I guess dropping off medication is not enough, we now have to send our troops to face possible death.
If you were ordered to go by the president, would you follow orders, or would you say no and face a dishonorable discharge?
I guess dropping off medication is not enough, we now have to send our troops to face possible death.
If you were ordered to go by the president, would you follow orders, or would you say no and face a dishonorable discharge?
I guess dropping off medication is not enough, we now have to send our troops to face possible death.
If you were ordered to go by the president, would you follow orders, or would you say no and face a dishonorable discharge?
I would do my duty, obviously.
Anyone who refused such an order should be court martialed.
I guess dropping off medication is not enough, we now have to send our troops to face possible death.
If you were ordered to go by the president, would you follow orders, or would you say no and face a dishonorable discharge?
I agree. Only someone who had little or nothing to do with the military would contemplate on disobeying it. Besides, those that go will be medical personal who are specially qualified along with the equipment to handle the situation.
I guess dropping off medication is not enough, we now have to send our troops to face possible death.
If you were ordered to go by the president, would you follow orders, or would you say no and face a dishonorable discharge?
Now a GOP congressman is asking for money from the ACA fund for ebola.
After Boehner's cheap shot at Obama for waiting too long.
Never mind the quarter billion Obama has already spent on ebola.
As FOX plays politics with our troops going to Liberia.
And you wonder why I watch FOX right now with the "Special Report",
and then report their treachory Fair, Balanced and Unafraid .
I guess dropping off medication is not enough, we now have to send our troops to face possible death.
If you were ordered to go by the president, would you follow orders, or would you say no and face a dishonorable discharge?
No question about it - do my duty.
Anyone that refuses to go should be court martialed.
I've been given some pretty hard orders to follow in my carreer, but never thought twice about following them to the letter.
"Fight" the virus how, exactly?[/I]
They have guns.... they use them.
While I am sure you were never given illegal orders... surely soldiers think about the morality of orders if they are questionable?
Now a GOP congressman is asking for money from the ACA fund for ebola.
After Boehner's cheap shot at Obama for waiting too long.
Never mind the quarter billion Obama has already spent on ebola.
As FOX plays politics with our troops going to Liberia.
And you wonder why I watch FOX right now with the "Special Report",
and then report their treachory Fair, Balanced and Unafraid .
Because troops shouldn't be sent anywhere they face possible death? :roll:I guess dropping off medication is not enough, we now have to send our troops to face possible death.
I doubt they are just sending soldiers to stand around with their guns... they are sending soldiers that are trained or prepared for such a crisis.
I don't know why the poll question didn't show, ugh.
It's my understanding that half of the people who get EBola die. People who have used every precaution still ended up getting it. I just don't understand why it's always us that gets involved. Why don't other countries ever offer to help? I just don't have a good feeling about this. Do I feel for these people? Yes I do. Do I feel like we already have our hands in multiple pots? Yes!
Morality? In what way? Most actions taken by a member of the military in a combat situation could be defined as immoral by someone.
I guess dropping off medication is not enough, we now have to send our troops to face possible death.
If you were ordered to go by the president, would you follow orders, or would you say no and face a dishonorable discharge?
To be fair, the survival rate for American victims so far has basically been 100%. The disease can be treated effectively with the right technology.
It also isn't all that easy to catch. It's a blood borne pathogen, meaning that you have to come into contact with either infected bodily fluids, or contaminated food or water, to catch it. Most of our servicemen wouldn't be in contact with either, and those that were would be following much more thorough sanitation procedures than the locals.
If the president is sending over the military I assume the funds would come out of DOD. But with the political atmosphere in D.C. at the moment all assumptions are off. I haven't had the TV on all day, been busy with other things so I don't know what FOX or any other station is saying about it. I have no problem with it and if I was still in, I would not hesitate to go or think anything about it.
They are sending medical, construction and just a few security personnel.
The mission, from what I've heard, is to build hospitals and clinics, train locals in medical procedures, and of course provide some basic security for our people (not an aggressive force).
I guess dropping off medication is not enough, we now have to send our troops to face possible death.
If you were ordered to go by the president, would you follow orders, or would you say no and face a dishonorable discharge?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?