• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

how many pro lifers think zimmerman is innocent ?

for pro lifers about zimmerman case

  • yes

    Votes: 10 71.4%
  • no

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • l dont know

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • other

    Votes: 4 28.6%

  • Total voters
    14
murder is murder no matter why it is commited!!!!!!!

No.

Murder is always killing. Killing is not always murder. Simple fact. When someone defends themselves with lethal force in defense of their own life, it is in no way murder.
 
murder is murder no matter why it is commited!!!!!!!

No, killing in self-defense is not murder, it is justifiable homicide.

If you can call killing in self-defense "murder," then I can call abortion "murder." In reality, neither is illegal, therefore neither is actually murder. Murder is a specific criminal charge, and it is illegal.


Killing in self-defense should not be illegal, as it is not aggressive; this is why we say killing is self-defense is justifiable.

Abortion, however, is aggressive. It is not justifiable. Yet it is stupidly legal.
 
Last edited:
yes l have been posting in that crazy forum for few days since zimmerman was found innocent and realized it is usually cons,libertarians etc who defend zimmerman

many of them are also pro lifers who think abortion is murder or like murder

just be honest and vote please
thank you all

Zimmerman was found NOT GUILTY of the charges against him. Not innocent. There is a difference.

Also, I'm conservative/libertarian by I'm actually pro-choice.

So, Yeah.
 
yes l have been posting in that crazy forum for few days since zimmerman was found innocent and realized it is usually cons,libertarians etc who defend zimmerman

many of them are also pro lifers who think abortion is murder or like murder

just be honest and vote please
thank you all

What a stupid poll.

I'm pro-life but if a fetus was beating his/her mother's head into the sidewalk I wouldn't consider the mother a murderer if she aborted.
 
murder is murder no matter why it is commited!!!!!!!

So if someone broke in your house and started punching you and telling you he's going to kill you, you wouldn't defend yourself because you wouldn't want to murder anybody?

I guess you consider all war murder then too seeing as how you see all self defense as murder.
 
expected

pro lifers focus on fetus rights rather than human rights


Dear lady, most of us are focused on the established fact that TM assaulted Zim in a manner known to cause serious harm or sometimes death, as the justification for the shooting.

There is zero relationship between this and abortion.
 
murder is murder no matter why it is commited!!!!!!!


Dear, you really need to think this through a bit.

A court and jury has judged this action as legally justified, as not-murder; specifically, they've decided that the available evidence indicates TM was assaulting GZ in a manner that could cause grave bodily harm or death, meaning that GZ shot in self-defense. Self-defense is not murder.
 
yes l have been posting in that crazy forum for few days since zimmerman was found innocent and realized it is usually cons,libertarians etc who defend zimmerman

many of them are also pro lifers who think abortion is murder or like murder

just be honest and vote please
thank you all


Pro-life is the opposition to legalized abortion.It does not mean you are supposed to oppose all wars, the death penalty or using lethal force to defend yourself form getting your head bashed into the pavement.
 
Dear lady, most of us are focused on the established fact that TM assaulted Zim in a manner known to cause serious harm or sometimes death, as the justification for the shooting.

There is zero relationship between this and abortion.

hi goshh:2wave:

it is said he was following martin and tahts why l believe martin's act was a self defense

he shouldnt have followed martin

l think we can agree on this
 

if someone follows you wont you be in self defense jamews

some friends claim l have not enough information about this case althought l started it

it means the other americans who think zimmerman is guilty dont follow this trial either
 
yes l have been posting in that crazy forum for few days since zimmerman was found innocent and realized it is usually cons,libertarians etc who defend zimmerman

many of them are also pro lifers who think abortion is murder or like murder

just be honest and vote please
thank you all

Zimmerman didn't murder Martin as Martin was attacking him. He was not innocent or defenseless and therefore the shooting was justified.
 
Zimmerman didn't murder Martin as Martin was attacking him. He was not innocent or defenseless and therefore the shooting was justified.

so zimmerman thought he was not innocent and decided to follow him ?

why didnt he call police if he suspected he was a thread?
 
so zimmerman thought he was not innocent and decided to follow him ?

why didnt he call police if he suspected he was a thread?

He did call police......

If this is going to be another thread where people ignore the facts........good grief.
 
also l wonder why the jury consisted of 5 whites

it is interesting too
 
okay so why did he have to follow him ?

calling police seems invalid in this case

he shouldnt have followed him

The dispatch was asking him questions, which would make one think they need more info and have reason to follow him. You also forget that he didn't jump Zimmerman until AFTER Zimmerman quit following him. Zimmerman was not in the wrong here, Martin was.
 
The dispatch was asking him questions, which would make one think they need more info and have reason to follow him. You also forget that he didn't jump Zimmerman until AFTER Zimmerman quit following him. Zimmerman was not in the wrong here, Martin was.


if you believe someone is a potential criminal you call the police and wait

you dont follow him


some witnesses claim they heard martin's scream for help

why did martin have to ask " why do you follow me "?
 
if you believe someone is a potential criminal you call the police and wait

you dont follow him


some witnesses claim they heard martin's scream for help

why did martin have to ask " why do you follow me "?

What witness claimed that? Second, there is no law against following somebody. Third, Martin had no right to jump Zimmerman, especially since Zimmerman had QUIT following him. Please stick to the facts.
 
But are you interested in the facts of the case? Or do you want to keep it racial. The incident was NOT racial.

are you sure l am doing it or you ?

l am not black
 
also l wonder why the jury consisted of 5 whites

it is interesting too

It didn't. Educate yourself before speaking, Medusa.
 
Back
Top Bottom