• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Informative interview with oil executive

Chainsawmassacre

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 11, 2021
Messages
9,694
Reaction score
3,288
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
This guy lays it out very clearly. Despite Biden rhetoric permits to drill are coming in at record slow pace and thousands are ready to go that could be signed tomorrow. He also explains the permit game Biden plays. He permits drilling but not the infrastructure it would take to support the permitted well. Lots more good info too. Worth the watch.



 
This guy lays it out very clearly. Despite Biden rhetoric permits to drill are coming in at record slow pace and thousands are ready to go that could be signed tomorrow. He also explains the permit game Biden plays. He permits drilling but not the infrastructure it would take to support the permitted well. Lots more good info too. Worth the watch.





A video, from Fox "News", of a Big Oil exec.

Triple fail. Next! 👋
 
This guy lays it out very clearly. Despite Biden rhetoric permits to drill are coming in at record slow pace and thousands are ready to go that could be signed tomorrow. He also explains the permit game Biden plays. He permits drilling but not the infrastructure it would take to support the permitted well. Lots more good info too. Worth the watch.
This guy is a liar.
 
This guy lays it out very clearly. Despite Biden rhetoric permits to drill are coming in at record slow pace and thousands are ready to go that could be signed tomorrow. He also explains the permit game Biden plays. He permits drilling but not the infrastructure it would take to support the permitted well. Lots more good info too. Worth the watch.




Wait, we're gonna take the word of the president of the robber barons? In an interview with Faux Niwz?

You can't be serious.
 
Wait, we're gonna take the word of the president of the robber barons? In an interview with Faux Niwz?

You can't be serious.

An entire family of oil corruption

Chris Stewart, climate science denier, is now head of Congressional climate science committee

Chris Stewart, a republican from Utah, was recently appointed Chair of theHouse subcommittee on Science.

This means that Congressman Stewart now has dominion over the EPA, climate change research, and “all activities related to climate.” According to the House Science Committees website, the chair of the energy subcommittee oversees:

“all matters relating to environmental research; Environmental Protection Agency research and development; environmental standards; climate change research and development; the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, including all activities related to weather, weather services, climate, the atmosphere, marine fisheries, and oceanic research;”

Unfortunately for the EPA, NOAA, and anyone worried about climate change,Chris Stewart is a climate science denier. Mr. Stewart believes there is “insufficient science” to determine if climate change is caused by humans. He believes this in spite of the fact that the EPA, NOAA, and all experts in the field (which he now oversees), disagrees with him.

For the record, Chris Stewart has no advanced degrees in science. However, before running for congress he was owner and CEO of Shipley Group, a company that trains government workers on environmental issues. Shipley Group actuallyruns a trainingon climate change science, and according to the Shipley Group website “Upon completion of the workshop, participants will be able to understand basic climate change science.” Clearly Mr. Stewart has never taken his company’s training.

Ties to Fossil Fuels

Though Stewart seems to ignore climate change science (while his company profits by teaching it), he does not ignore the fossil fuel industry. In fact he is quite sympathetic to the plight of oil and gas companies. Hiscampaign websiteclaims:

“I am the CEO of a company that works extensively with independent energy producers. I understand how difficult it is to get a drilling permit on federal lands. It is painfully slow, incoherently arbitrary, and always expensive.”

Stewart’s “extensive” knowledge of the fossil fuel industry is not a surprise. His brother,Tim Stewartis a lobbyist for American Capitol Group, a washington DC lobbying firm. American capitol Grouplobbies for fossil Fuel interests, like theWestern Energy Alliance, a group mainly comprised offracking and oil companies.

Tim Stewart alsolobbied forEnergyNorthAmerica, a company he cofounded to lobby for the Fossil Fuel Industry.

 
An entire family of oil corruption

Chris Stewart, climate science denier, is now head of Congressional climate science committee

Chris Stewart, a republican from Utah, was recently appointed Chair of theHouse subcommittee on Science.

This means that Congressman Stewart now has dominion over the EPA, climate change research, and “all activities related to climate.” According to the House Science Committees website, the chair of the energy subcommittee oversees:

“all matters relating to environmental research; Environmental Protection Agency research and development; environmental standards; climate change research and development; the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, including all activities related to weather, weather services, climate, the atmosphere, marine fisheries, and oceanic research;”

Unfortunately for the EPA, NOAA, and anyone worried about climate change,Chris Stewart is a climate science denier. Mr. Stewart believes there is “insufficient science” to determine if climate change is caused by humans. He believes this in spite of the fact that the EPA, NOAA, and all experts in the field (which he now oversees), disagrees with him.

For the record, Chris Stewart has no advanced degrees in science. However, before running for congress he was owner and CEO of Shipley Group, a company that trains government workers on environmental issues. Shipley Group actuallyruns a trainingon climate change science, and according to the Shipley Group website “Upon completion of the workshop, participants will be able to understand basic climate change science.” Clearly Mr. Stewart has never taken his company’s training.

Ties to Fossil Fuels

Though Stewart seems to ignore climate change science (while his company profits by teaching it), he does not ignore the fossil fuel industry. In fact he is quite sympathetic to the plight of oil and gas companies. Hiscampaign websiteclaims:

“I am the CEO of a company that works extensively with independent energy producers. I understand how difficult it is to get a drilling permit on federal lands. It is painfully slow, incoherently arbitrary, and always expensive.”

Stewart’s “extensive” knowledge of the fossil fuel industry is not a surprise. His brother,Tim Stewartis a lobbyist for American Capitol Group, a washington DC lobbying firm. American capitol Grouplobbies for fossil Fuel interests, like theWestern Energy Alliance, a group mainly comprised offracking and oil companies.

Tim Stewart alsolobbied forEnergyNorthAmerica, a company he cofounded to lobby for the Fossil Fuel Industry.

1649032167728.png
 
An entire family of oil corruption

Chris Stewart, climate science denier, is now head of Congressional climate science committee

Chris Stewart, a republican from Utah, was recently appointed Chair of theHouse subcommittee on Science.

This means that Congressman Stewart now has dominion over the EPA, climate change research, and “all activities related to climate.” According to the House Science Committees website, the chair of the energy subcommittee oversees:

“all matters relating to environmental research; Environmental Protection Agency research and development; environmental standards; climate change research and development; the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, including all activities related to weather, weather services, climate, the atmosphere, marine fisheries, and oceanic research;”

Unfortunately for the EPA, NOAA, and anyone worried about climate change,Chris Stewart is a climate science denier. Mr. Stewart believes there is “insufficient science” to determine if climate change is caused by humans. He believes this in spite of the fact that the EPA, NOAA, and all experts in the field (which he now oversees), disagrees with him.

For the record, Chris Stewart has no advanced degrees in science. However, before running for congress he was owner and CEO of Shipley Group, a company that trains government workers on environmental issues. Shipley Group actuallyruns a trainingon climate change science, and according to the Shipley Group website “Upon completion of the workshop, participants will be able to understand basic climate change science.” Clearly Mr. Stewart has never taken his company’s training.

Ties to Fossil Fuels

Though Stewart seems to ignore climate change science (while his company profits by teaching it), he does not ignore the fossil fuel industry. In fact he is quite sympathetic to the plight of oil and gas companies. Hiscampaign websiteclaims:

“I am the CEO of a company that works extensively with independent energy producers. I understand how difficult it is to get a drilling permit on federal lands. It is painfully slow, incoherently arbitrary, and always expensive.”

Stewart’s “extensive” knowledge of the fossil fuel industry is not a surprise. His brother,Tim Stewartis a lobbyist for American Capitol Group, a washington DC lobbying firm. American capitol Grouplobbies for fossil Fuel interests, like theWestern Energy Alliance, a group mainly comprised offracking and oil companies.

Tim Stewart alsolobbied forEnergyNorthAmerica, a company he cofounded to lobby for the Fossil Fuel Industry.

Threads not about climate change. Apparently you can’t refute anything this guy said so you go off on another subject.
 
Wait, we're gonna take the word of the president of the robber barons? In an interview with Faux Niwz?

You can't be serious.
Feel free to tell us what he lied about
 
This guy lays it out very clearly. Despite Biden rhetoric permits to drill are coming in at record slow pace and thousands are ready to go that could be signed tomorrow. He also explains the permit game Biden plays. He permits drilling but not the infrastructure it would take to support the permitted well. Lots more good info too. Worth the watch.






Did he explain why the royalty on federal lands is 12.5% when states like Texas charge a 25%?
 
An entire family of oil corruption

Chris Stewart, climate science denier, is now head of Congressional climate science committee

Chris Stewart, a republican from Utah, was recently appointed Chair of theHouse subcommittee on Science.

This means that Congressman Stewart now has dominion over the EPA, climate change research, and “all activities related to climate.” According to the House Science Committees website, the chair of the energy subcommittee oversees:

“all matters relating to environmental research; Environmental Protection Agency research and development; environmental standards; climate change research and development; the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, including all activities related to weather, weather services, climate, the atmosphere, marine fisheries, and oceanic research;”

Unfortunately for the EPA, NOAA, and anyone worried about climate change,Chris Stewart is a climate science denier. Mr. Stewart believes there is “insufficient science” to determine if climate change is caused by humans. He believes this in spite of the fact that the EPA, NOAA, and all experts in the field (which he now oversees), disagrees with him.

For the record, Chris Stewart has no advanced degrees in science. However, before running for congress he was owner and CEO of Shipley Group, a company that trains government workers on environmental issues. Shipley Group actuallyruns a trainingon climate change science, and according to the Shipley Group website “Upon completion of the workshop, participants will be able to understand basic climate change science.” Clearly Mr. Stewart has never taken his company’s training.

Ties to Fossil Fuels

Though Stewart seems to ignore climate change science (while his company profits by teaching it), he does not ignore the fossil fuel industry. In fact he is quite sympathetic to the plight of oil and gas companies. Hiscampaign websiteclaims:

“I am the CEO of a company that works extensively with independent energy producers. I understand how difficult it is to get a drilling permit on federal lands. It is painfully slow, incoherently arbitrary, and always expensive.”

Stewart’s “extensive” knowledge of the fossil fuel industry is not a surprise. His brother,Tim Stewartis a lobbyist for American Capitol Group, a washington DC lobbying firm. American capitol Grouplobbies for fossil Fuel interests, like theWestern Energy Alliance, a group mainly comprised offracking and oil companies.

Tim Stewart alsolobbied forEnergyNorthAmerica, a company he cofounded to lobby for the Fossil Fuel Industry.

Thats old news, your link is dates 2013
 
Did he explain why the royalty on federal lands is 12.5% when states like Texas charge a 25%?
Do you realize increased royalty fees would show up at the pump?
 
Do you realize increased royalty fees would show up at the pump?

So we should continue to screw the federal taxpayers? Are you saying the oil companies deserve the welfare?
 
So we should continue to screw the federal taxpayers? Are you saying the oil companies deserve the welfare?
I'd give oil leases for free. Oil is a strategic necessity and a matter of national security. Drill baby drill.
 
I'd give oil leases for free. Oil is a strategic necessity and a matter of national security. Drill baby drill.

I’d be okay with that while returning the export ban that the GQP and oil companies said would strengthen the market. MAGA
 
I’d be okay with that while returning the export ban that the GQP and oil companies said would strengthen the market. MAGA
"Proponents of a U.S. crude oil export ban argue that prohibiting crude oil exports would increase the supply of crude in the United States, allowing refiners to increase their production of gasoline and diesel and lowering the price of these fuels. The implicit premise is that there is enough spare capacity for this light sweet crude oil to be refined in the United States.

One important point this proposal overlooks is that the prices of gasoline and diesel in the United States are determined by their prices in global markets since the U.S. trades diesel and gasoline. Because a cessation of U.S. crude oil exports would lower the supply of oil in global markets and raise its price, one would expect global fuel prices, if anything, to increase as a result. Refiners can always sell these fuels abroad at their global price, so it makes no sense for them to sell for less in the domestic market.

In other words, the prices of gasoline and diesel fuel in the U.S. would not be expected to decline and might actually increase, rendering the crude oil export ban not only ineffective, but also counterproductive. Thus, there is no reason to expect that U.S. consumers would benefit from such a ban.

Banning crude exports, however, would benefit refiners of light sweet crude in the short run because they can buy crude oil that otherwise would have been exported at a discount, while selling fuels at high global prices. This is not merely conjecture. “The Impact of the Shale Oil Revolution on U.S. Oil and Gasoline Prices,” by Lutz Kilian, provides evidence supporting this point from before 2015, when exports of domestically produced crude were largely banned for national security reasons.

The short-run bonanza for U.S. refiners specialized in refining light sweet crude, however, would not last. As the price of domestically produced crude oil declines and storage fills, it would not be long before some domestic oil producers become unprofitable and cease operations."
 
Is there anyone else we can talk to about this, perhaps someone not so vested in big oil goals?
 
Back
Top Bottom