Tell that to the IAEA, they tend to disagree.
Really? Would you care to quote the relevant IAEA text that shows this? Because other than news outlets falsifying, exaggerating and outright lying about the report, there is nothing to back up the claim.
From the link I provided above which I suggest you read:
On September 6, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) released a new paper on the implementation of Iran’s Safeguards Agreement which reported that the agency has “continued to verify the non-diversion of declared nuclear material in Iran to any military or other special purpose.”
The article (as you can see from my previous post) explains clearly why Iran have been unfairly targeted and labeled as 'not cooperating'. If you aren't even going to read the material I provide to back up my claims, then how can you debate what I am claiming?
While Israel and Iran have been very close allies during the Pahlavi dynasty, after the Islamic revolution Iran has begun cutting its ties off with Israel, and while 20 years ago the relations were still friendly, they became hostile once Ahmadinejad begun his hate speeches on the Zionist entity and making it the scapegoat of his government.
Before those statements Israel did not regard Iran as an hostile entity and there were really no conflicts between the two nations.
This is completely false. Ahmadinejad did not precipitate the bad feelings towards Israel or the reverse. Considering elements inside Iran have been funding Hamas practically since their birth, I thought you would already be aware of this.
While I find the fact that you debate with cats to be unsurprising, I do not engage in one 'tactic' or another, but merely point out the lack of basis in reality of those conspiracy theories you preach on.
It is common knowledge (or at least I thought it was) that the Arab world dislikes the US because of their foreign policy. They install, prop up and arm brutal dictators who suppress the people of their countries. Just look at the US sponsored Arab regimes kept in power through US funding, arming, training and most importantly political support, at the expense of their populations. For you not to be aware of this is surprising.
And the people of South America feel the exact same way after years of the US installing dictators and suppressing democracy. This is all documented record. It's not even controversial yet you are claiming I am speaking of conspiracy theories?
From a quick Google (which is all I'm inclined to back this up with when it should definitely already be known).
Second half of the 20th Century:
bullet
Relations between Islamic countries and the U.S. were profoundly affected by the west's cold war on communism. U.S. foreign policy promoted the creation and training of terrorist, gorilla, and military units. Usama Bin Laden's group was originally trained by the CIA.
bullet
The U.S. fought the growth of a pan-Arab nationalism in the region. Rather than supporting it as a cohesive force -- a source of stability -- throughout the Middle East, the U.S. encouraged divisions among Islamic states.
bullet
Some believe that the U.S. government supported Fundamentalist religious movements as an additional mechanism to fragment the Arab world.
bullet
Petro-dollars brought enormous wealth to many Muslim countries. Unfortunately, only Turkey out of the 50 or so Islamic countries involved are democracies. The leaders are generally autocratic, unelected, and not particularly accountable to public opinion. Their governments see no need to be responsive to the needs of their people. Civil liberties are sharply curtailed.
bullet
Political commentator Gynne Dyer writes: "The West created the modern Middle East, from its rotten regimes down to its ridiculous borders, and it did so with contemptuous disregard for the wishes of the local people. It is indeed a problem that most Arab governments are corrupt autocracies that breed hatred and despair in their own people, which then fuels terrorism against the West, but it was the West that created the problem -- and invading Iraq won't solve it. If the U.S. really wants to foster Arab democracy, it might try making all that aid to Egypt conditional on prompt democratic reforms. But I wouldn't hold my breath." 11
Why do "they" hate us so much
There are more reasons given if you follow the link (this isn't even half of the ones provided). I would post them all but there are forum restrictions on the amount of material we are allowed to be posted. As you can clearly see, the link backs up my claim.
Unless you believe the empty rhetoric that it's all about freedom and jealousy?
Name the Western countries that you believe are not opposed to a nuclear Iran and I'll refer you with a link to actions/statements taken by those countries that prove otherwise.
You made the claim, therefore the burden of proof is on you. This is how debate works.