That would be Biden, who lost his mind.
Will it be as comical as Green Acres?
Does someone have to be convicted of a crime to get your attention?
You keep using the word "evidence". There is no evidence here. You can't name a specific crime that was committed, nor how anything in this money making scam of a video is in any way evidence of anything at all.
I will contend that what they have gathered warrants being submitted, in full, to the proper State Authorities as subpoenaed to the furtherance of those active investigations.
Not yet it isn't, true.
Well they have shown ample interesting information but I think if they answer the subpoenas as the authorities have issued we might just move from "interesting" to "probable cause".
I am a person who acknowledges that as long as TTV and Engelbrecht and Phillips et al SIT ON IT i.e. what data they are promoting in the 2000 Mules movie and on/in every Right wing venue they can in furtherance of feathering their financial bottom lines, well then what they have IS MEANINGLESS.
My mind is open to real facts that are presented to real investigative bodies and then put through the proper processing.
I suggest you look up the definition "evidence."
Yep, just checked and it still means the same thing. So again, there is no evidence of anything at all in this money making scam of a video. You can't name any crime that was or could have been committed, nor how anything in the video would be evidence of any crime.
Hi. Feeling better today?Good Morning bubbagone!
"The Center for Technology and Civic Life, funded by Facebook boss Mark Zuckerberg and founded by three Democratic operatives, said their mission was to ensure voting could be “done in accordance with prevailing public health requirements” to “reduce the risk of exposure to coronavirus.”
But really they were infiltrating local election operations and pushing for as many Democrats as possible to vote by mail."
...
"... even though state law says that the city clerk is in charge of the election, Democratic Green Bay Mayor Eric Genrich gave CTCL leadership roles in collecting absentee ballots, fixing ballots that would otherwise be voided for failure to follow the law, and even supervising the counting of ballots."
...
“As far as I’m concerned I am taking all of my cues from CTCL and work with those you recommend,” Celestine Jeffreys, the chief of staff to mayor Genrich, wrote in an e-mail."
...
"A few weeks after the cities received their grant, CTCL e-mailed Claire Woodall-Vogg, the executive director of the Milwaukee Election Commission, to offer “an experienced elections staffer that could potentially embed with your staff in Milwaukee in a matter of days.”
The staffer leading Wisconsin’s portion of the National Vote at Home Institute was an out-of-state Democratic activist named Michael Spitzer-Rubenstein. As soon as he met with Woodall-Vogg, he asked for contacts at the Wisconsin Elections Commission and in the other cities.
Spitzer-Rubenstein would eventually take over much of Green Bay’s election planning from the official charged with running the election, Green Bay city clerk Kris Teske."
...
"E-mails from Spitzer-Rubenstein show he was managing much of the election process. To one government official he wrote, “By Monday, I’ll have our edits on the absentee voting instructions. We’re pushing Quickbase to get their system up and running and I’ll keep you updated. I’ll revise the planning tool to accurately reflect the process. I’ll create a flowchart for the vote-by-mail processing that we will be able to share with both inspectors and also observers.”
Once early voting started, Woodall-Vogg would provide him with a daily update on the numbers of absentee ballots returned and still outstanding in each ward, prized information for a political operative.
“Here’s what I’ll need,” Spitzer-Rubenstein wrote to her in late October, “1) Number of ballot preparation teams, 2) Number of returned ballots per ward, 3) Number of outstanding ballots per ward.”
How Zuck’s Bucks helped flip Wisconsin for Joe Biden after Hillary’s 2016 defeat
Wisconsin shocked the Hillary Clinton campaign when it went for Donald Trump in 2016, after having voted for Barack Obama in two elections. Democrats were intent that it not go red again. To ensure…nypost.com
D'Souza offended people. He had to be taken down.
D'Souza shot himself in the foot when he KNOWINGLY and then ADMITTEDLY severely violated Campaign Finance Law.
He's still more honorable than most politicians in DC.D'Souza shot himself in the foot when he KNOWINGLY and then ADMITTEDLY severely violated Campaign Finance Law.
No one did any takedown of him but himself.
So much for being "taken down" though, the felon didn't even serve time but got a few years probation and later a "Mr. Law and Order" hypocrite Trump pardon.
I hope you don't believe in any of them.No he isn't.
He has no honor.
Gave campaign money to a friend. Zuckerberg can spend multimillions influencing an election.
He committed a felony by claiming the money he gave the ‘friend’ was from others, directly violating campaign laws. He did it knowingly and deliberately, and covered up his tracks because he knew it was illegal.
You make it sound so benign.
Preet Bharara, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced today that DINESH D’SOUZA was sentenced in Manhattan federal court to five years of probation, with eight months during the first year to be served in a community confinement center, after having pled guilty to violating the federal campaign election law by making illegal contributions to a United States Senate campaign in the names of others. D’SOUZA was sentenced today before U.S. District Judge Richard M. Berman.
In 2012, the Election Act limited campaign contributions to $5,000 from any individual to any one candidate. In March 2012, D’SOUZA contributed $10,000 to the Senate campaign of Wendy Long on behalf of himself and his wife, agreeing in writing to attribute that contribution as $5,000 from his wife and $5,000 from him. In August 2012, D’SOUZA directed other individuals with whom he was associated, namely his assistant and a woman with whom D’SOUZA was romantically involved (the “Straw Donors”), to make contributions to Wendy Long’s campaign for the United States Senate (the “Long Campaign”) on behalf of themselves and their spouses that totaled $20,000 with the promise that he would reimburse them for the contributions. Later that same day or the next day, D’SOUZA, as promised, reimbursed the Straw Donors $10,000 each in cash for the contributions. When confronted by Ms. Long, D’SOUZA initially misled the candidate before admitting what he had done.
During the plea proceeding, D’SOUZA admitted before the Court that he caused two close associates to contribute $10,000 each to the Long Campaign with the understanding that he would reimburse them for their contributions and that he did reimburse them. D’SOUZA also admitted that he knew that what he was doing was wrong and something the law forbids.
Dinesh D’Souza Sentenced in Manhattan Federal Court to Five Years of Probation for Campaign Finance Fraud — FBI
Preet Bharara, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced today that DINESH DSOUZA was sentenced in Manhattan federal court to five years of probation, with eight months during the first year to be served in a community confinement center, after having pled...www.fbi.gov