• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

In shootings, is the gun to blame?

Josie

*probably reading smut*
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 25, 2010
Messages
57,606
Reaction score
32,117
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
Here ya go. Why would you blame an inanimate object?

It goes back to the nature/nurture debate which the left lost a long time ago. In short, the political left believes your environment, and not you, is responsible for what you are. Hence capitalism makes people greedy, socialism makes people selfless, and putting a gun in your hand makes you want to shoot other people.
 
Here ya go. Why would you blame an inanimate object?

Mary is technically correct, but the type of gun matters. If the gun is an automatic rifle, it is to blame when too many bullets come out in quick succession and a stray bullet kills someone despite the shooter not intending to do that.
 
Mary is technically correct, but the type of gun matters. If the gun is an automatic rifle, it is to blame when too many bullets come out in quick succession and a stray bullet kills someone despite the shooter not intending to do that.

Really? A gun can get up on it's own and shoot bullets?
 
What is it about guns and guys under 18 that trigger you?
 
Fault can't be put onto inanimate objects. They can't make decisions.

Of course they can't. It is always the shooter's fault that he used a gun and bullets came out of it.

But those automatic rifles that do not require a trigger . . .
 
We obviously need to remove people's right to arms...and I mean that literally. We need to amputate people's arms because fists kill more people.

Nonsense. The Second Amendment reads people have the right to "keep and bear arms" and your literal arms are what you need to carry something.

If fists kill more people than guns, why do people use guns instead of their bare hands for self defense?
 
i think everyone will have this conversation for the millionth time and nothing will change.

around 40 more days until the next high profile mass shooting (not counting the daily mass shootings).
 
Of course they can't. It is always the shooter's fault that he used a gun and bullets came out of it.

But those automatic rifles that do not require a trigger . . .

Please tell us more about these guns that don't require someone pulling a trigger.
 
Back
Top Bottom