Mr_DBater
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2007
- Messages
- 99
- Reaction score
- 4
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
In WWI in Europe it was a case of fighting clearly identified German planes, ships and soldiers in uniforms. Get to Berlin and Hitler. Take him out, in this case drive him to suicide and you have end of problem.
In the pacific it was a case of fighting clearly identified Japanese planes, ships and soldiers in uniform. Get to Tokyo or near enough with atom bombs and get Hirohito to surrender and end of problem.
In both cases we were dealing with mortal figureheads located at a geographical centre and we were fighting clearly identified soldiers in uniform. In the case of Al Queda we're dealing with an invisible enemy that worships an immortal figurehead, namely Allah with no geographical centre. It's like swatting flies in the dark when all along the main dung heap is in Pakistan anyway.
We're just putting our troops in harms way in Iraq and achieving nothing in the process, apart from getting thousands of our troops harmed.
Now with improved post 911 homeland security/intelligence in the USA It's extremely difficult for Al Queda to hit Americans on American soil. The only way for Al Queda to hit us is by going to Muslim turf. In doing so Bush and Blair played right into Bin Ladens' hands.
Returning to my original question... How can we possibly win against an ideology with an immortal figurehead and no geograpical centre and that's virtually invisible becuase it's warriors don't even wear uniforms ?
My view is it's an utterly hopeless cause. Iraq has been a waste of thousands of lives and hundreds of $billions.
The only hope is better homeland security and learning to live with the fact that a sizeable proportion of the rest of the world is always going to be living under Muslim theocracy. Nothing has been achieved in Iraq apart from intalling a toothless psuedo democracy and starting a bloodbath between two warring tribal factions.
In the pacific it was a case of fighting clearly identified Japanese planes, ships and soldiers in uniform. Get to Tokyo or near enough with atom bombs and get Hirohito to surrender and end of problem.
In both cases we were dealing with mortal figureheads located at a geographical centre and we were fighting clearly identified soldiers in uniform. In the case of Al Queda we're dealing with an invisible enemy that worships an immortal figurehead, namely Allah with no geographical centre. It's like swatting flies in the dark when all along the main dung heap is in Pakistan anyway.
We're just putting our troops in harms way in Iraq and achieving nothing in the process, apart from getting thousands of our troops harmed.
Now with improved post 911 homeland security/intelligence in the USA It's extremely difficult for Al Queda to hit Americans on American soil. The only way for Al Queda to hit us is by going to Muslim turf. In doing so Bush and Blair played right into Bin Ladens' hands.
Returning to my original question... How can we possibly win against an ideology with an immortal figurehead and no geograpical centre and that's virtually invisible becuase it's warriors don't even wear uniforms ?
My view is it's an utterly hopeless cause. Iraq has been a waste of thousands of lives and hundreds of $billions.
The only hope is better homeland security and learning to live with the fact that a sizeable proportion of the rest of the world is always going to be living under Muslim theocracy. Nothing has been achieved in Iraq apart from intalling a toothless psuedo democracy and starting a bloodbath between two warring tribal factions.
Last edited: