing, or did you not understand that little snippet?
I am an atheist, there are no gods, period.
I am not an agnostic because agnostic just say they do not know whether or not a god exists, it may but it may not. Hence the difference between atheists and agnostics. Is that so difficult to understand.
And no, my statements about atheism are accurate (look at the definition), it is you who are making a muddled and confused comment.
Third time's the charm. Here goes. Pay attention.
My criticism has nothing to do with agnosticism or what you say about agnosticism or what you say about the difference between agnosticism.
Have you got that? Perhaps re-read that last sentence, yes?
What I;m saying -- for the third time now -- is that your statement about atheism is muddled and confused and erroneous.
Have you got that?
Now re=read my last two replies to you with this clarification in mind, and see whether or not you understand.