• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How will the Democrats try to demonize Ann C Barrett

How will the Democrats attack Judge Barrett's nomination?

  • Claiming she is too young

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Arguing that Notre Dame is not a good enough law school

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    31
I'm concerned that Barrett will help overturn the ACA and RvW because of her religious views.

I think the SC has become too political and needs reform if it wants to remain credible.
 
What will be the attack strategy against Judge Barrett

They could start by quoting her verbatim on the Garland nomination where she said it was justified to wait because that seat was a pivotal conservative seat that would swing the court to the left. Just play the clip and ask her if she still believes that given she is replacing RBG. Just keep pounding it into her and make her explain herself.
 
Aww, c’mon man. You know Ted is a liar. Just ask any Democrat. (Although didn’t Trump call him one also. I know he called someone that).
Yeah, lol, they're going to have to now call both Trump and Cruz liars.
 
I hope it doesn't...but her opinions highly suggests it will.
I mean, she's not going to support the ACA, she's a conservative.

But I seriously doubt it would have anything to do with her religious beliefs.
 
The Constitution says, Obama and Democrats were UNCONSTITUTIONALLY ripped off of their pick.

No, it really doesn’t. I think what McConnell did was dirty pool, but it did not violate the Constitution from what I’ve read. Obama made his nomination as specified, but nowhere does it require his nominee will be approved.
 
The Left hates Jesus...nuff said
Actually, the left is quite fond of Jesus's socialist teachings. Check out the Gospel of Mathew. The Redeemer is to the left of Bernie, for crying out loud! We go to hell if we don't feed the hungry, clothe the naked, visit jails, welcome refugees, etc. And let's not get started on the Sermon on the Mount. Aside from the sex stuff, what leftist could object?
 
Some days you get the bear, some days the bear gets you.”

The Democrats need to put their head down and take the licks and move on........

”God give me the strength to change those things that I can and accept those things that I cannot........”
 
She'll vote to take away Americans' health care protections, overturn Roe V. Wade, continue to rule against voting rights and will vote to block every single Democratic legislative policy regardless of how completely they dominate the November election.

That's all anyone needs to know.

Spot on. And exactly the line of attacks the Dems are and will be focusing on.

Health care, health care, health care.
 
I'm going to say her Catholicism and claiming that she is a Christian extremist.

Yes and no. GEtting her on the ACA wouln’t touch her religion. That would be Roe. And the GOP are going to do as much heavy lifting there as anyone else. Josh Hawley said he wants a roe-killer on the court, by god. And he’s gonna get one.
 
The best one I've heard is she'll do what the Pope tells her to do.

The problem for conservatives is this: The current Pope is a flaming liberal nutjob.
Yeah, he showed some compassion towards gays, divorced Catholics, atheists, the poor, even a transgender guy, sort of like Jesus might have. Who does he think he is, St. Francis, that other nut job?
 
No, it really doesn’t. I think what McConnell did was dirty pool, but it did not violate the Constitution from what I’ve read. Obama made his nomination as specified, but nowhere does it require his nominee will be approved.
tHAT IS THE PROBLEM. most rules are rules, not laws, so the right wing thinks rules are ONLY for Democrats.
 
No, it really doesn’t. I think what McConnell did was dirty pool, but it did not violate the Constitution from what I’ve read. Obama made his nomination as specified, but nowhere does it require his nominee will be approved.
It is known they didn't have the votes in the Senate - or the Senate could have ignored there being no hearings and confirmed the nomination anyway.

What happened is what has always happened. If the Senate is the opposing party in an election year, the nominee is rejected. If they are of the same party, the confirmation proceeds.
 
Yeah, he showed some compassion towards gays, divorced Catholics, atheists, the poor, even a transgender guy, sort of like Jesus might have. Who does he think he is, St. Francis, that other nut job?
So tell me...if you prevent ACB from getting confirmed, are you just screwing yourself?
 
She'll vote to take away Americans' health care protections, overturn Roe V. Wade, continue to rule against voting rights and will vote to block every single Democratic legislative policy regardless of how completely they dominate the November election.

That's all anyone needs to know.
And none of that is proven to be true. How about the left is just afraid she will rule on the law as is written and not on how she wishes it were written like most liberals.
 
And none of that is proven to be true. How about the left is just afraid she will rule on the law as is written and not on how she wishes it were written like most liberals.

She's got a lot on her hands in the coming year. Should Democrats retake the Senate and the White House and keep the House, they'll be sure to give her four our six extra hands to assist her in the loaded docket to come.
 
What will be the attack strategy against Judge Barrett

She is white, religious, articulate, rational, and dedicated to interpreting the consitution how it was written and intended-- and therefore unwilling to subvert it to follow a different agenda. She is everything that scares a liberal progressive socialist anti patriotic anti God Democrat... like a bucket of water scares a witch, or the sunlight scares Dracula. Amy Barrett is the face of all that they hate. She represents everything they want to change America from being--and into something else. She isn't AOC, she isn't BLM/Antifa, she isn't Kamala Harris, she isn't Satan himself.
 
So tell me...if you prevent ACB from getting confirmed, are you just screwing yourself?
Not if she shows the same compassion and sense of justice Jesus showed in Mathew's gospel. But I fear that working people, women and the environment may suffer under her opinions.
 
Back
Top Bottom