• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If you have young sons start training them to be fathers way earlier. You're not gonna stop sex and many will be fathers from 15-18yo.

Chomsky said:
I'm at a loss to understand the meaning of this, in terms of child support for grandkids?
Click to expand...

IMO, many parents will be more than happy to provide the $$ for the teen mother/couple to travel to another state for an abortion so that "they dont have to pay for one mistake for their entire lives."

If the kids are teens, there's plenty of time left for grandkids.
 
this thread needs to bumped today.
 
They will be Dads and even if they are not present in the child's life they will have salary attachments for child support....forever. Good going Rep[ublicans you just increased the number of single parent families and at risk kids.
 
Callen said:
They will be Dads and even if they are not present in the child's life they will have salary attachments for child support....forever. Good going Rep[ublicans you just increased the number of single parent families and at risk kids.
Click to expand...
yup
 
IMO, many parents will be more than happy to provide the $$ for the teen mother/couple to travel to another state for an abortion so that "they dont have to pay for one mistake for their entire lives."

If the kids are teens, there's plenty of time left for grandkids.
 
Callen said:
They will be Dads and even if they are not present in the child's life they will have salary attachments for child support....forever. Good going Rep[ublicans you just increased the number of single parent families and at risk kids.
Click to expand...
Or 18 years, whichever comes first.
Single parent families have long been a problem we have stuck our heads in the sand about.

If this brings about a positive change in that regard, then I say good job.
Hopefully, we can change the archaic laws regarding custodial support and custody in general as well.

The at risk kids will likely not grow, abortions did not get outlawed (regardless of the hyperbole that abounds right now).
 
CaughtInThe said:
And while you're at it go ahead and get a second job so that you can be a grandparent in your thirties and pay child support.
Click to expand...

justabubba said:
And pay more taxes to cover the cost of the unwanted children who are compelled to be birthed
Likewise, more taxes for more social workers to look after the children who are not wanted by their birth parents but who show up anyway thanks to the GQP
Click to expand...

These posts aged like wine.
 
CaughtInThe said:
oh, it's coming.

the question is how pissed off will the parents of 15-17yo Texas boys be.
Click to expand...
Little Johnny Sixpak (aged 15) gets little Suzie (aged 14) pregnant.

Little Suzie's parents refuse to consent to her getting married at age 14.

EXAMINATION QUESTIONS?

[1] How much child support will little Johnny Sixpak be ordered to pay? (Assume that little Johnny has an "income" of $50.00 per month as an "allowance" from his parents and no other source of income.)​
​
[2] Will the amount of child support that little Johnny Sixpak is ordered to pay to little Suzie be reduced when little Johnny gets little MaryAnn (aged 12) pregnant?​
​
[3] Is a a court order that a minor pay $X for something and which does not include a provision for incarceration should the minor not pay enforceable against the minor when the minor reaches the age of majority.​
​
[4] If the court orders little Johnny Sixpak to pay 25% of his allowance of $50.00 per month to little Suzie as child support, and if the court order includes a provision for incarceration should little Johnny not pay, how long can little Johnny be incarcerated if he does not pay? (Assume that the first payment is due when little Johnny is six months short of his 16th birthday when he misses the first payment)?​
​
[5] Exactly what percentage of the cost of raising a child would $50.00/month constitute?​
 
TU Curmudgeon said:
Little Johnny Sixpak (aged 15) gets little Suzie (aged 14) pregnant.

Little Suzie's parents refuse to consent to her getting married at age 14.

EXAMINATION QUESTIONS?

[1] How much child support will little Johnny Sixpak be ordered to pay? (Assume that little Johnny has an "income" of $50.00 per month as an "allowance" from his parents and no other source of income.)​
​
[2] Will the amount of child support that little Johnny Sixpak is ordered to pay to little Suzie be reduced when little Johnny gets little MaryAnn (aged 12) pregnant?​
​
[3] Is a a court order that a minor pay $X for something and which does not include a provision for incarceration should the minor not pay enforceable against the minor when the minor reaches the age of majority.​
​
[4] If the court orders little Johnny Sixpak to pay 25% of his allowance of $50.00 per month to little Suzie as child support, and if the court order includes a provision for incarceration should little Johnny not pay, how long can little Johnny be incarcerated if he does not pay? (Assume that the first payment is due when little Johnny is six months short of his 16th birthday when he misses the first payment)?​
​
[5] Exactly what percentage of the cost of raising a child would $50.00/month constitute?​
Click to expand...
Given the lack of respect for women in the 26 states that are about to ban or drastically restrict I have little doubt that those states will enact laws that still allow males especially young males, their sexual freedom with few consequences. The enacted law will probably force the pregnant girl into a situation where she has to prove rape before any child support is required from males.
 
weaver2 said:
Given the lack of respect for women in the 26 states that are about to ban or drastically restrict I have little doubt that those states will enact laws that still allow males especially young males, their sexual freedom with few consequences. The enacted law will probably force the pregnant girl into a situation where she has to prove rape before any child support is required from males.
Click to expand...
Even then paternity has to be determined using samples obtained from the purported father. The Fifth Amendment makes it unconstitutional to take those samples without the consent of the purported father.

How would that work?

Well, in the civil (paternity) trial, the purported father produces 10 witnesses all of whom swear under oath that they had unprotected sex with the mother. All 11 of them invoke their constitutional right not to give evidence against themselves. The jury now has 11 potential fathers. That means that there is a 9% chance that any one of them is the father. 9% does not meet the "balance of probability" standard. The mother of the child receives no child support and "The Bimbo Boffing Club" carries on as before.

PS - There is an aversion to "post facto" positions and the woman would have to have actually have made a claim to have been raped BEFORE knowing that they were pregnant. When there is no span between "fertilization" and "commencement of period in which abortion is banned", this would be somewhat difficult to do.
 
Hey, maybe young testosterone filled boys / men like in Texas and in the army and in sports and in school are simply going to stop having sex.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom