• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

How The Trump Campaign Weakened The Republican Platform On Aid To Ukraine (1 Viewer)

Hmm... Trump appears to agree with Obama (on a single small point) so Trump, not Obama, is pro-Putin (has ties to Moscow?) because of that (identical?) position. Where Hillary stands or the demorat Ukriaine platform position is, of course, not mentioned. ;)
 
Last edited:
SHOOTER said:
THE WASHINGTON POST ,i am still laughing,are you kidding me jeff bozos hates TRUMP and loves the liberal left,no BIAS there .
run don run
Click to expand...

Trump is a part of the "liberal left." There must be another reason why he's disliked.
 
SHOOTER said:
THE WASHINGTON POST ,i am still laughing,are you kidding me jeff bozos hates TRUMP and loves the liberal left,no BIAS there .
run don run
Click to expand...

What a wonderful example of: "Let's ignore whatever that person says, not because he's right or wrong, but because of who that person is." FACTS do not care who says those facts. All that matters is the accuracy of the FACTS. The political lean of the one talking simply doesn't matter - what DOES matter is the accuracy of the facts.

And I'm no hypocrite on this one. If you give references from The Daily Caller or Breitbart or even Limbaugh, I'll still read what's there, to see if maybe the guy might have a point, to see if what the guy is saying is accurate and factual. Sometimes they're factual - sometimes they have a point...

...but the point is, it's flat wrong to ASSUME - as you just did - that the Post's article is not factual or accurate.

In other words, learn to judge what is said by whether it is factual and accurate...and NOT just by who said it.
 
Glen Contrarian said:
What a wonderful example of: "Let's ignore whatever that person says, not because he's right or wrong, but because of who that person is." FACTS do not care who says those facts. All that matters is the accuracy of the FACTS. The political lean of the one talking simply doesn't matter - what DOES matter is the accuracy of the facts.

And I'm no hypocrite on this one. If you give references from The Daily Caller or Breitbart or even Limbaugh, I'll still read what's there, to see if maybe the guy might have a point, to see if what the guy is saying is accurate and factual. Sometimes they're factual - sometimes they have a point...

...but the point is, it's flat wrong to ASSUME - as you just did - that the Post's article is not factual or accurate.

In other words, learn to judge what is said by whether it is factual and accurate...and NOT just by who said it.
Click to expand...

i am still laughing hull.


run don run
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top Bottom