• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hurricane Season Four "Myths About Hurricanes"

Which of these "myths" do you believe in, and why or why not?


  • Total voters
    7
The guy in the video with the generators, you know the one who only wanted to "help" people, by selling them generators at twice what he paid for them, what a crock of shit. If he paid $700 ea for 19 generators and tried to sell them for $1400 ea he belongs in jail. If his motives were truly altruistic he could have sold them for enough to cover his truck rental and fuel, but he tried to make a $13000 profit and wants us to feel sorry for him.
 
absolutely no empirical evidence to back this up. This was actually a mild season.like they say about weather and real estate :
"location location location" is what matters
Yeah, strongest recorded hurricanes is just a coincidence.
 
It wasn't mentioned because it doesn't fit the narrative. Can't be talking about how the government helps out in a crisis like a hurricane because "GOVERNMENT BAAAAD!" KMA

This is a deflection from the actual topic. :rolleyes:

Why does your side of the argument always try to do this?

If you think your point is important, create a thread and discuss it.

But always trying to lead a discussion off on a different tangent simply because you can't make some point on the one proposed is not a valid debate tactic.

It is a logical fallacy; either a red herring or a straw man. In this case a red herring. (n)
 
Yes. There are a large number of factors, natural and manmade that are contributing to the warming. We know that the planet is getting hotter(we can measure this), and we have a very good idea of the causes, and a rough idea how much each of those causes is contributing. It is however a massively complex system, so while we can say "man made effects are significantly contributing to global warming", that is about as accurate as we can get.

So the answer to your question is that it is both, and more.
ya but i dont buy the "significant" part .. The science (real data) doesnt back the claim of AGW global warming.
The modeling used are assumptive.
 
Back
Top Bottom