• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

I was right about MCA!

I doubt they have these but they are hardly the only determinents of living standards.

They most certainly do have them:




Apparently Saudi Arabia is 77 of countries in the UN Human development index.
HDR 2005 - Country Fact Sheets

76 out of 177, the Ukraine is 77 and how many terrorist are coming out of the Ukraine?




That is the biggest steaming load I have ever seen in my entire life, Marx is a hack. Who are these people that define themselves by their jobs? And again don't like your job? Save your wages, start a bussiness, and hire people to do it for you.
 
They most certainly do have them:
What quality is it though?


76 out of 177, the Ukraine is 77 and how many terrorist are coming out of the Ukraine?
Well here radical Islam comes into play this is a very big factor,there is no such movement in the Ukriane, although I doubt the survey is too accurate on living standards, particularly intangible ones.




That is the biggest steaming load I have ever seen in my entire life, Marx is a hack. Who are these people that define themselves by their jobs? And again don't like your job? Save your wages, start a bussiness, and hire people to do it for you.
Have you read Human action?
Mises is a hack and a fascist supporter.

I'm not a Marxist myself, but how can he be considered a hack, he is called a great economist all the time, he was voted Britain's most liked philospher with over 12% more votes than David Hume the runner up.
I recently read a book called 50 major economists, it is written by a pretty conventional,neoclassical economist and it still claims repeatedly that Smith,Marx and Keynes are the three most important economists ever.

And guess what it doesn't mention Ludwig Von Mises.
 
Last edited:
Well TOT doesn't seem to remember this one at all.

Well, I guess TOT doesn't give a **** about my interests, which is understandable since I don't even know the guy.
 
What quality is it though?


Well here radical Islam comes into play this is a very big factor,there is no such movement in the Ukriane, although I doubt the survey is too accurate on living standards, particularly intangible ones.

You're the one who brought up the survey. Radical Islam is to blame, you tried to pin it on the west, the only people to blame for terrorism are terrorists.





Marx's entire ecomomic theory is based on the horribly flawed LTV, it's a crock of sh!t he was wrong about everything he ever wrote, he's a hack.
 
You're the one who brought up the survey. Radical Islam is to blame, you tried to pin it on the west, the only people to blame for terrorism are terrorists.
I tried to pin it on the west and arab elites actually, please don't lie.
And tell us then why they become terrorists?





Marx's entire ecomomic theory is based on the horribly flawed LTV, it's a crock of sh!t he was wrong about everything he ever wrote, he's a hack.
That must be why he is still so well thought of.
And it is far better than marginalism, that relies on Walras's godlike auctioneer(or he could be a very good central planner!.) to generate prices, how great a theory that is!
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…