• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Horse dewormer study

snakestretcher said:
This 'research' is inconclusive. You know that. See also above.
Click to expand...

Medical research is very seldom conclusive. And anything funded by the drug industry or its friends the CDC, NIAID, etc., is likely to be deceptive.

Only someone who has done scientific research can understand how tricky it is, and how it can be used to deceive. The general public thinks you insert a question and out pops a conclusive answer.
 
Good4Nothin said:
You obviously know nothing about doing science. If this study were useless, they would not have bothered doing it.
Click to expand...
What are you talking about? Studies are done that don't pan out all the time.
 
Good4Nothin said:
This one panned out, as you would know if you read it.
Click to expand...
But it didn't actually, as the researchers that conducted the study don't agree with your assessment of it. What is the point in being intellectually dishonest?
 
Good4Nothin said:
Medical research is very seldom conclusive. And anything funded by the drug industry or its friends the CDC, NIAID, etc., is likely to be deceptive.

Only someone who has done scientific research can understand how tricky it is, and how it can be used to deceive. The general public thinks you insert a question and out pops a conclusive answer.
Click to expand...

Still a failure.

🤣
 
ALiberalModerate said:
But it didn't actually, as the researchers that conducted the study don't agree with your assessment of it. What is the point in being intellectually dishonest?
Click to expand...

They said it wasn't conclusive. As I explained, most medical research is NOT conclusive.
 
Good4Nothin said:
You obviously know nothing about doing science. If this study were useless, they would not have bothered doing it.

RCTs are very very often defective or deceptive. The drug industry didn't want ivermectin to be used, so they funded fake research to show what they want. This happens all the time.
Click to expand...
People do useless studies all the time.
 
Good4Nothin said:
Medical research is very seldom conclusive. And anything funded by the drug industry or its friends the CDC, NIAID, etc., is likely to be deceptive.

Only someone who has done scientific research can understand how tricky it is, and how it can be used to deceive. The general public thinks you insert a question and out pops a conclusive answer.
Click to expand...
As this one is being used to try to deceive people into believing that IVM works against Covid? The sad part is that it isn't even the actual researchers trying to use it to deceive.
 
Good4Nothin said:
This one panned out, as you would know if you read it.
Click to expand...
Seriously, how does it feel to be wrong about everything all the time?

I mean, are you immune to being embarrassed now, or can you just not perceive your arguments have been utterly destroyed?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom