How can racist put a end to abortion,illegal immigration and welfare? (1 Viewer)

[jamesrage]

How can racist put a end to abortion,illegal immigration and welfare?The answer is simple,gulity by association.

1.Side with abortionist and make it a racist issue.This will distance the pro-abortionist and alienate them and their issues.Be sure and show up to these pro-aboriton rallies in your white sheets or nazi uniforms or what ever it is that racist wear these days to their meetings.If the proabortionist get violent the police will lock them up and they will be silenced and seen as the vermin they are.If they don't get voilent they will sit there and ignor you. Either way they are tossed in jail or they are seen as associating with racist.As a result questons will be asked and these people will be looked down upon thus paving the way for anti-abortion legislation.

2.Side with the pro-welfare crowd and make up some racist reason for supporting.This will alienate any one who thinks of giving money away to those who are fully capable of working for it.Be sure and show up to these pro-welfare rallies in your white sheets or nazi uniforms or what ever it is that racist wear these days to their meetings.If the pro-welfare crowd gets violent the police will lock them up and they will be silenced.If don't get violent they will sit there and ignor you. Either way they are tossed in jail or they are seen as associating with racist.As a result questons will be asked and these people will be looked down upon thus paving the way for anti-abortion legislation.

3.Side with the pro-illegals crowd and make up racist reason for it.This will help alienate those who favor letting vermin spit on out laws.Be sure and show up to these pro-illegals rallies in your white sheets or nazi uniforms or what ever it is that racist wear these days to their meetings.If the pro-illegals crowd get violent the police will lock them.If they don't get violent hey will sit there and ignor you and either way they are tossed in jail or they are seen as associating with racist.As a result questons will be asked and these people will be looked down upon thus paving the way for anti-abortion legislation.


Lets face it no one likes racist except for other racist.So if you racist started siding with the abortionist,pro-illegals, and pro-welfare, you could kill their movement.

 

[Volker]

So you think, fake rascists are necessary to make this happen with pro-abortion, pro-welfare and pro-immigrant rallies. That's a lot of effort and if it comes to light - like most things - there is the laughter in the end.

But look at the other side. For anti-abortion, anti-welfare and anti-immigrant ideas the original rascists will probably volunteer. Not much effort and no laughter in the end.

Looks like, real life sides with the progressives here.

 

[FallingPianos]

problem is that people associate racists with conservatives so strongly that they would jsut assume you were there to cause trouble, not to support their cause. you'd just be hurting your case.

its also a desperate cheap shot.

 

[jamesrage]

So you think, fake rascists are necessary to make this happen with pro-abortion, pro-welfare and pro-immigrant rallies.

IF these racist associated themselve with liberal issues, people would associate those liberals issues with racism.

 

[jamesrage]

problem is that people associate racists with conservatives so strongly that they would jsut assume you were there to cause trouble, not to support their cause. you'd just be hurting your case.

I think if racism was suddenly pegged to certian liberal issues they would be hurting liberalism.

its also a desperate cheap shot.

Politics is all about taking cheap shots.

 

[Volker]

IF these racist associated themselve with liberal issues, people would associate those liberals issues with racism.

Yes, I think so. A good thing would be, if people, who organize these rallies can take actions to make sure, who is marching with them and who is not. Actually, rioters hurt demonstrations a lot in public opinion, racists would do the same, I guess.

 

[jamesrage]

Actually, rioters hurt demonstrations a lot in public opinion, racists would do the same, I guess.

That is the idea.Either the libs will riot and hurt thier cause or they will stand there peacefully and it will hurt thier cause or they will leave the rally and it is will hurt their casue and if they get a court order to bar fellow protesters it will hurt their cause.So they are damned if they do and damned if they don't.

 

[Volker]

So they are damned if they do and damned if they don't.

There are ways to manage it. When they had these stupid social reforms in Germany like 2 years ago, the Socialists went out demonstrating and the Nationalists wanted to be with them in their special look, you know this black-white-red. The Socialists found ways to not let them join demonstrations.

 

[jamesrage]

There are ways to manage it. When they had these stupid social reforms in Germany like 2 years ago, the Socialists went out demonstrating and the Nationalists wanted to be with them in their special look, you know this black-white-red. The Socialists found ways to not let them join demonstrations.

Why do the racist have to demonstrate with the liberals they protest by themselves on every capital?

 

[FallingPianos]

I think if racism was suddenly pegged to certian liberal issues they would be hurting liberalism.

sure. but it would take an entire political movement to convince anyone that these racists were for real, and not there just to stir up trouble. liberals would be quick to distance themselves from such a movement. it might be called "neo liberalism" or something like that so as to seperate it from mainstream liberalism.

Politics is all about taking cheap shots.

yes, and its a shameful situation. anyone who is advocating it is part of the problem.

 

[jamesrage]

sure. but it would take an entire political movement to convince anyone that these racists were for real, and not there just to stir up trouble.

I think they can come up with genuine racist like reasons for wanting abortion, welfare and illegals.With abortion minorieties are more than likely to get and abortion that white,the majority of planned parenthood clinics are in black nieghborhoods,Margarett Sanger the founder of planned parenthood is a racist and eugenist and wanted to use birthcontrol advance the eugenics movement,They could use those facts and then use some racist like reasons for supporting abortion.Statistically if minorieties are the majority of welfare recipients that mean the very successful and middle class are the minority in the minoriety community.Illegals make slave wages for doing certian jobs.I think it would be really easy for racist to convince the public they actually support these things for racist reasons.

yes, and its a shameful situation. anyone who is advocating it is part of the problem.

Have you ever heard of the old saying that there is no such thing as a fair fight?

 

[FallingPianos]

I think they can come up with genuine racist like reasons for wanting abortion, welfare and illegals.With abortion minorieties are more than likely to get and abortion that white,the majority of planned parenthood clinics are in black nieghborhoods,Margarett Sanger the founder of planned parenthood is a racist and eugenist and wanted to use birthcontrol advance the eugenics movement,They could use those facts and then use some racist like reasons for supporting abortion.Statistically if minorieties are the majority of welfare recipients that mean the very successful and middle class are the minority in the minoriety community.Illegals make slave wages for doing certian jobs.I think it would be really easy for racist to convince the public they actually support these things for racist reasons.

liberals would be too quick to distance themselves even if a significant movement started. the reasoning might be there, but the power is not.

Have you ever heard of the old saying that there is no such thing as a fair fight?

even if there were no such thing, thats no reason to abandon the goal of creating one, or to advocate using unfair tactics.

 

[jamesrage]

liberals would be too quick to distance themselves even if a significant movement started. the reasoning might be there, but the power is not.

There is no real way of knowing what will happen until it is actually done

even if there were no such thing, thats no reason to abandon the goal of creating one, or to advocate using unfair tactics.

The way I look at is one good turn deserves another.For years liberals have labled conservatives as racist when in reality if you look at what the statics are,those things liberals support do seem racist,minorieties are more likely than white people to have abortions,be on welfare and work low wage jobs and all these things are mostly supported by white liberals.I think it does explain why liberals have pegged the conservatives as racist.The way I look at is politics is a dirty game and you got to play dirty to win..

 

[LogicalReason]

problem is that people associate racists with conservatives so strongly that they would jsut assume you were there to cause trouble, not to support their cause. you'd just be hurting your case.

its also a desperate cheap shot.

wait people associate racists with conservatives. :spin: :spin: :spin:


lolz im going to need some credible sources for that one.

 

[disneydude]

IF these racist associated themselve with liberal issues, people would associate those liberals issues with racism.

People aren't that stupid. And why do you want to distant yourself from them since they are so closely affiliated with issues that are close to you. Does it make you feel uncomfortable?

 

[disneydude]

I think they can come up with genuine racist like reasons for wanting abortion, welfare and illegals.With abortion minorieties are more than likely to get and abortion that white,the majority of planned parenthood clinics are in black nieghborhoods,Margarett Sanger the founder of planned parenthood is a racist and eugenist and wanted to use birthcontrol advance the eugenics movement,They could use those facts and then use some racist like reasons for supporting abortion.Statistically if minorieties are the majority of welfare recipients that mean the very successful and middle class are the minority in the minoriety community.Illegals make slave wages for doing certian jobs.I think it would be really easy for racist to convince the public they actually support these things for racist reasons.





Have you ever heard of the old saying that there is no such thing as a fair fight?

^
An act of desperation if I've ever seen one!

 

[jamesrage]

People aren't that stupid.

There are ****ing retarded morons who have bought the lie that minutemen are racist inbred rednecks no better than the KKK,I am sure they will buy the lie of abortionist,pro-illegals, and pro-welfare people as being racist when people ion white hoods and people with ****ed up little mustaches start parading around these issues as thier own.

And why do you want to distant yourself from them since they are so closely affiliated with issues that are close to you.

I don't give a ****,I am not concerned about what retards think of me.

Does it make you feel uncomfortable?

No it doesn't.I just think the faster route to abolishing abortion,curbing welfare abuses and booting out illegals would be to paint the pro-illegals,abortionist, and pro-welfare as racist.

 

[Volker]

Why do the racist have to demonstrate with the liberals they protest by themselves on every capital?

This was just an example about it's possible to handle these situations. Socialists are not liberals, at least not in Germany. What we call liberals, is almost the opposite of socialists, but I think these labels are used differently. Probably you call libertarian, what we call liberals.

 

[FallingPianos]

wait people associate racists with conservatives. :spin: :spin: :spin:


lolz im going to need some credible sources for that one.

the KKK for instance. very well known conservative racist group. comes to most peoples minds very quickly when discussing racism in the US.

 

[LogicalReason]

the KKK for instance. very well known conservative racist group. comes to most peoples minds very quickly when discussing racism in the US.

uhuh

http://hnn.us/roundup/entries/3554.html
Most people are either a Democrat by design, or a Democrat by deception. That is either they were well aware the racist history of the Democrat Party and still chose to be Democrat, or they were deceived into thinking that the Democratic Party is a party that sincerely cared about Black people.

History reveals that every piece of racist legislation that was ever passed and every racist terrorist attack that was ever inflicted on African Americans, was initiated by the members of the Democratic Party. From the formation of the Democratic Party in 1792 to the Civil Rights movement of 1960's, Congressional records show the Democrat Party passed no specific laws to help Blacks, every law that they introduced into Congress was designed to hurt blacks in 1894 Repeal Act. The chronicles of history shows that during the past 160 years the Democratic Party legislated Jim Crows laws, Black Codes and a multitude of other laws at the state and federal level to deny African Americans their rights as citizens.

History reveals that the Republican Party was formed in 1854 to abolish slavery and challenge other racist legislative acts initiated by the Democratic Party.

Some called it the Civil War, others called it the War Between the States, but to the African Americans at that time, it was the War Between the Democrats and the Republicans over slavery. The Democrats gave their lives to expand it, Republican gave their lives to ban it.

During the Senate debates on the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, it was revealed that members of the Democratic Party formed many terrorist organizations like the Ku Klux Klan to murder and intimidate African Americans voters. The Ku Klux Klan Act was a bill introduced by a Republican Congress to stop Klan Activities. Senate debates revealed that the Klan was the terrorist arm of the Democratic Party.

History reveals that Democrats lynched, burned, mutilated and murdered thousands of blacks and completely destroyed entire towns and communities occupied by middle class Blacks, including Rosewood, Florida, the Greenwood District in Tulsa Oklahoma, and Wilmington, North Carolina to name a few.

After the Civil War, Democrats murdered several hundred black elected officials (in the South) to regain control of the southern government. All of the elected officials up to 1935 were Republicans. As of 2004, the Democrat Party (the oldest political party in America) has never elected a black man to the United States Senate, the Republicans have elected three.

History reveals that it was Thaddeus Stevens, a Radical Republican that introduced legislation to give African Americans the so-called 40 acres and a mule and Democrats overwhelmingly voted against the bill. Today many white Democrats are opposed to paying African Americans trillions of dollars in Reparation Pay, money that should be paid by the Democratic Party.

History reveals that it was Abolitionists and Radical Republicans such as Henry L. Morehouse and General Oliver Howard that started many of the traditional Black colleges, while Democrats fought to keep them closed. Many of our traditional Black colleges are named after white Republicans.

Congressional records show it was Democrats that strongly opposed the passage of the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments. These three Amendments were introduced by Republicans to abolish slavery, give citizenship to all African Americans born in the United States and, give Blacks the right to vote.

Congressional records show that Democrats were opposed to passing the following laws that were introduced by Republicans to achieve civil rights for African Americans:

Civil Rights Act 1866
Reconstruction Act of 1867
Freedman Bureau Extension Act of 1866
Enforcement Act of 1870
Force Act of 1871
Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871
Civil Rights Act of 1875
Civil Rights Act of 1957
Civil Rights Act of 1960

And during the 60's many Democrats fought hard to defeat the

1964 Civil Rights Act
1965 Voting Rights Acts
1972 Equal Employment Opportunity Act

Court records shows that it was the Democrats that supported the Dred Scott Decision. The decision classified Blacks and property rather than people. It was also the racist Jim Crow practices initiated by Democrats that brought about the two landmark cases of Plessy v Ferguson and Brown v. The Board of Education.

At the turn of the century (1900), Southern Democrats continued to oppress African Americans by placing thousands in hard-core prison labor camps. According to most historians, the prison camps were far worst than slavery. The prisoners were required to work from 10-14 hours a day, six to seven days a week in temperatures that exceeded 100 degrees and in temperatures that fell well below zero. The camps provided free labor for building railroads, mining coal-mines and for draining snake and alligator invested swamps and rivers. Blacks were transported from one project to another in rolling cages similar to the ones used to transfer circus animals. One fourth of the prison populations were children ages 6 to 18. Young Cy Williams age 12, was sentenced to 20 years for stealing a horse that he was too small to ride. Eight-year old Will Evans was sentenced to 2 years of hard labor for taking some change from a store counter and six-year old Mary Gay was sentenced to 30 days for taking a hat. While authorities sent whites to jail for the same offenses, they sent blacks to the prison camps with much longer sentences. Thousands died from malaria, frost bites, heat strokes, shackle poisoning, others were buried alive in collapsing mines, or blown to pieces in tunnel explosions, and still others drowned in swamps or were beaten and shot to death. Every southern black citizen was a potential prisoner for any alleged small offense, including violating evening curfews. Through the prison camp system, southern owners of railroads, mines and farms had an unlimited source of free labor. The black prisoners played a major role the South's economic development. Bryan Stevenson of the Equal Justice Initiative, said, in his opinion, "the prison camps were a new form of slavery, but far more inhumane."

History reveals that it was three white persons that opposed the Democrat's racist practices who started the NAACP.

Dr. Martin Luther King, several Civil Rights leaders and many historians reported that during the first two years of his administration, President John F. Kennedy ignored Dr. King's request for Civil Rights. The chronicles of history reveal that it was only after television coverage of riots and several demonstrations did President Kennedy feel a need to introduce the 1963 Civil Rights Act. At that time, experts believe the nation was headed toward a major race war.

History reveals that it was Democratic Attorney General, Robert Kennedy that approved the secret wire taps on Dr, Martin Luther King Jr., and it was Democratic President Lyndon Johnson that referred to Dr. King as " that ****** preacher." Senator Byrd referred to Dr. King as a "trouble maker" who causes trouble and then runs like a "coward," when trouble breaks out.

Over the strong objections of racist Senator Jessie Helms, Republican President Ronald Reagan, signed into law, a bill to make Dr. Martin Luther King's birthday a national holiday. Several Republican Senators convinced President Reagan this was the right thing to do.

Congressional records show after signing the 1972 Equal Employment Opportunity Act and issuing Executive Order 11478, Richard Nixon, a Republican, that started what we know as Affirmative Action.

On December 15, 1994, federal Judge David V. Kenyon issued a court order to the Clinton Administration in the Case of Fairchild v Robert Reich Secretary of Labor (#CV92-5765 Kn). The order demanded that Secretary Reich and the Clinton Administration force 100 west coast shipping to develop an Affirmative Action plan to stop discrimination against, African Americans, Hispanics, Female and Disabled Workers. Female employees were being sexually harrassed, Hispanic were being denied promotions and training, Disable Workers were being laid off, and African Americans were being force to work in an environment where they had job classification called " ****** Jobs." Clinton left office six years later and never complied with the court order. The companies still do not have an Affirmative Action Plan.

President Clinton sent 20, 000 troops to protect the white citizens of Europe's Bosnia, but sent no troops to Africa's Rwanda to protect the black citizens there. Consequently over 800,000 Africans were massacre

During the 2003 Democratic Primary debates, the Rev. Al Sharpton, said the Democrat take the black vote for granted and treat African American like a mistress. They [Democrats} will take us to the dance, but they don't want to take us home to meet mama."


On December 3, 2002, President Clinton spoke to Democratic Leadership Council in New York regarding the future of the Democratic Party and how they could retake the White House. At no time did he address Civil Rights issues for blacks or doing things to improve the conditions of African Americans. His only reference to Civil Rights was Civil Rights for Gays. His only reference to improving communities was his recommendation to revisit the Marshall Plan to re-build communities in other countries. His entire speech was aired on C-Span.

To be continued because of length.

 

[LogicalReason]

http://hnn.us/roundup/entries/3554.html
After exclusively giving the Democrats their votes for the past 25 years, the average African American cannot point to one piece of civil rights legislation sponsored solely by the Democratic Party that was specifically designed to eradicate the unique problems that African Americans face today. [/B]Congressional records show that all previous legislation (since 1964) had strong bi-partisan support, even though some Democrats debated and voted against these laws.

After reviewing all of the evidence, many believe America would have never experienced racism to the degree that it has, had not the Democrats promoted it through:

Racist Legislation
Terrorist Organizations
Negative Media Communications
Bias Education
Relentless Intimidation

The racism established and promoted by members of the Democratic Party affected and infected the entire nation from 1856 with the Dred Scott decision, to the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education case. But they never offered or issued an apology.

Today both parties must remember their past. The Democrats must remember the terrible things they did to Blacks and apologize and the Republicans must remember the terrific things they did for Blacks and re-commit to complete the work that their predecessors started and died for.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_klux_klan
Although often still discussed in contemporary American politics as representing the quintessential "fringe" end of the far-right spectrum, today the group only exists in the form of a number of very isolated, scattered "supporters" that probably do not number more than a few thousand. In a 2002 report on "Extremism in America", the Anti-Defamation League wrote "Today, there is no such thing as the Ku Klux Klan.

Today the only known former member of the Klan to hold a Federal office in the United States is Senator Robert Byrd

So the only member of the KKK to hold public office today is a liberal? nice

More liberal racism

http://www.blackconservative.net/RL.html
Here is a compilation of racist statements made by
prominent liberals:

~During a speech, Democrat Lieutenant Governor,
Cruz Bustamante, used the N–Word.

~Senator Ernest Hollings (D-S.C.) told reporters on
December 14, 1993, that he attended international
summits alongside “these potentates from down in
Africa.” He continued, saying, “rather than eating each
other, they’d just come up and get a good square meal
in Geneva.” Senator Hollings also held out for keeping
the confederate flag flying over the state capitol. In
1960 Hollings “warned today that South Carolina would
not permit ‘explosive’ manifestations in connection with
Negro demands for lunch-counter services.”

~New York City Councilman Charles Barron told a
crowd at the Millions for Reparations March in
Washington D.C. that he wished his goal of seeing
blacks compensated for the enslavement of their
ancestors was closer to fruition. He said, “I want to go
up to the closest white person and say:’You can’t
understand this, it’s a black thing’ and then slap him, just
for my mental health.”

~Jesse Jackson, who misses few opportunities to expose
racism in others, referred to New York City as
“hymietown.”

~Jackson’s buddy, Al Sharpton, was a central figure in
fanning the 1991 Crown Heights race riot, where a mob
killed an innocent Jewish man. In addition to that,
Sharpton also initiated a 1995 protest of a Jewish owned
store in Harlem where protesters used several anti-
Semitic slurs.

~Bill Clinton was among three state officials in Arkansas,
in 1989, who were sued under the federal Voting Rights
Act of 1965. “Plaintiffs offered plenty of proof of
monolithic voting along racial lines, intimidation of black
voters and candidates, and other official acts that made
voting harder for blacks,” according to the Arkansas
Gazette, “The evidence at the trial was indeed
overwhelming that the Voting Rights Act had been
violated.”

During Clinton’s 12-year tenure as Governor, he never
approved a state civil rights law.

Bill Clinton admired Oral Eugene Faubus, whose claim to
fame was trying to bar nine black children from
attending Little Rock’s Central High School in 1957.
Clinton was also a friend of William Fulbright, a
segregationist who signed the Southern Manifesto,
which denounced the Supreme Court’s Brown vs. Board
of Education decision. Clinton referred to Fulbright as
“my mentor, a visionary, a humanitarian.”

~Democratic National Chairman, Terry McAuliffe used
the term “colored people” in a speech soon after
becoming DNC chief. And I thought liberals were
progressive.

~San Francisco Democrat, Mayor Willie Brown, after
winning the 1995 election said, “The white boys got
taken fair and square.”

~Apparently Spike Lee has a problem with interracial
couples as he has stated that, “I give interracial couples
a look. Daggers. They get uncomfortable when they
see me on the street.”

~Dan Rather, having avoided covering a story on
Condaleeza Rice, eventually did the story, saying that
CBS “got the Buckwheats,” suggesting that CBS was
afraid not to cover the story because the other networks
were covering it.

~Andrew Cuomo found himself in an uncomfortable
position when he said that voting for his rival for the New
York Democratic gubernatorial nomination, Carl McCall,
who is black, would make for a “racial contract”
between black and Hispanic Democrats “and that can’t
happen.” Cuomo eventually dropped out of the race
for governor.

~Former Democratic Minority Leader in the U.S. House
of Representatives, Dick Gephardt, gave several
speeches to a now defunct white supremacist
organization called the Metro South Citizens Council.
Gephardt also asked the group for an endorsement of
his candidacy.

~Regarding Clarence Thomas and Affirmative Action,
Maureen Dowd insults Thomas’ accomplishments by
writing, “It makes him crazy that people think he is where
he is because of his race, but he is where he is because
of his race.” Is Dowd saying that without Affirmative
Action, blacks are incapable of accomplishing anything
great or is she saying that all whites are racist and
therefore would never have given Thomas a chance?

It may be one thing for a conservative to point all of
these things out, but there are some black Democrats
who have accused their own party of racism. Says
Baltimore Democrat, Tony E. Fulton, “They really don’t
care about us. We are used every four years, then
thrown back.” Black conservatives have been pointing
that out for years.

Dereck E. Davis, of Prince George, Maryland, is
chairman of the Economic Matters Committee.
According to Davis, “The state party is racist to the
core.” And Nathaniel T. Oaks, a Baltimore Democratic
Delegate, remarked, “I think the Democratic Party takes
black people for granted.”

The above are all fairly recent incidents, but racism in
the Democratic Party stems back to prior to the Civil
War. The Republican party was created in response to
a growing number of Americans who were against
slavery. Thomas Jefferson, and others with the same
philosophy, that slavery was a “positive good,” founded
the Democratic Party.

Following the war, Democrats continued to fight against
equal rights for blacks, eventually defeating
Reconstruction and implementing Jim Crow. During the
1920s, Republicans repeatedly called for anti-lynching
legislature that was opposed by Democrats.

Franklin Delano Roosevelt did his part to continue the
trend of Democratic racism. In addition to the
Japanese Internment situation, Roosevelt is also
responsible for appointing two notorious segregationists
to the U.S. Supreme Court - Jimmy Byrnes and Hugo
Black.

Hugo Black, a former Democrat Senator from Alabama
had a long history of hate group activism. He was a
member of the Ku Klux Klan and became famous for
defending Klansmen under prosecution for racial
murders.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 got more support from
Republicans than from Democrats. Republican Senate
Minority Leader, Everett Dirksen, pushed the bill through
the Senate despite 21 no-votes from Democrats,
including Al Gore’s father and, of course, Robert Byrd.
Only 4 Republicans opposed the bill.

Democratic opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 split
the party in two. Forty percent of the House Democrats
voted against the Civil Rights Act. At the same time,
80% of Republicans supported it. Republican support in
the Senate was even higher.

So, the next time a liberal brags about their record on
race issues, you know what to say.

Also in your spare time you can check out some of these. If you want I can get you dozens more..

http://washingtontimes.com/metro/20051101-104932-4054r.htm
http://www.americandaily.com/article/5885
http://members.tripod.com/~GOPcapitalist/democratrecord.html
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=3478
http://www.michellemalkin.com/archives/003823.htm
http://hnn.us/roundup/entries/3554.html
http://www.federalistjournal.com/fedblog/?p=2588
http://www.michnews.com/artman/publish/article_10195.shtml
http://www.ashbrook.org/publicat/oped/owens/02/racism.html
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05009/438844.stm
http://www.opinioneditorials.com/freedomwriters/ratlief_20030819.html
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Commentary/com-11_9_05_RNJ.html
http://www.ashbrook.org/publicat/oped/alt/03/racism.html
http://home.bellsouth.net/p/s/community.dll?ep=87&subpageid=181679&ck=

 

[jamesrage]

So the only member of the KKK to hold public office today is a liberal? nice

More liberal racism

Also in your spare time you can check out some of these. If you want I can get you dozens more..

http://washingtontimes.com/metro/20051101-104932-4054r.htm
http://www.americandaily.com/article/5885
http://members.tripod.com/~GOPcapitalist/democratrecord.html
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=3478
http://www.michellemalkin.com/archives/003823.htm
http://hnn.us/roundup/entries/3554.html
http://www.federalistjournal.com/fedblog/?p=2588
http://www.michnews.com/artman/publish/article_10195.shtml
http://www.ashbrook.org/publicat/oped/owens/02/racism.html
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05009/438844.stm
http://www.opinioneditorials.com/freedomwriters/ratlief_20030819.html
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Commentary/com-11_9_05_RNJ.html
http://www.ashbrook.org/publicat/oped/alt/03/racism.html
http://home.bellsouth.net/p/s/community.dll?ep=87&subpageid=181679&ck=

The thing about these stories is that it is easy for the public to ignor since the meida is liberally biased,however kkk and nazi verin and others marching for abortion,illegal immigration, and welfare is something that would demand the publics attention.

 

[LogicalReason]

The thing about these stories is that it is easy for the public to ignor since the meida is liberally biased,however kkk and nazi verin and others marching for abortion,illegal immigration, and welfare is something that would demand the publics attention.

I was just providing some evidence against his evidenceless attacks on conservatism being filled with racism.

Now I'm sure that some kkks, nazis, and others do march for abortion, illegal immigration, and welfare but there are not that many kkks, nazis, and other such people around today and they wouldn't really end any of those things. The liberal media would just hush hush it all and expect it to blow over. Plus it would seem a little cheap even if you could find and convince racist pigs to take time from their racist activities to do such. Its much better to beat something by showing the public the kinds of people that already support it. Such as the racist pigs who are members of the leading liberal party. Or by pointing a finger at something like who supports illegal immigration... a lot of those who do are illegal immigrants.

 

[Jay R]

What this post was advocating is what is technically termed 'black propaganda' where you produce materials or commit actions in the name of or attributed to another group/individual/policy that you wish to discredit, thus manipulating the broader perception of that group/individual/policy.

Why would a racist be anti-abortion? I'm pretty sure if you look up the figures that it isn't middle-class white girls in suburban America making up the numbers, the majority of abortions are, to the best of my knowledge, of black, latino or mixed race babies. Surely a racist would be happy with that?

Can anyone provide a link to figures with a breakdown by racial groups?

 

[jamesrage]

What this post was advocating is what is technically termed 'black propaganda' where you produce materials or commit actions in the name of or attributed to another group/individual/policy that you wish to discredit, thus manipulating the broader perception of that group/individual/policy.

Why would a racist be anti-abortion? I'm pretty sure if you look up the figures that it isn't middle-class white girls in suburban America making up the numbers, the majority of abortions are, to the best of my knowledge, of black, latino or mixed race babies. Surely a racist would be happy with that?

Can anyone provide a link to figures with a breakdown by racial groups?

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5212a1.htm


In the 41 areas for which race was adequately reported, approximately 55% of women who obtained legal induced abortions were known to be white, 35% were black, and 7% were of other races; for 3% of the women, race was unknown. (Table 9). The abortion ratio for black women (503 per 1,000 live births) was 3.0 times the ratio for white women (167 per 1,000 live births). Additionally, the abortion ratio for women of other races (329 per 1,000 live births) was 2.0 times the ratio for white women. The abortion rate for black women (30 per 1,000 women) was 3.1 times the rate for white women (10 per 1,000 women), whereas the abortion rate for women of other races (22 per 1,000 women) was 2.2 times the rate for white women.