heheh....
a preposterous number - even such bilous anti-obamistas as WND won't go further than MAYBE 22%. Best approximation is perhaps 18% (
CNBC et al.)
It doesn't really matter, though, and it does little to bolster your premise to cite such obviously partisan inspired propaganda as 'facts'.
only those of the unemployed as per the designation, the 'official' 9.5% (
Employment Situation Summary) are of any actual relevance when discussing monies gotten from the government. and these are not depending on others, they are depending on the monies THEY, their fellow workers and employers contributed to that express purpose. the gummint only moves the paperwork.
and? no income means no income taxes. the more taxes you spend entitles you to greater public services? or.... public services are allocated without respect to income status? because if it is the former, i hope you are the CEO of a MAJOR, MAJOR international financial corporation or forget calling the fire dept - they will not answer the phone.
get hip, homey, YOU receive in a month far more in benefit from the monies collected in taxes than you could generate in taxes over your lifetime. so, you are living on someone else's dime too.
citation?
translation:
"poor people are disgusting"
translation:
"if i were not just making all this crap up".
enough... this is beyond silly. your assertion is baseless.
wassat mean? jerkin off? no, not at the present... perhaps later.
geo.