Black_Zawisza
Banned
- Joined
- May 11, 2010
- Messages
- 606
- Reaction score
- 259
- Location
- United States
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
...and are simply privileges granted by society, was Hitler wrong in gassing innocent people? If so, why?
...and are simply privileges granted by society, was Hitler wrong in gassing innocent people? If so, why?
You're begging the question. Why is hurting society wrong?He was wrong because gassing people encourages several behaviors and actions that are bad for society as a whole, and several people in general. If society stops treating any life as special and protected, it's too easy for all life to stop being treated thus. If he can gas jews, that's behavior that hurts everyone in society, and will in the future be used specifically on aryans. I don't know how coherent this is, but I hope you get my point.
So if you were on an island in international water, where you had no fear of legal retribution, would you rape a defenseless woman? Why not?If you want to talk about this in terms of natural rights, Hitler wasn't right or wrong, he just lost. If the Nazis took over, in a few generations anti-semitism would probably become the new form of correctness.
Morals and rights always pertain to whoever has the power and will to implement them. That is all.
Dude, come on. You know what I mean. Civilians.if you look at it from a christian perspective, there are no innocent people, so was hitler still wrong?
Because I'm part of society. I don't want to be hurt. If it's ok for other people to be hurt, it'll too easily lead to me being hurt. Plus, systematic butchery of people is going to have several other negative effects on society that would impact me (can you imagine how hard it'd be to get a good bagel in 1943 Berlin?)You're begging the question. Why is hurting society wrong?
Dude, come on. You know what I mean. Civilians.
Dude, come on. You know what I mean. Civilians.
...and are simply privileges granted by society, was Hitler wrong in gassing innocent people? If so, why?
Yes, because we've always been at war with Eastasia
So if you were on an island in international water, where you had no fear of legal retribution, would you rape a defenseless woman? Why not?
No, because I am the source of all morality. The law is nothing more than a tool to impose my morals upon others.
...and are simply privileges granted by society, was Hitler wrong in gassing innocent people? If so, why?
So if you were on an island in international water, where you had no fear of legal retribution, would you rape a defenseless woman? Why not?
You're begging the question. Why is hurting society wrong?
So if you were on an island in international water, where you had no fear of legal retribution, would you rape a defenseless woman? Why not?
...and are simply privileges granted by society, was Hitler wrong in gassing innocent people? If so, why?
You mean Eurasia, right?
...and are simply privileges granted by society, was Hitler wrong in gassing innocent people? If so, why?
If there were truly no natural rights, what Hitler did wouldn't have morally been wrong (there could be no absolute morality without natural rights).
There are other forms of morality besides your liberal conceptions of natural rights.
Oh, look at Mr. I Don't Read the Entire Post there. I'm pretty sure I brought up social constructs and legal "morality" as well Mr. I Didn't Make it to the End of Your Post and Just Made This on Knee Jerk Reaction. So shove that in your pipe and smoke it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?