Navy Pride
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2005
- Messages
- 39,883
- Reaction score
- 3,070
- Location
- Pacific NW
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Who defined marriage in the first place and who gave them the right to do so?
1.)Because there has always been an implicit idea of intimacy in marriage.
2.)In fact it is considered fraud to marry simply for the purpose of gaining entry into the country, this is because it is not just a contract between individuals it is a contract between implied intimate individuals.
3.) When we remove any implicit idea of what traditional marriage is we render it meaningless.
4.) This is a necessary result of a change in the definition.
I don't think the one who did it needs yours or anyone else permission.
I don't think the one who did it needs yours or anyone else permission.
1.) you factually are not
2.) you are factually wrong
3.) say 25 more times the facts wont change you are factually not for equal rights and they factually dont have them
4.) odd can your quote the post where i called you a homophone and or bigot in this thread? I never did
5.) its not my hookup lol another fail
6.) nobody is redefining marriage this lie always fails, gay marriage is factually marriage.
also ill be waiting for you to quote me calling YOU a bigot and or homophobe in this thread. it never happened.
Moderator's Warning: |
translation: you dont know
1.)No matter how much you want it you saying it does not make it so,
2.)Your left wing buddies have.
If you don't know that is so sad.
Marriage is not named as a religious sacrament. Its called Holy Matrimony.
These are states that flat said no to SSM.
I am for equal rights to and I believe you already have them....I have said this over and over again but as usual you are not listening and just throwing out you stale homophobe and bigot names when I am neither. Call your hook up whatever you want but don't try and redefine marriage.
It's going to happen even in your backwater state within 5 years, so are you saying you don't wish to live that long?
No, it's not called that. It's called maritare, because it's Latin. In English, it's either marriage or matrimony. Now, why do you want the US government involved in religious matters? Do you support the Constitution?
No I'm a Bible believer,,,,roots and culture you could say that I do not approve based on belief. I am not judging,,just discerning. Everybody is responsible for their own behavior, both spiritually and secular. Due to my Moral belief system,,,,,I do not like subsidizing a non prolific Marriage basis based on Faith principles. Yes,,my opinion is as subjective,,so is yours.
Don't lecture me on Latin I went to Catholic School for 12 years and can speak latin fluently and the sacrament is Holy Matrimony.
I do support the Constitution and there is nothing in it about SSM and don't bring up the 14th amendment equal rights clause because the framers of that amendment had nothing about SSM and would turn over in their graves if they could see how the left has twisted that amendment.
Don't lecture me on Latin I went to Catholic School for 12 years and can speak latin fluently
and the sacrament is Holy Matrimony.
I do support the Constitution
and there is nothing in it about SSM
and don't bring up the 14th amendment equal rights clause because the framers of that amendment had nothing about SSM and would turn over in their graves if they could see how the left has twisted that amendment.
It's sad that this isn't what you said before. So very sad. Why did you change your argument?
Yes and I certainly DO NOT think there is any major proof to say that same sex unions can not raise a child,,,normal? No,,,but I do know Gays have integrity the same as any other individual on a responsibility level. I am not saying Gays are less,,,,,I am saying I cannot personally approve of the premise of two of the same kind being married.The fed "subsidizes" it if you're referring to taxes, and the fed is trillions in debt. No need to worry about that. In fact, SSM has proven an economic boon for the states that allow it, and adopting kids takes them off the foster care rolls.
You really need to go back and read what I said.
Next thing you know,,Cousins and siblings will want to marry,,what is the plan for that?
Yes and I certainly DO NOT think there is any major proof to say that same sex unions can not raise a child,,,normal? No,,,but I do know Gays have integrity the same as any other individual on a responsibility level. I am not saying Gays are less,,,,,I am saying I cannot personally approve of the premise of two of the same kind being married.
Next thing you know,,Cousins and siblings will want to marry,,what is the plan for that?
You talked about votes. Then you wanted to talk about amendments. Then you wanted to talk about amendments only in red states.
You keep changing your argument, it's really kinda funny. Gay people are getting married all over, calm down, stop crying. You don't even have to marry one (YET! OMG!).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?