• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

If United Europe Went to War With The U.S.A

Napoleon's Nightingale said:
The tests that took place in space did have the effects I described and I've provided the sources that back up my claims.

No. They didnt.
The effects were nowhere near as dramatic or as widespread as you claimed.
Nowhere close.
 
Napoleon's Nightingale said:
I find it interesting that you're incapable of independant thought and analysis.
Translation:
I dont care what anyone else says!
I'm right! I'm right! I'm right! I'm right! I'm right! I'm right! I'm right!

Look up what makes an entitlement an entitlement.
Yes. Lets:

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=entitlement
A government program that guarantees and provides benefits to a particular group: “fights... to preserve victories won a generation ago, like the Medicaid entitlement for the poor” (Jason DeParle).

http://www.auburn.edu/~johnspm/gloss/entitlement_program
The kind of government program that provides individuals with personal financial benefits (or sometimes special government-provided goods or services) to which an indefinite (but usually rather large) number of potential beneficiaries have a legal right (enforceable in court, if necessary) whenever they meet eligibility conditions that are specified by the standing law that authorizes the program. The beneficiaries of entitlement programs are normally individual citizens or residents, but sometimes organizations such as business corporations, local governments, or even political parties may have similar special "entitlements" under certain programs. The most important examples of entitlement programs at the federal level in the United States would include Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, most Veterans' Administration programs, federal employee and military retirement plans, unemployment compensation, food stamps, and agricultural price support programs.

http://texaspolitics.laits.utexas.edu/glossary/index.php?term=entitlement program
A government program that pays benefits to individuals, organizations, or other governments that meet eligibility requirements set by law. Among the largest and most common examples are income security programs such as social security, the largest federal entitlement program for individuals. Since entitlement programs mandate spending levels, they have a dramatic impact on annual federal and state budgets, large percentages of which are devoted to such programs each year.


Now, why dont YOU cite an authoritative source that says SocSec -isn;t- an entitlement program.

Good luck, troll-boy.
 
M14 Shooter said:
No. They didnt.
The effects were nowhere near as dramatic or as widespread as you claimed.
Nowhere close.

Acctually they were. My assertions are supported by the Department of Defense, NASA, and various nuclear physicists and I have proved that with the links I provided.
 
Re:

If United Europe Went to War With The U.S.A

If they did this would be the biggest mistake europe would make in their whole entire history.

America would easily crush Europe. It would be a :shrug: to us
 
Re:

SKILMATIC said:
If they did this would be the biggest mistake europe would make in their whole entire history.

America would easily crush Europe. It would be a :shrug: to us

only if we used nukes. If not... itd be millions of casualties on both sides. We'd win, but I don't think victory would be a mere shrug.
 
Napoleon's Nightingale said:
Acctually they were. My assertions are supported by the Department of Defense, NASA, and various nuclear physicists and I have proved that with the links I provided.

Wow.
Such a bald-faced lie.

Thats just sad.
 
The Europeans almost lost to Serbia in the 90's.We had to save them from Serbia,Serbia,. They dont want to give up their socialist fairylands they've created.They will never support a military capable of doing very much.
 
M14 Shooter my good friend,the British and our Deutshlandfriend plus the Australia,Canada,and NEW ZEALAND our forces would roll across your

PRAIRRIES

with our tanks know bother at all,then our submarines and navys,what a
nightmare u guys would have when we take u out,because your forces,all of them R shite,so dont be so sure of yourselves.I dont think u know what u R
getting into.Then the Russians plus the Chinks would have a go as well,they would back us before U Americans know probs about that,olso the middle
east have a bone to pick with U as well.tThen the French well what do u say about them,i am sure they dont love America.Neclear u can for get about that aswell as we have them 2.Go on back 2 your bed and dream.
Dont count your chickens.
Just as well U have us to keep u guys right.

my kind regards to U

mikeey
 
MY AMERICAN friends sorry about the word shite,your soldiers are good lads
plus good soldiers as good as any 1 verry verry sorry to say these things

some times i say things frome my heart but not from my head

so sorry

mikeey
 
M14 Shooter said:
Wow.
Such a bald-faced lie.

Thats just sad.

What I said is true and backed by the links I provided. Read the posts. Obviously you can't handle the truth.
 
Re:

nkgupta80 said:
only if we used nukes. If not... itd be millions of casualties on both sides. We'd win, but I don't think victory would be a mere shrug.

Well thats what I am saying. If we used nukes it would be an easy task. If we didnt it still would be an easy task. It would be more difficult than the first task but it still would be easy. If you dont know then I could explain to you how because I am a war science fanatic.
 
iamjack said:
US vs Russia is like US vs Japan, yesterday's news.

that shows you have no clue
RUSSIA still has nukes
and stealth aricraft
and much more new capable inventories
YOU think russia is weak but it is not it even has oil plenty of oil
there was never a us vs japan war in all of history
you are clueless
 
gordon said:
that shows you have no clue
RUSSIA still has nukes
and stealth aricraft
and much more new capable inventories
YOU think russia is weak but it is not it even has oil plenty of oil
there was never a us vs japan war in all of history
you are clueless


This shows you are an idiot. Russia possesses no such thing as stealth aircraft. We are the only country that has stealth technology.

You mean to tell me the US never was at war with Japan?

Have you ever read a history book?

The US was in an al out war with Japan in WW2. Do you ever recall the a-bomb droppings on Ngasaki and Hiroshima? You do know those cities are in Japan right?

Also if the US went in an all out nuclear war with Russia the US would obliterate Russia in about a month. And the US would sustain very few casualties. In ten yrs the US will have over 330 YF-22's. Which if you know anything about war the YF-22(aka Raptor) is the only fighter jet that harnesses stealth technology and can in unisen destroy 10different ground targets and 5 different air targets. The only draw back is the Raptor can only carry a very limited amount of artillery. However, having over 330 of them wont be a problem especially if they are invisible.

So please, Russia is nothing but another step to me. Please learn facts.
 
gordon said:
that shows you have no clue
RUSSIA still has nukes
and stealth aricraft
and much more new capable inventories
YOU think russia is weak but it is not it even has oil plenty of oil
there was never a us vs japan war in all of history
you are clueless

Dude, I was saying there aint no animosity anymore. You think I'm clueless and you're saying I'm making a comparison of fiscal strength? Japan's miles ahead of Russia economically. You on the other hand are a loser for ever and ever and always, now go away.
 
iamjack said:
Dude, I was saying there aint no animosity anymore. You think I'm clueless and you're saying I'm making a comparison of fiscal strength? Japan's miles ahead of Russia economically. You on the other hand are a loser for ever and ever and always, now go away.

Dont worry he got banned. He was a individual known as canuck and he tried re logging on to the forum as a different alias.
 
Back
Top Bottom