• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If President Donald Trump can pull this off, they better start erecting the scaffolding in South Dakota.

Mycroft

Genius is where you find it.
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 27, 2011
Messages
114,801
Reaction score
54,062
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Today, we start to hear of some rather stunning developments in the region that might explain multiple background stories, including the above and the severity of response from President Trump when he felt that Israel was overreacting to the Iran missile fired during the early hours of the ceasefire.

In a stunning development, Israel Hayom is reporting on the outlines of a peace agreement and long-term solution for the Israel-Gaza conflict. The report might explain why President Trump made bold moves in Syria recently, including the removal of all U.S./western sanctions and the close relationship between Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman (MbS).

According to Israel Hayom, there was a 4-way call (Trump, Netanyahu, Rubio, Dermer) after the Iran strikes. President Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu agreed to “fundamental principles in general terms” including:

♦ “Gaza hostilities will conclude within two weeks.” ♦ “Four Arab nations (including Egypt and the UAE) will administer the Gaza Strip, replacing the murderous Hamas terrorist organization.” ♦ “The remaining Hamas leadership will face exile to other countries (possibly Qatar and Turkey), while the hostages gain freedom.” ♦ “Multiple nations globally will accept numerous Gaza inhabitants seeking emigration.” ♦ “Abraham Accords expansion will bring Syria, Saudi Arabia, and additional Arab and Muslim countries to recognize Israel and establish official relationships.” ♦ “Israel will declare its willingness for future Palestinian conflict resolution under the ‘two states’ concept, contingent upon the Palestinian Authority reforms.” ♦ “The United States will acknowledge limited Israeli sovereignty implementation in Judea and Samaria.”

Israeli Report - Trump, Netanyahu and Arab Partners Close to Peace Solution for Gaza - The Last Refuge

Last night on CNBC Presidential Envoy Steve Witkoff hinted that some stunning revelations around expansion of the Abraham Peace Accords would likely surface in the next week. Immediately thereafter, President Trump sent a message of support for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu...
theconservativetreehouse.com
​


This is what they call "Peace through Strength".
 
More lies is all we can expect for the next 3 years so this means nothing.
 
Airyaman said:
The Conservative Treehouse?
Click to expand...
Right. The news doesn't matter to you...even if reported by reputable news organizations...if it's presented by CTH.

You love to shoot the messenger so you don't have to consider reality.
 
Mycroft said:
Right. The news doesn't matter to you...even if reported by reputable news organizations...if it's presented by CTH.

You love to shoot the messenger so you don't have to consider reality.
Click to expand...
Sorry but when you choose a shit source, then expect everyone to ignore it.
 
I'll believe it when I see it. But giving Trump all the credit would be moronic even if it did happen. It was Bibi's idea. Trump just wanted to look strong and he was well aware that it was *his* fault that Iranian nukes were a consideration for Bibi to cite: he ripped up the Obama deal that was working.

None of this was necessary, and both leaders are about the worst there could be for the situation. That was the problem.

It further raises the question of where is Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis in all this?

It's all well and good for there to be agreements. But if Iran is fine with its proxies keep on the fight, there's still going to be conflict, because no matter how evil Bibi is and no matter what Americans say about Israel's actions, Israel cannot tell its citizens "yeah, we're just not going to fight, in the interest of peace. Bow your necks and wait for the sword. Hopefully the enemy won't swing it again".

Mycroft said:
Right. The news doesn't matter to you...even if reported by reputable news organizations...if it's presented by CTH.

You love to shoot the messenger so you don't have to consider reality.
Click to expand...

Mycroft reports Conservative Treehouse reports that Witkoff hinted. That's what you're running with now. And you have never not predicted the best from Trump, then came up with bullshit excuses when it failed to materialize.

::
 
Not sure what in Trump’s track record makes Mycroft think he is remotely capable of anything like this. Literally everything he ever touched in his 80-year life has ended as a complete cluster****. But sure, surprise me!
 
Michael Cole said:
“Multiple nations globally will accept numerous Gaza inhabitants seeking emigration.”

Israel and the US determined this?
Click to expand...
Bibi has talked about sending refugees to countries he's mad at - like Ireland.

I'm sure Ireland has an opinion on that.
 
Yes, authoritarians do say "peace through strength".
 
It would be more appropriate to place a likeness of Trump at Stone Mountain.
 
Mycroft said:
Right. The news doesn't matter to you...even if reported by reputable news organizations...if it's presented by CTH.

You love to shoot the messenger so you don't have to consider reality.
Click to expand...
We all ought to know by now that left-leaning CNN is their go-to for accurate news "information".
 
I’m just wondering—why do you always pull news from the deepest, darkest sewage pits of the conservative echo chamber to validate your stance?


I mean, that kind of sourcing makes you look more desperate than credible. It’s the same reaction people would have if someone on the left quoted headlines from ultra-commie-treehugger-socialistradical.org and called it “proof.”


So my question is this:
Are you actually trying to convince others… or are you just desperately trying to validate your own belief system?


Not trying to insult or troll you—just genuinely curious. It’s like you go out of your way to find the most biased and untrustworthy sources out there—ones that make Fox News or Newsmax look like MSNBC on crack.

Diving Mullah
 
This really would be amazing, and I heard just a tiny bit about it earlier on Fox News.

I'm going to wait to see if this ends up looking possible before I believe it or get excited about it but dang, if it ends up true, it really would be fantastic.
 
LOL
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…