• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If you watched both sides let’s have a discussion

Trump's reasonable, $5 Billion ask for for multiple items on his border-security agenda, not just funding a barrier!
People act like the ONLY thing Trump wants funding for is a wall, and it's been said over and over again that more wall is part of a comprehensive program with goes beyond physical barriers to include technology.
To the physical barriers, to a person, every single professional who's worked the border says that walls have helped and the statistics are there to prove it.
 
Democrats, along with the majority of Americans, are not interested in Trump’s wall. Only Trump and his minority base are pushing for it on the grounds of it being a “national emergency”. It is not and the facts prove it. Schumer’s argument for opening the government was right. Hundreds of thousands of Americans are now suffering for no valid reason. If Trump actually gave a s**t about Americans he’d open the government and negotiate for appropriate border protection measures. And don’t say the Dem run Congress isn’t willing to provide funds for border security because facts don’t support that argument either.


Make an appointment with your local audiologist. You apparently have a hearing problem. The Dems have been willing and ready from day 1 to support smart border security measures. Just not Trump’s dumbazz wall.

Hmm... can you cite the demorat supported (House or Senate) bill by number which contains those additional "smart border security measures"? Somehow, your first paragraph claimed that these "appropriate" measures needed to be "negotiated" and yet the second paragraph claims that they already exist. The FY2019 'budget' bills were due before 10/1/18 which makes the Schumer "we need more time to negotiate" position complete BS.
 
I wonder if the Gang of Eight's legislation was based on carefully-selected locations after the problem was studied and if so, can you cite said studies?
If not, my point remains that this is nothing more than denying Trump his campaign promise and moving the goal posts which didn't even seem to exist just a few short years ago when Dems were driving this funding.

I do not know what their criteria was. I do know what the criteria should be and it is
1- careful study to determine the problems
2- examination of solutions which would solve those problems
 
Last edited:
There's one thing that upsets your valid points, and that is the Democrats' hard-Left shift which has seen remarkable growth is socialistic policies, open-borders and abolish-ICE advocates and powerful people who invite criminal illegal aliens to their towns and states for sanctuary.
We have to protect ourselves from our own.

The existence of a few far left loons, like the existence of a few far right loons, makes little difference since no significant immigration law enforcement policy changes are being proposed or accepted by the majority. The demorat leadership is making (offering?) the completely false argument that the debate is between adding "smart" border security measures and Trumps "dumb" physical barrier when, in fact, the debate is between adding some of the Great Wall Of Trump and doing nothing different at all.
 
Could we please just have open minded Americans that actually watched both the President’s address and the democrats address. If you only wanted one then you’re close minded, please go to another post.
I thought the president was very professional, he put the facts that he gets from professional border security agents out for us to see, and told Americans about how the democrats are on video saying we must stop the illegal immigrant flow at our southern border, and he addressed the murders, rapes, and assaults. Now I listened to democrats hoping they would lay out their plan for the more advanced technology to stop border crossing, but all I heard was about putting technology at border crossings to catch drugs, I didn’t hear anything about stopping illegal criminals, or the murdered Americans. I gave them an open mind but they had nothing that sounded feasible, they did say open the government and discuss wall later, but they’ve already voted for it before so why do they need to discuss.
I also watched Bernie, his statement had more ideas than democrats, but he had also voted for border security before also. He got off on free stuff and old folks and such.
I personally think our president has our safety in mind so I like his ideas.
Tell us what you got from the addresses. But only if you watched both sides!

I watched both.

Trump delivered what I expected, an appeal for the wall based on his "facts" for what he feels was important enough to partially shut down government over. The address itself was full of misinformation and distortions of the truth. Ironically, that means Trump was appealing to the emotion of the argument, the "moral crisis" on our southern border.

And Pelosi / Schumer delivered what I expected as a response, an appeal for government to be opened despite Trump's "facts" suggesting the need for a wall. Asking to separate opening government back up using Congressional bipartisan negotiated agreements apart from Trump's demand for wall money. At the same time Pelosi / Schumer took Trump's bait and appealed to the counter emotional argument of partisanship and Trump's "manufacturing a crisis" rhetoric.

Ultimately what we are seeing is the worst of politics.

Trump distorted the truth plenty of times using the government shutdown for a wall for which the impact on the issues he stated is arguable, and Pelosi / Schumer countered with a calling the bluff sort of response questioning Trump's integrity and the need to shutdown government over the wall.

While Trump looked fairly calm but from time to time uncomfortable talking with his hands, Pelosi / Schumer stood there appearing like someone had AK-47s pointed at them forcing the speech.

I walked away from both addresses expecting to be on the latter end of a drinking game, but ended up disappointed that this is where we are with politics today. It is ugly, full of convenient political lies and distortions, and reminds us why we hand power back and forth on a violent back and forth pendulum to continued voter disappointment.

Neither address won me over, even though before either started I was convinced shutting government down over the wall would only end in degrees of loss. If Democrats cave, Trump will learn he can hijack a functional government for any wish he has. If Trump decides to cave, his base will flip out escalating all the misinformation Trump offered on the reasons for the wall in the first place.

The worst thing in the world here that so few are talking about is being against Trump's wall is not necessarily the same as being against border security. Because Democrats and Republicans seemingly cannot agree on what border security means the rhetoric shows up, with plenty of posters here at DP taking the bait with "open border" rhetoric.

As a nation we accomplished nothing last night, and there is no reason for the history books to be kind to anyone in politics today over this issue and so many others.

That is what I walked away with, continued disappointment in our elected leaders with no hope of immigration reform or border security coming our way anytime soon. Wall or not.
 
Hmm... can you cite the demorat supported (House or Senate) bill by number which contains those additional "smart border security measures"? Somehow, your first paragraph claimed that these "appropriate" measures needed to be "negotiated" and yet the second paragraph claims that they already exist. The FY2019 'budget' bills were due before 10/1/18 which makes the Schumer "we need more time to negotiate" position complete BS.

Congress approved $1.3B for improvements to border security in the 2018 budget, that was supported by Dems. To date, Trump has not spent 1/3 of the monies allotted/available.
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BUDGET-2018-BUD/pdf/BUDGET-2018-BUD.pdf
https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/CBP FY18 Budget.pdf

The House and Senate passed a CR in December that Trump said he would sign, but reneged on once Hannity, Coulter, Limbaugh and other far right wing nuts began criticizing him. The Dems have been saying all along that they are willing to discuss and fund smart border control measures. Trump is the holdout.
Appropriations Watch: FY 2019 | Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget
 
Anyone see the Bernie Sanders retort? I missed it.
 
Could we please just have open minded Americans that actually watched both the President’s address and the democrats address. If you only wanted one then you’re close minded, please go to another post.
I thought the president was very professional, he put the facts that he gets from professional border security agents out for us to see, and told Americans about how the democrats are on video saying we must stop the illegal immigrant flow at our southern border, and he addressed the murders, rapes, and assaults. Now I listened to democrats hoping they would lay out their plan for the more advanced technology to stop border crossing, but all I heard was about putting technology at border crossings to catch drugs, I didn’t hear anything about stopping illegal criminals, or the murdered Americans. I gave them an open mind but they had nothing that sounded feasible, they did say open the government and discuss wall later, but they’ve already voted for it before so why do they need to discuss.
I also watched Bernie, his statement had more ideas than democrats, but he had also voted for border security before also. He got off on free stuff and old folks and such.
I personally think our president has our safety in mind so I like his ideas.
Tell us what you got from the addresses. But only if you watched both sides!



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Republicans are missing this One Singular point which is that Pelosi is not going to negotiate with a hostage taker so open the government first, and then we'll talk
 
Y’all are right I guess, maybe I’m blinded by Trump, but could someone please tell me what Schumer said that explained what we need to do to stop illegals from killing and assaults. Sorry I heard nothing about that, did I miss it?
Did they explain why they changed from saying we gotta have border protection a few years ago to not wanting it now, did he say what changed?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The only thing that has changed is the fact that Trump wants to actually get it done. The party of resistance will never work with the other side even if it something they wanted just a few years ago. That is the side effects of being so full of hate. Sad.
 
Republicans are missing this One Singular point which is that Pelosi is not going to negotiate with a hostage taker so open the government first, and then we'll talk

It is clear how stubborn and full of hate she is. Policies that were voted for just a few years ago by their party are now the wrong thing to do because Trump is trying to actually get it done. As Trump pointed out it is the hard working people of this country that are being forced into poverty thanks to the hate by the democrats.
 
The only thing that has changed is the fact that Trump wants to actually get it done. The party of resistance will never work with the other side even if it something they wanted just a few years ago. That is the side effects of being so full of hate. Sad.

Get what done....his Wall? Not happening. The dems want to open all depts and agencies other than DHS and then cut a CR for DHS. Thats the deal. He can then put a full appropriation proposal before the Congress for them to deliberate and determine what they will fund. Outside of that, Donald can go soak his head!
 
Congress approved $1.3B for improvements to border security in the 2018 budget, that was supported by Dems. To date, Trump has not spent 1/3 of the monies allotted/available.
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BUDGET-2018-BUD/pdf/BUDGET-2018-BUD.pdf
https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/CBP FY18 Budget.pdf

The House and Senate passed a CR in December that Trump said he would sign, but reneged on once Hannity, Coulter, Limbaugh and other far right wing nuts began criticizing him. The Dems have been saying all along that they are willing to discuss and fund smart border control measures. Trump is the holdout.
Appropriations Watch: FY 2019 | Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget

From your first link, this is what Trump asked for:

Increase Border Security Infrastructure and Technology. The President’s Budget secures the borders of the united States by investing $2.6 billion in high-priority tactical infrastructure and border security technology, including funding to plan, design, and construct a physical wall along the southern border as directed by the President’s January 25, 2017 EO. This investment would strengthen border security, helping stem the flow of people, drugs, and other illicit materi- al illegally crossing the border.

Increase DHS Personnel. The Budget also advances the President’s plan to strengthen border security and immigration enforcement with more than $300 million to recruit, hire, and train 500 new Border Patrol Agents and 1,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement law enforcement personnel in 2018, plus associated support staff. These new personnel would improve the integrity of the immigration system by adding capacity to interdict those aliens attempting to cross the border illegally, as well as to identify and remove those already in the united States who entered illegally.

Enforce the Nation’s Laws. The Budget enhances enforcement of immigration laws by proposing an additional $1.5 billion above the 2017 annualized CR level for expanded detention, transportation, and removal of il- legal immigrants. These funds would ensure that DHS has sufficient detention capacity to hold prioritized aliens, including violent criminals and other dangerous individuals, as they are processed for removal.

When was that spending approved? Never - yet you assert Trump has simply not yet done that.
 
And this reality is key to the issue.

Trump used the wall as a huge applause getter during the campaign. We know that he was advised to use it as shorthand for immigration concerns with the right wing. So now he want to go back to his base and say he delivered on the promise.

The problem he has is simple one: his solution does not solve the problems that he maintains require his solution. And I know of no study which says they would. So Trump is screwed on this issue and its his own fault.

The dems would be foolish to let him off the hook. In fact, I think the Dems should double down and demand full hearings before both houses of Congress on the issue of illegal drugs coming into the country and border security problems and bring in a whole raft of experts and put Trumps wall solution to the test. Lets do that.

That's what's so incredibly incompetent about Trump's approach. He's trying (or we can assume this) to win over people, and him insulting us with using drugs as a reason, or anecdotes about horrible crimes by 'illegals', isn't going to convince anyone. What might convince me are credible people presenting a case for 'the wall' starting with what the wall is, where it will go, why it's needed. Let them explain how the wall proposed can overcome the property rights issues that dogged Bush's efforts, and the water issues, and environmental issues. I can't find that anywhere. All I can find is Trump demanding his money to do....something!!!.... build a big f'ing WALL!!!... 1,000 MILES!!!! or else. My response to that is f you.
 
Democrats are not going to fund any kind of wall. End of story.

Have you seen Trump produce any evidence that a wall is a cost effect strategy to limit illegal immigration and drug smuggling?

If you haven't seen such evidence, why do you think spending $5b on a small portion of such a wall is a good idea?
 
Could we please just have open minded Americans that actually watched both the President’s address and the democrats address. If you only wanted one then you’re close minded, please go to another post.
I thought the president was very professional, he put the facts that he gets from professional border security agents out for us to see, and told Americans about how the democrats are on video saying we must stop the illegal immigrant flow at our southern border, and he addressed the murders, rapes, and assaults. Now I listened to democrats hoping they would lay out their plan for the more advanced technology to stop border crossing, but all I heard was about putting technology at border crossings to catch drugs, I didn’t hear anything about stopping illegal criminals, or the murdered Americans. I gave them an open mind but they had nothing that sounded feasible, they did say open the government and discuss wall later, but they’ve already voted for it before so why do they need to discuss.
I also watched Bernie, his statement had more ideas than democrats, but he had also voted for border security before also. He got off on free stuff and old folks and such.
I personally think our president has our safety in mind so I like his ideas.
Tell us what you got from the addresses. But only if you watched both sides!



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I didn't hear anything from Trump about why Mexico isn't paying for his wall. That was his promise, and considering the crisis it has led to, surely he should explain why he's not keeping it.
 
It is clear how stubborn and full of hate she is. Policies that were voted for just a few years ago by their party are now the wrong thing to do because Trump is trying to actually get it done. As Trump pointed out it is the hard working people of this country that are being forced into poverty thanks to the hate by the democrats.

You're missing the point she's she's not going to negotiate with hostage-takers open the government first and then we'll talk
 
Trump’s a broken record.

Pelosi and Schumer were predictable, but did their job.

Score it an unforced error for trump.

Take away? Stick a fork in trump, he’s done.
 
Which included $0 for the physical barrier funding requested.
Where did I say Trump got $ for the wall? That has been the argument all along. Trump wants a wall and Dems/American majority don’t. That doesn’t, contrary to Trump club members beliefs, mean Dems have not cared about or supported making our border more secure. Duh.
 
There's one thing that upsets your valid points, and that is the Democrats' hard-Left shift which has seen remarkable growth is socialistic policies, open-borders and abolish-ICE advocates and powerful people who invite criminal illegal aliens to their towns and states for sanctuary.

We have to protect ourselves from our own.

And you're ignoring the employers who hire illegals because they're cheap, dependable, hard working labor and who killed mandatory e-Verify in the House this summer because so many GOP donors and influential constituents objected to the provision. It didn't make it out of committee. So the towns are inviting criminal illegal aliens hired by that town's big, influential employers, farmers like Devin Nunes' family who run a dairy operation.

The 'illegal' non-problem from where the employers sit is the same problem as drugs. When there is a big demand for something, that demand will be filled, and the 'wall' won't cut off the supply.

For labor, the 'solution' often proposed is to expand work permits, but we already know that currently the clear majority if not the vast majority of 'illegals' are coming here legally and just not leaving. Part of that could be attributed to making crossings harder, so once someone gets here, they cannot go back home for risk of being caught coming back for next season's jobs. So they stay.

The point of all this is the 'illegal' problem isn't as simple as putting up walls. If we want to address it in a serious way, it's going to take making hard decisions about farm labor, for example. The dairy farmers around here don't hire illegals because they don't like the local workers, but because illegals work 7 day weeks and are reliable and allow them to survive a difficult business with tiny margins.
 
And you're ignoring the employers who hire illegals because they're cheap, dependable, hard working labor and who killed mandatory e-Verify in the House this summer because so many GOP donors and influential constituents objected to the provision. It didn't make it out of committee. So the towns are inviting criminal illegal aliens hired by that town's big, influential employers, farmers like Devin Nunes' family who run a dairy operation.

The 'illegal' non-problem from where the employers sit is the same problem as drugs. When there is a big demand for something, that demand will be filled, and the 'wall' won't cut off the supply.

For labor, the 'solution' often proposed is to expand work permits, but we already know that currently the clear majority if not the vast majority of 'illegals' are coming here legally and just not leaving. Part of that could be attributed to making crossings harder, so once someone gets here, they cannot go back home for risk of being caught coming back for next season's jobs. So they stay.

The point of all this is the 'illegal' problem isn't as simple as putting up walls. If we want to address it in a serious way, it's going to take making hard decisions about farm labor, for example. The dairy farmers around here don't hire illegals because they don't like the local workers, but because illegals work 7 day weeks and are reliable and allow them to survive a difficult business with tiny margins.

The wall won't cut off the supply of drugs considering the DEA said most drugs come into this country via legal ports of entry.

https://www.factcheck.org/2017/08/will-trumps-wall-stop-drug-smuggling/
 
Where did I say Trump got $ for the wall? That has been the argument all along. Trump wants a wall and Dems/American majority don’t. That doesn’t, contrary to Trump club members beliefs, mean Dems have not cared about or supported making our border more secure. Duh.

Finally, we see that "compromise" to you means simply saying no to Trump.
 
Back
Top Bottom