• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How Long Untll Impeachment 2.0?

How Long Before Another Impeachment?

  • Total voters
    22
Rexedgar

Rexedgar

Yo-Semite!
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Apr 6, 2017
Messages
58,218
Reaction score
46,569
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
If Trump wins a second term, how long before another impeachment proceeding begins?
 
Rexedgar said:
If Trump wins a second term, how long before another impeachment proceeding begins?
Click to expand...
There's no predicting the insanity of the left.
 
Bullseye said:
There's no predicting the insanity of the left.
Click to expand...

The better question would be, how long before leftist heads explode if Trump gets reelected?
The day after the election 2020
Thanksgiving Day 2020
Christmas Day 2020
The first or the last day of Hanukkah 2020
New Years Day 2021
Inauguration Day 2021
Valentine's Day 2021
Won’t Happen
 
Rexedgar said:
If Trump wins a second term, how long before another impeachment proceeding begins?
Click to expand...
Haven’t you heard? It already started.
 
They already sustained too much damage for their previous attempt. They don't dare try it again.

They want to have a chance in 2024.
 
Rexedgar said:
If Trump wins a second term, how long before another impeachment proceeding begins?
Click to expand...

I voted for "won't happen" because he is going to lose the election.

If enough people like Donald Trump to keep him in the White House, Congress will be more like what it was in 2017.
 
Last edited:
Well if the democrats win the house and senate then I think shortly after January. He has already been impeached. The senate could vote to remove him from office. Got to get rid of Pence though.

Then we have president Pelosi
 
LouC said:
January 21st, 2021.

I hope and pray.
Click to expand...

Not possible.

You don't want that to happen because it would mean four years of Mike Pence instead of Joe Biden.
 
rickc said:
Well if the Democrats win the House and Senate then I think shortly after January. He has already been impeached. The Senate could vote to remove him from office. Got to get rid of Pence though.

Then we have President Pelosi.
Click to expand...

The only way to get rid of Mike Pence is vote for Kamala Harris.

Winning the Senate back would not result in a conviction anyway. There must be at least 67 votes in favor of it and Democrats will not have that many.
 
Last edited:
If he loses I am more inclined to bet he will be indicted shortly after he leaves office...first by the State of NY and then the feds.
 
Blue Donkey said:
The only way to get rid of Mike Pence is vote for Kamala Harris.

Winning the Senate back would not result in a conviction anyway. There must be at least 67 votes in favor of it and Democrats will not have that many.
Click to expand...

Kamala Harris is one of the worst POS to ever be on a major ticket. Maybe the worst.
 
trixare4kids said:
The better question would be, how long before leftist heads explode if Trump gets reelected?
The day after the election 2020
Thanksgiving Day 2020
Christmas Day 2020
The first or the last day of Hanukkah 2020
New Years Day 2021
Inauguration Day 2021
Valentine's Day 2021
Won’t Happen
Click to expand...

Immediately and violently.
 
It will start just like last time, within minutes of his sweating in, now at his second term.
 
TurtleDude said:
Kamala Harris is one of the worst POS to ever be on a major ticket. Maybe the worst.
Click to expand...

Are you presenting this ^^^ as an 'opinion' or a 'statement of fact'? If it's the former, your personal 'opinion' duly noted. If it's the latter, you have a Burden of Proof to meet, or the positive claim is dismissed.
 
Is impeachment inevitable now everytime the opposition party has a majority in the house?

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
 
Blue Donkey said:
You forgot about Sarah Palin.
Click to expand...

Palin wasn't a quota pick who slept with a much older man to get appointments. She never flunked the bar and she didn't propose far left nonsense. Harris, who had a parent teaching at Stanford, and had affirmative action benefits, couldn't even get into the top three law schools in California. She isn't very bright
 
Logician Man said:
Are you presenting this ^^^ as an 'opinion' or a 'statement of fact'? If it's the former, your personal 'opinion' duly noted. If it's the latter, you have a Burden of Proof to meet, or the positive claim is dismissed.
Click to expand...

yet another thread where your first post is a stupid complaint about something I wrote. You can scream that my comments are dismissed until the second coming and your arguments will still appear to be based on obsession and silliness
 
TurtleDude said:
yet another thread where your first post is a stupid complaint about something I wrote. You can scream that my comments are dismissed until the second coming and your arguments will still appear to be based on obsession and silliness
Click to expand...

Your dodge/diversion aside, is your proclamation being presented as your personal 'opinion', or being presented as a 'statement of fact'? If it's the latter, you have a burden of proof to meet. Since you have presented no B of P, the logical conclusion is your proclamation is merely your 'opinion', and is in no manner at all based in 'fact.' ( accepted debating protocol 101 )
 
Logician Man said:
Your dodge/diversion aside, is your proclamation being presented as your personal 'opinion', or being presented as a 'statement of fact'? If it's the latter, you have a burden of proof to meet. Since you have presented no B of P, the logical conclusion is your proclamation is merely your 'opinion', and is in no manner at all based in 'fact.' ( accepted debating protocol 101 )
Click to expand...

why do you continue to post to me when I have told you that until you actually start meeting the terms that you demand others meet, I won't answer your stupid questions. Why have you jumped on over 65 threads only to attack my post without adding anything else to the thread?
 
Blue Donkey said:
He will vote for Trump.
Click to expand...

It is the best of two choices for anyone who is a gun owner, a high net tax payer and a supporter of law and order-versus anarchy and violent rioting and looting
 
TurtleDude said:
Palin wasn't a quota pick who slept with a much older man to get appointments. She never flunked the bar and she didn't propose far left nonsense. Harris, who had a parent teaching at Stanford, and had affirmative action benefits, couldn't even get into the top three law schools in California. She isn't very bright.
Click to expand...

Many bright law students don't get in one of those colleges. Do you know for a fact she tried to do it and got rejection letters? Is it possible she chose to study law somewhere else?

Of course Sarah Palin did not propose far left nonsense - because she proposed far-right nonsense.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom