• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

ICE agents denied entry to Dodger Stadium

ICE does use body-worn cameras.

AI Overview

Yes, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) does use body-worn cameras. ICE has a policy requiring the use of body-worn cameras (BWCs) by its law enforcement officers and agents when conducting enforcement activities. This policy is intended to enhance transparency and accountability in ICE's operations and build public trust.
 
What if...? said:
No it isn’t.

What it is is a qualification of y’all’s boilerplate responses.

Most if not all of y’all’s responses are “failure to draw the line” fallacies.
Click to expand...
What’s with this y’all stuff? I don’t live in the south nor do you.
 
NatMorton said:
That is a statement about doing their jobs enforcing immigration law and not needing to face recrimination for it, as the context of the reply clearly shows ...

View attachment 67575948

... it had nothing to do with going into Dodger Stadium.
Click to expand...
No it doesn’t, that post clearly refers to all the illegal activity that they are engaged in for the benefit of Trump.
 
Hmm. All those facts correct?

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) responded to the Los Angeles Dodgers' claim that ICE agents were denied entry to Dodger Stadium on June 19, 2025, by clarifying that the agents present were from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), not ICE, and that their presence was unrelated to any enforcement operation. DHS stated on X, “This had nothing to do with the Dodgers. CBP vehicles were in the stadium parking lot very briefly, unrelated to any operation or enforcement.” ICE specifically denied their involvement, posting on X, “False. We were never there.” A CBP official further explained that their vehicles were briefly in the parking lot due to a vehicle malfunction, not for any operation targeting the Dodgers or the stadium. These statements were made to counter the Dodgers' claim and address public concerns amid ongoing immigration enforcement tensions in Los Angeles.​

Federal agents denied entry to Dodger Stadium parking lot: Here is what really happened

A resident captured pictures of vans with the same license plates at Home Depot ICE raids and Dodger Stadium, conflicting with DSH social media posts.
www.latimes.com
​
Los Angeles Dodgers and Trump administration at odds over presence of federal agents at Dodger Stadium​
​
​

Los Angeles Dodgers say they denied Ice agents entry to Dodger Stadium

Baseball team says Ice agents were denied permission to access parking lots but agency claims agents ‘were never there’
www.theguardian.com

There's a difference between U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers and ICE officers.
Further, defeating the push narrative is CBP's "presence was unrelated to any enforcement operation."

It appears the Dodgers ball club was engaged in a bit vacuous virtue signaling here, which started it all.
 
snakestretcher said:
Due process is access to legal representation which the deportees were not afforded. Period.
Click to expand...
That is simply wrong. Someone who is apprehended crossing the border illegally does not have a right to legal representation. They may be returned by the arresting officials immediately.

If you doubt this, look it up.
 
NatMorton said:
That is simply wrong. Someone who is apprehended crossing the border illegally does not have a right to legal representation. They may be returned by the arresting officials immediately.

If you doubt this, look it up.
Click to expand...
You haven't got a clue mate, but keep digging your hole. It isn't just me challenging you, but you persist in stubbornly denying facts.
 
snakestretcher said:
You haven't got a clue mate, but keep digging your hole. It isn't just me challenging you, but you persist in stubbornly denying facts.
Click to expand...
I understand our laws far better than do you, and I've proven my assertion with cites in this thread (see post 433). You, on the other hand, have nothing to back up your opinions, which is normally the case with you.
 
NatMorton said:
I understand our laws far better than do you, and I've proven my assertion with cites in this thread (see post 433). You, on the other hand, have nothing to back up your opinions, which is normally the case with you.
Click to expand...
You have proven nothing-I'm not the only one to have pointed it out.
 
Are we sure they are even government employees performing these actions? I’d bet substantial amounts of money nobody can FOI request 5 seconds of video from these cameras even if they weren’t “malfunctioning” like they always mysteriously do. Probably used the same manufacturer that makes the prison cameras that monitored Tacos pal Jeffery Epstein.
 
NatMorton said:
Explain your reasoning, if you can.
Click to expand...
If someone takes a picture of your license plate, you’re not allowed to jump out of your car and point a gun at them.

If you’re detaining a suspected undocumented immigrant in public and someone is recording you on their phone, you are not allowed to point your gun at them.

If you need a place to stage mass arrests of Los Angeles residents because your president is orchestrating political theater of violence for easily manipulated, terrified-of-immigrant rubes, you don’t get to just break into private property and take it as your own.

Some of the things these supposed federal agents are doing is very illegal. Harassing, arresting, and detaining US citizens for looking hispanic is a violation of rights. Shipping human beings off to die in El Salvadorian death camps, condemning them to death, without a trial is a violation of rights.

You do understand that not everything a brownshirt does is legal, yes?
 
Well, the things they're doing only in your head are certainly illegal, but reality is out here.
 
NatMorton said:
Well, the things they're doing only in your head are certainly illegal, but reality is out here.
Click to expand...
It’s funny how the people who are actually experiencing and even recording what some of these immigration enforcement thugs are doing somehow still isn’t convincing to people who have no idea what’s really happening.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…