• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hunter Biden Took $3.5 Million From Ex-Moscow Mayor’s Wife

What is the crime? (BTW, that is the exact argument you TDS filled Trump enabling Republicans keep asking.)
 
And...it keeps getting worse.....

Senate Report Links Hunter Biden to Human Trafficking Ring



Meanwhile democrats are furiously searching for the Trump pee tape, only to find it was Biden. HAHAHA!!
Did he knowingly pay prostitutes who were trafficked? Were the prostitutes underage?

If not, then the legality of him hiring prostitutes is based on the company it happened in and whether they want to pursue it.

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
 
https://thefederalist.com/2020/09/23/hunter-biden-took-3-5-million-from-ex-moscow-mayors-wife/

Well, well...it looks like we found the Russia connection that Democrats have been looking for.

Phew, good thing Hunter Biden isn't running for the presidency. Speaking of someone who is, how much money does Trump owe the Russians? And whose son is it that just got ordered to testify, since his daddy's criminal organization is now under investigation for tax fraud and the like?

Right. Eric Trump. Because the Trump organization is a bunch of crooks.
 
Biden is officially toast.....bow out Joe or off to prison for you and your son. This is serious news.....now, for the rest of the story. Wow, will the true Russian Colluder please step forward, lol.....see ya Joe.

Man, you people will swallow anything.

:ROFLMAO:



What's the crime supposed to be? What is he actually supposed to have done? Received payments while being the VP's son?

(And to think I'm asking a Trumpist, who has no problem with Trump refusing to divest himself from his businesses and instead actively steering government money to them)
 
Phew, good thing Hunter Biden isn't running for the presidency. Speaking of someone who is, how much money does Trump owe the Russians? And whose son is it that just got ordered to testify, since his daddy's criminal organization is now under investigation for tax fraud and the like?

Right. Eric Trump. Because the Trump organization is a bunch of crooks.

Objection! Whataboutism! You're out of order, Councilor!
 
Objection! Whataboutism! You're out of order, Councilor!

Another Trumpist who doesn't know what words mean and simply shouts whatever he thinks sounds negative.

Clue: a whattaboutism says "this thing you are talking about is OK because someone else did it", though Trumpists usually go for the "look, a squirrel!" variant.


Pointing out that the person you are trying to smear isn't even running is a direct comment on the topic.

Pointing out that you have zero credibility because you cheer on Trump as he does far worse (not divesting, steering government funds to his businesses, etc) and got far more money from Russia once U.S. banks stopped lending is not a "whattaboutism" (study the clue until you get it). Saying that you have no credibility to complain about corruption given your stance regarding a corrupt person does not say what Hunter Biden allegedly did is OK. It says you aren't the person with standing to talk about it, since you obviously don't care about corruption.

Of course, it would seem from all the threads on this that this is just another bullshit Trumpist hoax based on unverified claims which themselves do not allege anything criminal, rather, the only way they look criminal is if one already assumed that Hunter Biden must be guilty of something.


Hope this helps.
 
https://thefederalist.com/2020/09/23/hunter-biden-took-3-5-million-from-ex-moscow-mayors-wife/



Well, well...it looks like we found the Russia connection that Democrats have been looking for.


Well, let's see: "The report details how Biden's business received a $3.5 million payment from Baturina in February 2014, which was described to be for "consultancy" work. In 2015, Biden also received several payments of several hundred thousand dollars from Baturina, several of which were listed as part of a "loan agreement." ---Newsweek.

If Hunter were running for office, I think he'd have to withdraw, but he if had to withdraw, then why not Trump? Trump received a $500,000,000 loan from Deutsche Bank, and at the time he received that loan, A State Russian Bank ( which mean's Putin's bank ) loaned Deutsche Bank about the same amount, so that means Trump's 'loan' came directly from Putin, via Deutsche Bank. On top of this, the current Commerce Secretary, Wilbur Ross, was, at the time, head of the real estate loan department at Deutsche Bank who handled the loan.

But, of course, republicans do not have a problem with the President doing that, they only have a problem with someone who isn't even holding a public office of any kind desperately clinging to the hope that some negativity of the black sheep in Biden's family will rub off on Biden, noting that Trump family is rife with black sheep, corruption, self-dealing, and the like.

Nor do Republicans have a problem with nepotism, noting that Ivanka secured millions of dollars worth of trademarks from China, DURING the time Trump was negotiating with china, and one of those trademarks was for a COFFIN. Great timing in the era of Covid, eh?
 
Last edited:
This is just the beginning. Many threads still need to be pulled to unravel this one.

I wonder if there are any emails out there?
 
Ewww...is that what you're interested in?

Weird.
I'm interested in finding out where exactly this was a crime. What US laws does this relate to. If he paid for underage sex, and there is evidence to support that, charge him. If this is him paying for a prostitute who willingly sold him her services, that should be their business. If it was against the law in that country, it is for them to charge him if they even still could (willing to bet even other countries have a statute of limitation on prostitution charges).

In reality, this appears to be another game of Six Degrees of Separation to Kevin Bacon. Making a vague monetary connection to someone who may have been into trafficking OR may have been making porn, or could have simply been involved in prostitution.

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
 
Man, you people will swallow anything.

:ROFLMAO:



What's the crime supposed to be? What is he actually supposed to have done? Received payments while being the VP's son?

(And to think I'm asking a Trumpist, who has no problem with Trump refusing to divest himself from his businesses and instead actively steering government money to them)

Coming from a russia collusion believer...now that's funny.
 
Coming from a russia collusion believer...now that's funny.

What's a "russia collusion believer"?

Mueller found that every element of criminal conspiracy was proven, his only saving grace is that he didn't leave evidence of an explicit agreement. You know what "explicit" means, right?

He invited and knowingly accepted interference on his behalf, not going to the authorities. He knew about it. He just didn't leave a signed document. That is what you want to defend, just because a Democrat accused him of doing what he did?

Why do you hate America so much?

What happened to "we have to vote for Romney because Russia is our greatest geopolitical foe and Obama is 'weak' on Russia"?

Yeah, don't bother responding. It'll just be recycled crap. It flies in the bar, but not because it makes sense; it flies because it's virtue-signalling. Specifically, the "I hate Librulz!" virtue.
 
What's a "russia collusion believer"?

Mueller found that every element of criminal conspiracy was proven, his only saving grace is that he didn't leave evidence of an explicit agreement. You know what "explicit" means, right?

He invited and knowingly accepted interference on his behalf, not going to the authorities. He knew about it. He just didn't leave a signed document. That is what you want to defend, just because a Democrat accused him of doing what he did?

Why do you hate America so much?

What happened to "we have to vote for Romney because Russia is our greatest geopolitical foe and Obama is 'weak' on Russia"?

Yeah, don't bother responding. It'll just be recycled crap. It flies in the bar, but not because it makes sense; it flies because it's virtue-signalling. Specifically, the "I hate Librulz!" virtue.

No need for the emotional rant. With cultists even with all the evidence coming forward they still love the lie...incredible.

I love America. Which is why I love our electoral process, unlike many haters of America who have been trying to remove our duly elected President since before being sworn in.
 
Back
Top Bottom