• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

I dont agree with the Supreme Court, but they have a point...

Rich2018 said:
Right, let's look shall we?



Post#682, you said:


In Post#417 I said:
"So if the US Constitution were to be replaced, would US citizens no longer be "American" in your mind ?"

So no, I did not say the US Constitution was GOING, to be replaced. I was asking you: IF it were to be, why would US citizens no longer be "American", in your mind ?



So now that your best attempt to wriggle out of your lies has backfired and merely confirmed your dishonesty:

1. Are you going to retract it and apologize
(You talked earlier of being "man enough" - so let's see if you are

2. Answer the damn question abut why US citizens would cease to be "American", were the Constitution to be replaced

And stop LYING !!!
Click to expand...

Quote the lie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PoS
PoS said:
I mean, abortion isnt mentioned in the Constitution, so technically it was beyond their scope of responsibilities, right?

What's wrong with giving the decision on it over to the states? This weakens the grip of federal power over the whole country, which is a good thing.

Im pro-choice, btw. Just in case anyone wants to know.
Click to expand...
"Anything herein not reserved to the federal government is given to the states or the people." I actually think this is one of those "people powers" that politicians ignore.
 
Rich2018 said:
Right, let's look shall we?



Post#682, you said:


In Post#417 I said:
"So if the US Constitution were to be replaced, would US citizens no longer be "American" in your mind ?"

So no, I did not say the US Constitution was GOING, to be replaced. I was asking you: IF it were to be, why would US citizens no longer be "American", in your mind ?



So now that your best attempt to wriggle out of your lies has backfired and merely confirmed your dishonesty:

1. Are you going to retract it and apologize
(You talked earlier of being "man enough" - so let's see if you are

2. Answer the damn question abut why US citizens would cease to be "American", were the Constitution to be replaced


And stop LYING !!!
Click to expand...
What did I lie about? Quote me.
CaughtInThe said:
I said militant. You added terrorism. We see you.
Click to expand...
Militants can be terrorists, so its obvious you love extremism. Im not surprised.
PoliSciPulse said:
"Anything herein not reserved to the federal government is given to the states or the people." I actually think this is one of those "people powers" that politicians ignore.
Click to expand...
Well, isnt the state government the people too?
 
PoS said:
What did I lie about? Quote me.

Militants can be terrorists, so its obvious you love extremism. Im not surprised.

Well, isnt the state government the people too?
Click to expand...
Yes, but the people and state government in that particular clause are listed out as two separate groups. Otherwise, it would have been "Anything herein not resolved to the federal government is given to the states."

Sort of like if the 2nd Amendment said, "The right to bear cannons, muskets, and rifles shall not be infringed" instead of "bear arms."
 
PoS said:
Militants can be terrorists, so its obvious you love extremism. Im not surprised.
Click to expand...
I said militant and you added terrorism. Just man up and admit it.
 
PoS said:
What did I lie about? Quote me.
Click to expand...

Post#682:
You made up the lie that the Constitution is going to be replaced. Show proof that it will be.
Click to expand...

I NEVER said that. The lie was yours
STOP LYING !!!

And take your own advice and be "man enough" to retract and apologize.
 
PoliSciPulse said:
Yes, but the people and state government in that particular clause are listed out as two separate groups. Otherwise, it would have been "Anything herein not resolved to the federal government is given to the states."

Sort of like if the 2nd Amendment said, "The right to bear cannons, muskets, and rifles shall not be infringed" instead of "bear arms."
Click to expand...

SCOTUS would rule that, that list included Colt 45's.
 
Rich2018 said:
SCOTUS would rule that, that list included Colt 45's.
Click to expand...
It is easy to say that in today's political climate. However, had the Constitution laid out specifics, less would be left up to interpretation. Oh, don't get me wrong, there would still be a National Revolutionary Arms Association :p
 
Rich2018 said:
Post#682:


I NEVER said that. The lie was yours
STOP LYING !!!

And take your own advice and be "man enough" to retract and apologize.
Click to expand...
That was your quote, not mine. So you did lie. Thanks for admitting it.

CaughtInThe said:
I said militant and you added terrorism. Just man up and admit it.
Click to expand...
You love terrorists. Just man up and admit it.
 
PoliSciPulse said:
It is easy to say that in today's political climate. However, had the Constitution laid out specifics, less would be left up to interpretation. Oh, don't get me wrong, there would still be a National Revolutionary Arms Association :p
Click to expand...

Yes you're right, but then an ambiguous style is a trait of the Constitution.
 
PoS said:
That was your quote, not mine. So you did lie. Thanks for admitting it.
Click to expand...

You lie again

Post#682:
You made up the lie that the Constitution is going to be replaced. Show proof that it will be.
Click to expand...

That is YOUR quote and I never said that. The lie was yours
STOP LYING !!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom