- Joined
- Nov 5, 2020
- Messages
- 1,381
- Reaction score
- 411
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
I have a friend who has been denied insurance medical transportation by -- as far as I can figure -- the hospital and not the insurance. He stays at home and is primarily a hermit in the sense that he doesn't have many friends besides me, and I have no license and am over 1,000 miles away. He also has a disabled wife who can have a health emergency at any moment.
The problem: The hospital keeps denying him insurance medical transportation despite the benefit being funded by Medicaid and contracting with the state he lives in. As far as we can tell, he is perfectly within his rights to request insurance medical transportation. Both times he has been denied (again, by the hospital, not the insurance) hit has been because he was under anesthesia. Once was for what more or less amounted to an invasive laparoscopic surgery for what was basically a "liver cleaning" due to a genetic disease, and once he could not go to a different, local hospital for a colonoscopy because, guess what, anesthesia.
My understanding: The hospital has a "you can only leave with friends and family" policy, which seems to be a CYA. Patients under anesthesia, you don't want them passing out in the back of a strange Uber or Taxi, on worse yet, on a city bus. Fine, I understand that. But this is a service contracted through Medicaid, which he is able to receive, and it is contracted with the state he lives in.
My question: Is there any legal justification for the hospital denying him insurance medical transportation, given a) it is contracted through his insurance company with the state he lives in, and b) it is a medical benefit that comes with his Medicaid? And c) the hospital is five minutes away by car, and they are also not offering him their own medical transport. The first hospital I referenced was over an hour away.
If so, what is the justification? If not, who is the best person for him to talk to?
The problem: The hospital keeps denying him insurance medical transportation despite the benefit being funded by Medicaid and contracting with the state he lives in. As far as we can tell, he is perfectly within his rights to request insurance medical transportation. Both times he has been denied (again, by the hospital, not the insurance) hit has been because he was under anesthesia. Once was for what more or less amounted to an invasive laparoscopic surgery for what was basically a "liver cleaning" due to a genetic disease, and once he could not go to a different, local hospital for a colonoscopy because, guess what, anesthesia.
My understanding: The hospital has a "you can only leave with friends and family" policy, which seems to be a CYA. Patients under anesthesia, you don't want them passing out in the back of a strange Uber or Taxi, on worse yet, on a city bus. Fine, I understand that. But this is a service contracted through Medicaid, which he is able to receive, and it is contracted with the state he lives in.
My question: Is there any legal justification for the hospital denying him insurance medical transportation, given a) it is contracted through his insurance company with the state he lives in, and b) it is a medical benefit that comes with his Medicaid? And c) the hospital is five minutes away by car, and they are also not offering him their own medical transport. The first hospital I referenced was over an hour away.
If so, what is the justification? If not, who is the best person for him to talk to?