- Joined
- Sep 15, 2012
- Messages
- 28,833
- Reaction score
- 10,060
- Location
- Columbus, OH
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Nope. He felt out murdered people
Fortunately the video evidence exposes your slander.
Nope. He felt out murdered people
You lose the self defense excuse when you kill someone first
People have a right to use reasonable force to subdue him since he is an active threat
Fortunately the video evidence exposes your slander.
Not according to the DA
We have judges and juries to put DA’s in their place. This is unlikely ever to see trial.
It's really not that difficult of a law to interpret.
And the D.A. will be eating crow when Rittenhouse walks.The DA has a different legal opinion
They attacked him with lethal force. That's how it's self-defense.
And the D.A. will be eating crow when Rittenhouse walks.
Or maybe the DA has seen the evidence and thinks he is guilty
How was he illegally armed?
Anything is possible. After I saw that idiot in Atlanta charge the cop that shot Rayshard Brooks with murder I'll believe that any DA is capable of believing and prosecuting anything.
He's being charged with first degree murder, too, which is spurious. He wasn't hunting, and he's over 16, so he was in compliance of 29.304 and 29593, which only apply when you are hunting. The prohibition of someone under 18 from openly carrying a dangerous weapon only applies in the case of it being a short barreled rifle or short barreled shotgun, neither of which he was carrying.
According to Wisconsin law, he was carrying legally.
And any trumper will believe any white guy is always right....even if they have their knee on the neck of a black man
As soon as he ran and tried to remove himself from the situation then the ones chasing him become the aggressors. That's when it became a self defense situation. He only shot when he was unable to retreat any further. All that has to be proven is there a legitimate claim of threat to bodily harm or death.
Not according to the DA
bwahahahahahahahahaha!!!!! Are you serious dude? AR15.com? LOL!!!!
Here's a legal analysts from a lawyer who is licenced in Wisconsin. I haven't listened to the entire thing myself, but he does cover Wisconsin's self defense laws.
Link
...what?You know what I wonder, If Trump will have Barr take this whole thing over and rule it to be self defense. Would not surprise me at all.
NEWSFLASH: He was in Wisconsin, not Illinois! Illinois law means, as the Brits say, **** all in Wisconsin.He is from Illinois where you have to be 18 to open carry.
The man without a weapon threw a plastic bag at him. I guess that is lethal force to a whimp.
SO if you see someone kill someone and then leave you would not follow and when there were police available yell to them that the person had shot a person. It was not the followers fault he fell and they came up on him. They would have seen him as a continuing threat to others. If this was a BLM member you would be yelling hang the bastard.