Geesh Another Bidenick. Wait until the next presidential election. You’re going see that wall go up, and just maybe some illegal immigrants go back to their countries of origin. It will be reunification alright.
Because believing otherwise would be stupid and ignorant.
That's a false claim. 438 miles of new wall was built.
It does not matter what you choose to believe.
Illegal Immigration Slows Under Trump as Migrants Say They'll Wait Out His Term in Mexico Before Trying Again
Almost a million migrants have entered the US via the southern border in the past 12 months. President Trump's controversial "Remain in Mexico" policy has slowed the rate of immigrants. Many now say they'll wait out Trump's term in office and try again when the U.S. has a new president.www1.cbn.com
Yawn.......
Yes there is. It's a matter of willingness. Other nations have effective border control. There is no reason we cannot as well.
Cherry-picked examples. And there is no proof that all of the unrest in cities is caused by the left. There are right wing infiltrators who go into peaceful protests and become instigators who cause violence just to make the protest look bad.
That happens to be fact. It's in the court records.
FindLaw - Real Customer Reviews
FindLaw is a free legal information website that helps consumers, small business owners, students, and legal professionals find legal documents and answers to everyday legal questions. FindLaw service...bestcompany.com
This is BS ^
I looked at the court records.
If our drug war made life unlivable back home for them then maybe it's our problem all the way around. And besides. We could use some willing workers. Have you seen the unemployment rate? Record low.
They never will which is why I am not republican
You mean like candidates supporting abortion for any or no reason right up to the point of birth? Now those are serious extremists.
Yes. The US is a horrible country. Guilty of doing so much harm worldwide. I wish all of the progressives would leave so things would improve.
No.
If all progressives left the USA, a large portion of jobs would suddenly not get done. The economy would go into a tailspin, and a recession would surely ensue, possibly descending into a depression. Marriages and families would be broken up, people in despair.
More revisionist history.
How does that contradict what I said? I was just being ironic about how a temporary WWII program lasted almost 20 years after V-J day. I also assume Cesar worked to get rid of the program. I worked with the union for a few years, in the fields, on the boycott and in its legal office. Even got to be one of Cesar’s bodyguards at times. His stated reason for opposing illegal immigration, which issue I worked on a bit, was because illegals were used as strike breakers. There was also one tragic issue when a legal worker was killed for resisting a false arrest by the immigration authorities, which at that time seemed pretty hostile to the union.
Some of the suggestions are for some national secure ID, but that is often opposed by both parties, even those conservatives who are concerned about illegals. I did simple checks for green cards when I was with the union, tho the skill of some forgers should not be underestimated. But I do believe higher wages would attract more citizens and legals. Then again, slave immigrants from Africa, then convicts bound for Georgia, then Europeans, then Chinese, Filipinos, and Japanese have been let in to do low wage work. In California in the 1930s we “imported” workers from Oklahoma and Arkansas. And as I have noted elsewhere, we still import Jamaicans as temps to work on cane.
Nope. They are too busy processing and babysitting the illegals that the democrat party is holding out the welcome sign for.
Complete and utter bullshit. If the cognitively declined turd now in the oval office had not stopped the construction of the wall and enforced the stay in Mexico policy the wall would have been completed and the border patrol would have been able to monitor the entire border. The wall comes with censors that give the border patrol time to head off any breach, over through or under.
If we just enforce our own borders, the problem of Central American drug traffic over our borders largely goes away. And the only thing that is unique is that the democrat party in this nation puts out the welcome sign. They see incoming illegals as potential future democrat voters. That's how they turned California blue.
How about this for creative? Enforce our damn immigration laws. Trump had it under control with much of the wall and the stay in Mexico policy while asylum claims are considered.
Yawn.......
Trump broke immigration law and precedent. Biden appears to be attempting to honor the Refugee Act and the relevant rarified treaties, while enforcing immigration laws that are somewhat in tension with those. But such complexity is lost on some who bought into Trump's Make America Hate Again campaigns. "Illegals that the democrat(ic) party is holding out the welcome sign for" is a good example of that simplistic interpretation of a complex problem.
100% baloney. And Joe Biden lacks the cognitive ability to understand the Refugee Act much less honor it. Evidently you do not understand it either. The individuals illegally sneaking across out borders are not refugees, They are illegal aliens.
I trust you have examined all the asylum claims of those at the border to have made your sweeping finding outlined in your last two sentences above. For my part, I worked professionally and opined on these issues, individual claims, detention conditions, and policies for 20 years under Reagan, Bush 1, Clinton, a bit of Bush 2, plus volunteering a bit under Trump. I addressed asylum officers, and submitted testimony to Congress. To roughly quote the Refugee Act, anyone within the United States, or at a land border or port of entry can apply for asylum, irrespective of their immigration status. See section 208 (a) at the link below. Reagan's administration was terribly biased on asylum cases, but not even he proposed what Trump did.
If you truly are all that involved, then you must know that 80% or more asylum cases are disapproved. And you must also understand that the statute is largely for those who apply for asylum at a point of entry. It's not intended for those who illegally sneak over the border. You must also be aware that the illegal aliens sneaking across the border are not seeking asylum. That is merely what the coyotes and indirectly the democrat party are telling them to do. The goal when they claim asylum is simply to get released into the country and given a court date for the asylum claim that they never intend to actually show up for. Ultimately the democrats push for comprehensive immigration bills to give them amnesty in exchange for control of the southern border. President Reagan fell for that and later listed it as one of his top regrets.
Of course I know that the majority of asylum cases are denied. What of it? I assume the majority of police brutality complaints arent valid. I investigated discrimination complaints for years. Lots of those were bogus. That’s why we have people investigating in those situations. And as I stated, the Refugee Act and similar legislation in other countries wisely recognized the irregular nature of refugee flight, how people may be lied to and exploited by smugglers, traffickers, etc. In San Francisco, notary public’s posing as legal professionals created a huge number of absurdly worded asylum claims for some real refugees, until the immigration service itself dealt with it. That’s why the “irrespective of status” language is in the Refugee Act. It is thus factually incorrect to state that the Act was designed for people who would present themselves at the border.
what you are still refusing to accept is that the illegal immigrants are not refugees They are not legal immigrants or residents. The Refugee Act does not apply to them.
It seems you are refusing to accept that one can be a refugee and an illegal immigrant at the same time. Someone runs away from oppression, then they cross the border illegally. Bingo! They are both. I dealt with hundreds of cases of people who crossed illegally and were granted asylum. If they walked into the immigration office, they could apply for asylum before an immigration official, an asylum officer after that group came to be. If they were captured by immigration, they could claim asylum as a defense against deportation.
Can you show us a picture of a Democrat welcome sign at the border, please? Or is this merely more right wing imagination.
There was never a plan to have a complete wall. Even under Trump when he had a Republican majority they wouldn't vote for it. Heck, they spent their first year failing to repeal Obamacare. That's because there is no way to fix health care without taking away big profits from powerful corporations, something Republicans could never do.
There is no 'just' about enforcing the borders. It is an immense job. We spend billions doing everything we can and the job is bigger than that.
Get a grip. It means that by their actions, they are pretty much inviting them.
Ever viewed the entire border? Ever heard of the Rio Grande? No wall needed there. The plan was for roughly 700 miles of border wall. Roughly 450 miles were completed before Dopey Joe stopped construction.
I would like to assume that you are smart enough to work out that getting things passed in congress is not as simple as having a majority.
However they did successfully repeal the individual mandate. Now nobody has to fear a 2% tax on their annual income if they refuse to buy overpriced health insurance.
Obamacare is enriching the profits of those power corporations.
Baloney.
Baloney.
Too much TDS is that rant to take you seriously.
See above.