• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

"Intelligent Design" Debunked

Jufarius87 said:
regardless of evidence the scientific method lacks the proof nessacary to make evolution fact and until then it is only theory and should be taught as such

Again, you completely misunderstand the scientific method. (This is like the bazillionth time I've had to enlighten a creationist about science. Did you people ditch that day?) You unknowingly sum up the entire "creationism" issue in the beginning of your statement, "regardless of evidence." Regardless of evidence, "creationists" will continue to insist that evolution is "just a theory" and force their religious beliefs where they don't belong.

jufarius87 said:
ya know if public school was abolished we wouldnt be having this problem because sensitive parents on both ends of the spiritual spectrum can simply pick a school that follows their beleifs

We already have private schools where they teach Biblical fairy tales as scientific theory.
 
Gabo said:
:D So so true. People will never all agree, that's just how it is. Let people decide what they want for themselves, and leave government out of it.

There's honest disagreement: "Government can play a beneficial role in the economy," then there's ridiculous, misguided, disingenuous disagreement: "'Creationism' should be taught in a science class."
 
Back
Top Bottom