Devil505
Banned
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2009
- Messages
- 3,512
- Reaction score
- 315
- Location
- Masschusetts
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Like you had a choice.
:doh
In fairness the definition is given as:
So Oral sex, is still sexual intercourse. I mean, they don't call it oral SEX for nothing
OMG are we still talking about Clinton ?
The only way Clinton failed me in that whole deal was not telling Ken Starr to fekk off.
Can't subpeona a sitting president, gotta impeach first.
They didn't have the votes.
Clinton should have told Ken Starr off as the small fry he was, and since he didn't, Clinton weakened the power of the office.
Kinda hard to tell off a special prosecutor after he's been appointed.
Never said it did. I brought up the republican-sponsored animal-human hybridization bill because I consider it to be a colossal waste of time and money (i.e., the concept originally posited by rudedog, which we are now discussing).
If you believe it's NOT a waste of time and money, please do elaborate. We're all ears.
Umm? Where did I say or imply that this animal health corridor designation will "out of hand fail financially?"
I recommend you reread my statement:
Then think about it a bit more, before wandering even further into Ignorant Debater Land.
Gloating is bad form & something I didn't do when you apologized to me on an earlier point.
Additionally I would point out that if Next Extra hadn't saved your butt......You would have lost this debate so.......I should really have conceded to Next Extra!:lol:
But the question is in this definition is if the receiver is covered as the one having oral intercourse or instead the giver. I don't know too many people who count getting blowjobs as having sex. Hell you can't fault clinton for thinking like a female :mrgreen: but even so this wasn't the definition agreed upon by both the prosecution and the defense.
House passes resolution criticizing Wilson - CNN.com
House passes resolution criticizing Wilson
The House of Representatives on Tuesday formally admonished Republican Rep. Joe Wilson for shouting "you lie" during President Obama's speech to a joint session of Congress last week.
I do not think that this was needed but I understand why they formally admonished this sorry excuse for a Congressman. If he really did apologize as a gentleman instead of bragging that he was forced into an apology I do not think that the House would have taken this action.
Do you guys hink that this piece Congressional trash was worth the time to formally admonish ?
I don't know too many people who count getting blowjobs as having sex.
so you (as usual) are lying. :doh
You try and gloat all the time even though you are wrong, again most of the time. :roll:
The first (BA-1) was in November of 1973. They were running 3 classes of 53 students every 10 weeks. So to be in (BA-4) according to your statement is possible and does sound credible.
They were indeed also "special agents."
Anyone can get this information here...
DEA History Book, 1970 - 1975
I don't think he would have made this up, and it jives with the web site 100%.
Don't feel bad, so do I, for the not being an LEO anyway.
I officially apologies to Devil for doubting his being an LEO.
Are people in the world trying to do this? Are researchers trying to do this?
We have created human-animal embryos already, say British team - Times Online
Vault9 Forums > Scientists Mix Human And Animal Dna
Technology Review: Human-Animal Cybrids
We can already inject DNA into the nucleus of a cow egg and zap it with electricity, thus reprogramming that egg to be human. And we can even get that egg to start dividing as if it were an embryo, creating a bunch of human stem cells. Beyond that, we just aren’t sure. Will these embryos create viable stem cells to treat all those nasty human diseases? Or will they just be duds that act too much like cow cells to be usable by humans? If there’s even a small chance that the former will come to pass, it’s worth investigating – and we’ll have solved the human stem cell shortage problem. --Animal-human hybrid clones
Does not look like so much of a waist anymore does it?
So you did not respond correctly to my initial reply I see.
So you either completely missed my point or are being willfully ignorant.
You know, I remember when they changed the name of Candlestick Park in 1995. The park didn't change. The location didn't change. The crappy weather didn't change. And nobody called it 3Com Park. Or San Francisco Stadium at Candlestick Point. Or Monster Park. The Giants never stopped calling the stadium Candlestick Park in their media guides. It was and always will be Candlestick Park, no matter how many names they give it. The city/county even had to change the freeway signs back to read "Candlestick Park" because those other lame names just got people hopelessly lost. The bottom line is, the fancy new names changed nothing and did nothing to improve tourism. Essentially, the whole name change thing was a flop.
Intercourse is between two (or in some cases multiple) people. You can't say the guy had sex but the woman didn't sorry, but it doesn't work that way.
There is a reason it is called oral SEX, it is STILL SEX.
Yes, they are, and I consider that a GREAT thing. I don't want restrictions placed on stem cell research when it has the possibility to save millions of lives. From your responses, we can assume that you are adamantly against medical and scientific advances. Big shock, that.
Here's the thing...
See? We can eliminate the need for human embryos in stem cell research. Banning such research means we'll continue using human embryos. Don't you want to save the children?!?!? :doh
Actually, this looks like a waist.
Ah. You didn't like my response, so it's "incorrect." Was I required to "respond correctly?" And who gets to decide what a "correct" response is? YOU? :doh
Oh, I got your point. I responded the way I did because your point is stupid.
You see, slapping a New and Improved! name on an existing thing/place/geographical area doesn't really change anything about that existing thing/place/geographical area. Whatever animal health businesses in that area today were also there last week - before the "Animal Corridor" designation was plastered over them - doing business as they've always done. Whatever presumed "tourism" that might occur because the region has a fancy new title (pasted on top of NO CHANGES/IMPROVEMENTS WHATSOEVER) will surely not make or break these businesses.
Be serious, dude. How many people who never had any interest in going to Kansas City are suddenly going to make vacation plans because the Kansas City Animal Health Corridor title is SO incredibly intriguing? :roll:
You know, I remember when they changed the name of Candlestick Park in 1995. The park didn't change. The location didn't change. The crappy weather didn't change. And nobody called it 3Com Park. Or San Francisco Stadium at Candlestick Point. Or Monster Park. The Giants never stopped calling the stadium Candlestick Park in their media guides. It was and always will be Candlestick Park, no matter how many names they give it. The city/county even had to change the freeway signs back to read "Candlestick Park" because those other lame names just got people hopelessly lost. The bottom line is, the fancy new names changed nothing and did nothing to improve tourism. Essentially, the whole name change thing was a flop.
I'm sorry, but I believe spending congressional time discussing nifty new business-related monikers (that will never be used except by total dinks) for geographical regions is a complete waste of my tax dollars. Obviously, you think such things are just great.
God help us.
Because you don't like it is not a good enough reason to call it a waste of tax payer money.
My argument is based on tangible economics, it can be proven.
You have no concept of marketing do you?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?