Okay, stick a paragraph in there, or whatever other grammar helps you see that - oh wait. 'Talent' set off like that generally means that you disagree with me perceiving what she does as talent?
So it's a double-whammy on her. She's queer 'by choice', and watching her videos - you did watch, yeah? led you to believe she's not talented.
How am I doing?
You're hitting about 50/50 so far.
I don't believe she's all that talented (yes, I watched the first video, I had no interest in watching the second after watching the first). Then again, I've never liked poetry, so I'm probably not very equipped to judge whether or not she's talented in that field. Regardless, you're about right on that part.
On the other half of your statement, you're way off. First off, I agree with you that being homosexual is not a choice for most people. You're either born that way, or you're not. However, what you're presenting here does absolutely dick to support that argument. What does her ability to read/write poetry have to do with being gay. Heck, from those videos, you can't even tell if she's gay or not. She might be, but then again maybe she's just an emo chick who likes to wear men's clothes. I'm not arguing with you whether she is or isn't a lesbian of course, I'm just saying that the videos you posted don't allow us to determine whether she is or is not.
Finally, assuming she IS a lesbian and IS in fact talented, you need to explain exactly how 2 videos of a lesbian woman reading some poetry she wrote proves that she did not choose to be a lesbian, but was instead born that way.
I'm not arguing with your message, but the way you're trying to support it is crap.