- Joined
- Nov 20, 2013
- Messages
- 16,172
- Reaction score
- 17,693
- Location
- Chi-town
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Liberal
I call total BS, sorry dude. Pence signed the law two days ago. It doesn't go into effect immediately.
Tim-
GOP leaders offer remarks on RFRA
Reporter: “You guys have said repeatedly that we shouldn’t be able to discriminate against anyone, but if you just ignore the existence of this law, can’t we already do that now? Can’t so-and-so in Richmond put a sign up and say ‘No Gays Allowed?’ That’s not against the law, correct?”
Bosma: “It would depend, if you were in a community that had a human rights ordinance that wouldn’t be the case.”
Reporter: “But most of the state does not have that, correct?”
Bosma: “That’s correct.”
99%... can never say 100% but I find it very unlikely even it was Richard Simmons with a "Right Said Fred world tour" t shirt on.. Drs do not allow the injured to go untreated for some political position..
But walk in clinics mayn times are not staffed with the right person at the moment and or equipment.....I just experienced that myself.. I am not gay
Call BS all ya want. I'm relaying what transpired.
again.. quote whats the issue so I can help you.. I cant read minds
to be told you are right..and if its not your post, angle or agenda its incorrect... the usual
Liberals have a mob mentality, something they claim to despise. they gang up on one group(in this case christians) and bully them and make it their mission to ruin the lives of those who disagree. It's the worst kind of attitude and mindset.
ADL Anti-discrimination laws.
That is not correct. For one you have no way of knowing how the law will be applied. As I stated my state is attempting to use the RFRA law to block cities from extending ADL to LGBT persons.
I've read Indiana SB 101...It states that no government entity [city...ect ] may not substantially burden a person's exercise of religion. That means if a city[or any governmental agency] writes LGBT anti-discrimination protections and fines any one or business in violation of those ADL. The person or business could sue and judges would use the state's RFRA as judicial reasoning. That is if the city or other Indiana governmental agency woul;d be sued by the state first.
Indiana 'Anti LGBT' Law Update: SB 101 Clarification Sought By Lawmakers After RFRA Backlash
Gov Pence will never come out and tell the world that LBGT have never had protections in Indiana. He will eventually have to tell the world this law does nothing to protect LGBT persons in Indiana.
OMG Malloy is such an embarrassment. Seriously.
Yes, I'm sure there was a lot of state travel to Indiana for CT government employees. :roll:
OMFG on CT's religious freedom law. OMFG. I should laugh at his ignorance, but I have a lot of friends who still live in CT and I feel sorry for them now.
Malloy needs to get back to his efforts to capitalize on Sandy Hook and leave the lawmaking to the smart people.
From what I'VE seen in this thread, your comments are decidedly one sided... which is not surprising. In this thread, several liberals have over-reacted and taken the law to the extreme. And several conservatives have misrepresented, been blind, and assigned positions that do not apply. The problem here is both sides, as usual.
OMG Malloy is such an embarrassment. Seriously.
Yes, I'm sure there was a lot of state travel to Indiana for CT government employees. :roll:
OMFG on CT's religious freedom law. OMFG. I should laugh at his ignorance, but I have a lot of friends who still live in CT and I feel sorry for them now.
Malloy needs to get back to his efforts to capitalize on Sandy Hook and leave the lawmaking to the smart people.
We are also getting another tax hike after the largest tax hike in state history when he took over. WEEEEEEEEeeee.
Yes, because people who experience righteous anger when losing their human rights are just as bad as people who experience defensive anger when called out for oppressing others' rights. :roll: Epic fail, CC.
We lived in Fairfield County back in the early 1990s. I miss the fun of downtown Stamford. I don't miss the taxes.
the state shouldn't scansion any of those, either.
Judges shouldn't be elected I agree. How do you believe they should get to their respective positions then?
That story in your signature line. Did that news make it to the Netherlands?
We lived in Fairfield County back in the early 1990s. I miss the fun of downtown Stamford. I don't miss the taxes.
"Righteous" is subjective, and you just did precisely what I said. BOTH sides have legitimate positions on this issue. The problem is the application of those issues.
A Muslim business owner can refuse to serve bacon, but they can't refuse to serve bacon to black people but serve bacon to white people anyway. Hope this helps your confusion.
Just don't understand why someone would be so opposed to hunting while making a living selling meat from slaughterhouses. But that's a subject for another thread.Nope, not a vegetarian restaurant. She, like I, loves animals and doesn't appreciate jokes about animals being made into meat.
You're the one who claimed "you can deny service to anyone for any reason"She can't say "You have to leave because I don't like black people". Black people are of the protected class. Have you been following along?
State public accommodations laws - which is why I say things like "typically," "usually," and "most if not all" because I don't know the law in every state.What are the laws that say you can't deny service for purely arbitrary reasons? If I own a cleaning service, and I clean the house next to you, what law says I have to clean your house just because you want me to if I decide I don't want to do it because you have kids and I don't like kids? That's arbitrary.
Arbitrarily jettisoning those that you don't like the looks off from a business that serves the public isn't freedom. That's some nazi era ****.
I can't believe any of those guys picked it up. I live in NH and it got about 6 seconds mention on our news channels and barely a mention in our newspapers.
Nobody I know of cared that he used a discussion about our state bird in such a manner. It was how something proposed by kids was hijacked for political purposes - by both sides, by the way.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?