lol, no. Administrative warrants are valid warrants to detain/arrest an illegal alien.Doesn't matter because administrative warrants hold no more authority than a dinner menu
Oh, he knows what he's doing. He doesn't believe anything he posts. You have to decide how long you can do this before you get bored.
I saw him following and asking for a warrant. Is that your evidence of obstruction? Pretty weak.There's a ****ing video of what happened. It was posted in the article in the OP of this thread.
Look, feel free to ignore anything and everything that contradicts whatever opinion you have but ignoring the FACTS doesn't make your opinion rational.
Let's think about that for a second. All of you keep screaming about "due process" and if these people are already in the system then they have already had due process so, lawfully, there should be no argument about whether they can be removed or not.They don’t seem to have the paperwork handy
They are coming after the lowest hanging fruit those already in the system. Why not let that play out?
There's video. Lander had locked arms with the undocumented alien and was refusing to let go. They had to pry their arms apart.The paragraph was written by a fox employee. That alone calls it into question. Moreover, a third party's conclusion (see above) re another person's intent....hmmm....seems to me Judge Judy has spent years pointing out that this kind of thing is not admissible in court.
What we're left with is this: walking with an immigrant now seems to be extralegal grounds for a masked and unidentified thug employed and authorized by the trump administration to grab an American citizen from the street and transport him to detention at a facility.....where?
The latest escalation of trump's war on America, on democracy, on the rule of law, and on Americans.
He was requesting a "judicial warrant" and in a removal proceeding under the INA that isn't a requirement. He may as well been asking for a jackalope sandwich...which he was also unlikely to get. Just because he and you are ignorance of the law doesn't make either of you right.I saw him following and asking for a warrant. Is that your evidence of obstruction? Pretty weak.
Did you see obstruction? I didn't.He was requesting a "judicial warrant" and in a removal proceeding under the INA that isn't a requirement. He may as well been asking for a jackalope sandwich...which he was also unlikely to get. Just because he and you are ignorance of the law doesn't make either of you right.
Arrest warrants are the sole authority of the judicial branch.lol, no. Administrative warrants are valid warrants to detain/arrest an illegal alien.
Makes you wonder if ICE has become the brownshirts of our dear Führer Trump.ICE arrested a US citizen in an immigration court.
That US citizen is the NYC comptroller and mayoral candidate.
Reports are also that Lander’s NYPD security was also arrested.
This is a reminder that ICE has no authority over US citizens.
If they don’t want to look like the gestapo… they should stop doing gestapo like things.
NYC mayoral candidate Brad Lander arrested, released by ICE
NYC comptroller and mayoral candidate Brad Lander was arrested by ICE at immigration court Tuesday and there are reports that he will be charged.www.fox5ny.com
He was latched on to the guy ICE was trying to collect!Did you see obstruction? I didn't.
If asking for a warrant is obstruction, then surely you understand why Trump is called a Nazi.
And then unlatched. ICE was not obstructed. Progress was not slowed. The immigrant, who had just received a non-removal order from the court, was escorted out without any obstruction from anyone.He was latched on to the guy ICE was trying to collect!
They need to identify themselves so people wont think they are just an angry klukker.They don't always need a warrant.
Do ICE agents need a warrant to make arrests? Often the answer is no
Questions regarding ICE protocols swirl as Massachusetts communities witness a surge in immigration arrests.www.wbur.org
Administrative warrants are valid warrants to arrest/detain an illegal alien.Arrest warrants are the sole authority of the judicial branch.
I know. Which is why you have no excuse for your ignorance.This is middle school civics stuff, my guy.
Maybe in NAZIland.They don't always need a warrant.
Do ICE agents need a warrant to make arrests? Often the answer is no
Questions regarding ICE protocols swirl as Massachusetts communities witness a surge in immigration arrests.www.wbur.org
I am assuming they are going to try to make the ridiculous claim that he was obstructing them...but for it to be obstruction, they needed to show a warrant...otherwise, it is a lawful action on his part.ICE arrested a US citizen in an immigration court.
That US citizen is the NYC comptroller and mayoral candidate.
Reports are also that Lander’s NYPD security was also arrested.
This is a reminder that ICE has no authority over US citizens.
If they don’t want to look like the gestapo… they should stop doing gestapo like things.
NYC mayoral candidate Brad Lander arrested, released by ICE
NYC comptroller and mayoral candidate Brad Lander was arrested by ICE at immigration court Tuesday and there are reports that he will be charged.www.fox5ny.com
No, they are going through the process and this is just a way to intimidate others from trying to do the process.Let's think about that for a second. All of you keep screaming about "due process" and if these people are already in the system then they have already had due process so, lawfully, there should be no argument about whether they can be removed or not.
"You robbed a bank!"And then unlatched. ICE was not obstructed. Progress was not slowed. The immigrant, who had just received a non-removal order from the court, was escorted out without any obstruction from anyone.
It's Nazi shit. Right in front of your face.
Nazi shit. Own it."You robbed a bank!"
"Yeah, but I dropped the bag so now I can go! It's the law!!!"
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?