Unfortunately, there are those who do not care about women's health, choices, or rights.
What would such laws look like? Where is the line of "common sense?"
Or men's for that matter.
Common sense? Civil Rights are never allowed in nations such as Russia, China, N. Korea and other nations that are not of the people, by the people, for the people. Today we are facing another attack by autocrats, such as many of the Republican Governors and leaders in RED State Legislatures.
How so?
Don't deflect with meaningless double talk or partisan nonsense. What would be "common sense" abortion laws.
Possibly. But when the issue involves abortion, it's solely a matter of women's health.
That we currently have.
Yep. That's what we thought, too. Then the Republicans, being led by the nose by the Religious right crusaders said, "Hold my beer".
Is the donor the one getting pregnant? What rights does he not have exactly?
The sperm donor is on the hook for supporting the child even if he didn’t want one. Even if she said atbthe time she didn’t want one either. His financial future is subject to her decision making and her’s alone.
That occurs after birth and is an issue of child rearing. The abortion issue is about child bearing.
That's still vague. Specify what such a law would look like!
The decision to keep the child happens before birth and the male has no say in it. You asked what right if his isn’t respected and there it is. His right to not have a child.
As I've said before, when he gets pregnant, then he'll have a say.
That’s a childish dodge. He doesn’t have to get pregnant to have an interest in the outcome.
If he's not pregnant, he has no say, plain and simple. One one gets to dictate the health or personal decisions of another.
