David_N
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2015
- Messages
- 6,562
- Reaction score
- 2,769
- Location
- The United States
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Neither of us wanted to leave our babies in child care when we did, at mere weeks old. But neither of us had the luxury of choice. Our employers would not grant us any more time for parental leave. Our children were on our health care plans through work, and like the majority of American families, we couldn’t make ends meet on one income.
So, reluctantly, on an April morning in Oklahoma, Shepard was left at day care. A child care worker swaddled him for a nap, placed him in a car seat and didn’t check on him. He slipped down and suffocated, still too little to lift up his own head.
Just as reluctantly, in July, Karl was dropped off for his first day at day care near his mother’s office in Manhattan. When she came back to feed him at noon, Karl’s lips were blue and a child care worker was performing CPR. It could not be determined why this healthy baby died.
We believe that infants need to be with their parents at the beginning of their lives. And we are jointly calling on our parties, Republican and Democrat, to put aside their differences and pass job-protected, paid parental leave, for the sake of all American babies.
We are not alone in enduring such anguish. Just last week it was reported that a 3-month-old girl in Pennsylvania died on her first day of day care – the first time the mother was away from her daughter for more than 90 minutes.
Yet, here we are: One in four American mothers have no choice but to return to work within two weeks of giving birth; 87% of parents have no access to paid leave through their employers, according to a report from The Center for Law and Social Policy, an anti-poverty organization.
A study by McGill University and UCLA Fielding School of Public Health found that for each additional month a woman has maternity leave, infant mortality goes down 13%.
America has the highest infant mortality rate of any industrialized nation, according to the CDC. And research has shown that 60% of SIDS deaths occur in child care settings, non-profit First Candle says.
Of course, parental leave is not usually an issue of life and death. It is, however, an issue of our children’s health and well-being. When Norway began offering mothers paid leave, there were dramatic long-range effects: Children had lower high school dropout rates, higher rates of college attendance and higher incomes at age 30.
American babies whose mothers don’t have maternity leave are less likely to be taken to the doctor and less likely to be breastfed. Toddlers of parents without paid leave have more behavioral problems and score lower on cognitive tests, says a report from the National Bureau of Economic Research.
Benefits are up to employers to decide. Frankly its a violation of the right to property and contract to force the issue.
Not true. Employers are forced to provide quite a few basic things.
Not true. Employers are forced to provide quite a few basic things.
True. Which is why they should not have to provide more.
Every added tax or employee benefit requirement adds to pressures putting small businesses out of business, and large businesses to pass the costs onto the rest of us.
If women want to work, then don't have kids until they are ready to stay home and take care of them while their husbands (or significant others) work to pay the bills. :coffeepap:
Why not? Hell, employers who have below a certain number of employees get tax breaks or the government subsidizes the paid leave. Problem solved. The real question is, where is the problem in other countries? There isn't one, and the benefits are numerous. I'm sorry, but the "don't have kids" argument ignores reality. Women are going to have kids regardless.
Why not? Hell, employers who have below a certain number of employees get tax breaks or the government subsidizes the paid leave. Problem solved. The real question is, where is the problem in other countries? There isn't one, and the benefits are numerous. I'm sorry, but the "don't have kids" argument ignores reality. Women are going to have kids regardless.
So now you're advocating taxpayers have to pay for peoples paid leave? sigh..
What makes you think a tax increase has to accompany such a venture?
Did you miss the part about passing the costs onto the rest of us consumers?
Where do people get the idea that business is a charity? The point of doing business is to make a profit.
It's one thing to offer vacation time, sick leave, and the occasional bonus to keep workers happy and productive. The government already requires 12 weeks of unpaid FMLA for medical issues if you've worked for the employer long enough.
It's another thing to give paid parental leave for months of non-work time.
Ok, some businesses raise prices by a tiny amount, this is obviously a soul crushing burden in every other country with paid leave, especially in poorer countries. Oh wait....Did you miss the part about passing the costs onto the rest of us consumers?
Where did I disagree?The point of doing business is to make a profit.
I agree, it's something we need.It's another thing to give paid parental leave for months of non-work time.
Who mentioned a tax increase?
Oh right, you're suggesting that the government spend money they doesn't have.
Ok, some businesses raise prices by a tiny amount, this is obviously a soul crushing burden in every other country with paid leave, especially in poorer countries. Oh wait....
Where did I disagree?
I agree, it's something we need.
Henrin, where do you think the private sector gets money from?
Don't tell me you're whole point is now going to be that money is debt. That argument gets old real quick.
What do you think money is Henrin? In the real world, not fantasy land.
So , knowing that they couldn't afford for one parent to stay home and be with the kids and knowing they would have to put the kids in daycare they chose to have kids. an accident ( possibly neglect I don tknow the specifics ) happened... and now they are blaming it all on their employer. hrm..
Why not? Hell, employers who have below a certain number of employees get tax breaks or the government subsidizes the paid leave. Problem solved. The real question is, where is the problem in other countries? There isn't one, and the benefits are numerous. I'm sorry, but the "don't have kids" argument ignores reality. Women are going to have kids regardless.
.... huh? When you stay home without paid leave, you're not bringing in any income. No one is saying people can't afford daycare if they work, the question is, what is better for the baby?Frankly, I don't buy it. Day care costs plenty. If you can afford that, you can most likely afford to just stay home for a couple of months.
Well I'll let the neanderthal extremist far right fight against an idea that has little to no impact on business at all and works in the rest of the civilized world. :roll:
Congratulations America, due to knuckle dragging Far Right Conservative ideologues you're like, LIBERIA! FREEDOM PARTAY!
Give this a read, I truly can't understand why we don't have paid parental leave. It's embarrassing. The richest nation on earth and we can't even help new mothers be with their kids.
Voices: If we had parental leave, our sons might still be alive today
The benefits outweigh any potential negatives:
So , knowing that they couldn't afford for one parent to stay home and be with the kids and knowing they would have to put the kids in daycare they chose to have kids. an accident ( possibly neglect I don tknow the specifics ) happened... and now they are blaming it all on their employer. hrm..
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?