• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If Trump is nominated again would you be forced to vote for a woman that ran against him?

If Trump is nominated again would you be forced to vote for a woman that ran against him?


  • Total voters
    23
You know, I never understood what it is with the far-left and their intense sexism against women.
Do you consider referring to VP Harris as "Kamalho" or "Kamaltoe" to be "intense sexism" against a woman?
 
No, it is just being vulgar. Probably goes over well in a high school boys locker room.
How well do you think it goes over in a debate forum when a 63 year old male repeatedly posts it, in which almost all, if not all, members are 'adults'----many of which are women?
 
Unfortunately for you, it's already well know that he wasn't mocking a reporter's disability. He was just mocking a disabled reporter.
There's a big difference between the two.
Are you attempting to trumpsplain or are you being serious?
 
Are you attempting to trumpsplain or are you being serious?
There's nothing wrong with mocking someone. Trump's an ass and that's about that, but this whole shtick of trying to claim that he mocked the reporter because of his disability. Was a tactic that died shortly before the story did. This is an old story that never got real traction, because it was all too obvious what exactly they were trying to do by twisting the narrative around.

No one really cared that he was mocking someone and when people like CNN tried to lie about it, they took offense. Simply because it was an insult to their intelligence.
 
There's nothing wrong with mocking someone. Trump's an ass and that's about that, but this whole shtick of trying to claim that he mocked the reporter because of his disability. Was a tactic that died shortly before the story did. This is an old story that never got real traction, because it was all too obvious what exactly they were trying to do by twisting the narrative around.

No one really cared that he was mocking someone and when people like CNN tried to lie about it, they took offense. Simply because it was an insult to their intelligence.
Trumpers didn't care. Everyone else was appalled. They still are.
 
How well do you think it goes over in a debate forum when a 63 year old male repeatedly posts it, in which almost all, if not all, members are 'adults'----many of which are women?
I don't know any 63 year old males.
Glad you qualified the number of adults in the forum.
 
The leftist radicals on this board would vote for anyone other than Trump....they suffer from TDS and simply cannot help themselves. If Trump wins again, it will be worse than in 2016....insane people crying, breaking down, and going nuts all over the place, lol.
 
Back
Top Bottom