- Joined
- Sep 13, 2014
- Messages
- 19,612
- Reaction score
- 7,713
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Your comments are miles form the truth of what I said.
They are exactly what you said. You meant something else? Care to explain?
Your comments are miles form the truth of what I said.
Well, that's a sort of open ended question. I think that modern military style assault weapons, quick release magazine change buttons and all high capacity magazines/ clips should be restricted from the market until the country can get control of the threat they pose within the criminal element and the proliferation of such weaponry in the country is thinned to all but nonexistence. Very hard restrictions on imports of such weaponry should be put to use, wherein such weaponry is banned from importation during the period of time it takes. Extremely tough penalties should be placed on criminals who use such weaponry in the commission of their crimes: perhaps 10 years for a first offense. That alone should have some effect.
The weapons you would ban are responsible for like 1% of shooting deaths and there is already penalties you ask for they are just not enforced.
The more I read his posts, the more I see a desire to make the rest of the USA suffer the same idiotic laws california imposes on its gun owners. Who knows, he might be some low level bureaucrat in California. The same mindless excuses California purveys for its stupid laws are brought here by him
You didn't offer a rebuttal to my point at all. All you did was dance around my point instead of actually trying to address it.
And I've already explained my rebuttal to you, but I'll state it for you again:
"Banning assault rifles would only create a violent black market and make the problem even worse."
I refuted that opinion. So, how would it make it worse?
The weapons you would ban are responsible for like 1% of shooting deaths and there is already penalties you ask for they are just not enforced.
Ugh. No you didn't. Like I said, all you did was dance around it like a ballerina.
And It's pretty self-evident to see why creating a violent black market for assault rifles would make things even worse.
I refuted that opinion. So, how would it make it worse?
Sorry, but I don't think you know what you're talking about. s I said, the Black market is already violent, that's why it;s called a black market: it's full of thugs and thieves and murderers. Thinning out the assault rifle population among them will only help the rest of us.
I'm not banning them. In several states they are already banned. There was a federal ban as well and everybody and the second amendment survived. We just don't want crazies or terrorists mowing people down with them. Your rhetoric sounds as though it's okay in your mind for US terrorists to have them.
What makes you think laws apply to the lawless?Sorry, but I don't think you know what you're talking about. s I said, the Black market is already violent, that's why it;s called a black market: it's full of thugs and thieves and murderers. Thinning out the assault rifle population among them will only help the rest of us.
Thinning out the assault rifle population among them will only help the rest of us.
How exactly does that work?
What makes you think laws apply to the lawless?
How exactly does that work?
You implied it in post #58,I'm sorry, where did I say that?
The black market clearly does not pay attention to gun laws.I said, the Black market is already violent, that's why it;s called a black market: it's full of thugs and thieves and murderers.
Thinning out the assault rifle population among them will only help the rest of us.
You implied it in post #58,
The black market clearly does not pay attention to gun laws.
So why would additional gun laws thin the assault rifle population among them?
Easy: when assault rifles and high capacity clips are banned from public sale, the supply of them begins to dry up and our chances of safer streets gets better and better as time goes on. As I said earlier, such weaponry does not grow out of the ground and the only reason enthusiasts want them is because they're cooool!!! So they have no real practical use in the public market.
A former FBI agent and a Navy veteran, estimates the number in the United States now "somewhere around 8 or 9 million."
They are just going to dry up huh?
Easy: when assault rifles and high capacity clips are banned from public sale, the supply of them begins to dry up and our chances of safer streets gets better and better as time goes on. As I said earlier, such weaponry does not grow out of the ground and the only reason enthusiasts want them is because they're cooool!!! So they have no real practical use in the public market.
If there is a market demand black or otherwise, it will be filled, and it may be worse.(chuckle)
I never implied anything of the kind. Please note: if they can't get their hands on assault weapons, they won't be able to use them will they.
Well, that's a sort of open ended question. I think that modern military style assault weapons, quick release magazine change buttons and all high capacity magazines/ clips should be restricted from the market until the country can get control of the threat they pose within the criminal element and the proliferation of such weaponry in the country is thinned to all but nonexistence. Very hard restrictions on imports of such weaponry should be put to use, wherein such weaponry is banned from importation during the period of time it takes. Extremely tough penalties should be placed on criminals who use such weaponry in the commission of their crimes: perhaps 10 years for a first offense. That alone should have some effect.
It comes down to this in my opinion, the anti-gun crowd will do anything, say anything, incorrectly classify anything, spin anything to get all guns banned. What they don’t understand that this is not a solution to violence. The key to that is in the moral compass of our society , the same compass they stomp on each day.