billybobama
Member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2007
- Messages
- 105
- Reaction score
- 2
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Is Mitt Romney another Republican Homosexual Pedophile?
Moderator's Warning: |
![]() |
So your saying that certain people are born with a gun pointed to their head with someone yelling at them to receive it up the *** like a bitch,instead of the ability to choose whom they want to have sex with?
Willfully engaging in sex with a chosen partner is not the same a race.You can control whether or not you have sex and with who you have sex with,you can not control the color of your skin.
Quite right. Children were often punished right up to the 60s in schools for using their left hand to write with. Why? Because the bible said that Jesus was on God's right hand side -thus the devil was on the left.
Our sexuality is either intrinsic, a product of the environment,or some combination of the two. I say it is either intrinsic or of such very strong potential that it might as well be intrinsic.
Interactions between two people can be harmful, or not harmful, and of course with varying degrees of harm. THis is what our legal system is all about, isn't it?
There is certainly nothing inherently harmful about homosexuality. The social mores against homosexuality are nothing more than conventions passed down the generations and accepted without any thought as to why it is a taboo. These prejudicescan just aseasily be geared towards left handed people redheads, as there is justification whatsoever for any prejudice based upon actions since the actions are not intrinsically harmful.
Is this a civil rights issue? You bet it is. People are being denied equal rights based upon nothing more signifigant than an old taboo. Should we also single out left handers? Some societies have, and for the same reasons-- it was something different, only occured in a small percentage of the population and was therefore feared due to its difference. There was no harm in being left handed, certainly, but that did not stop the prejudice.
I don't buy the argument that marriage has always been defined as being between a man and a woman, and so we must continueto view it so. If we upheld social conventions based solely on the fact they were established conventions, women would not be voting today, marriages would be arranged, and we would be adhering too any manner of mores whether or not they made sense or had anything to do with people harming one another.
Make sure not to wear those white pumps before Memorial day, now, ya hear. It's a rule.
Homosexuals should have the same rights as heterosexuals, and that includes marrying the person they love. If that notion sends some people into paroxisms of hate, perhaps they should look inside themselves and ask why they are reacting so strongly to something that harms no one and really isn't so very different than anything they are doing themselves.
Wow now that is a new one.........I am a child of the fifties and have never heard that one.....
It is not the same because you have a choice in who and what you want to Fu<k or get fu<ked by...
Americans of African decent do not have a choice in having darker skin.
Used to happen a lot in strict Catholic schools. A friend of mine's father had it happen to him, and I've heard it from a couple of other people.
LeftyHenry
Grow a pair of balls already you sissy...
You "thank" some moron for wondering about a completely obvious and relevant question...this is par for the course with you. :lol:
Unless you are able to act mature and "Intelligent" (which I know is a stretch) then we are done kiddo!
Originally Posted by LeftyHenry
where the **** did you pop out of bitch?
And the thank was because Jamesrage's post isn't something that can be responded to. Frankly, I did not even understand it. Out of no where he just says gays have guns pointed to their heads
Tell that to Michael Jackson. :lol:
You're a sensitive tulip
:lol: I think that he has been here since the beginning.
So you thanked somebody for something that you did not even understand? THAT is your response? 1069 thanks you for this brilliant defense? :rofl
LeftyHenry
where the **** did you pop out of bitch?
And the thank was because Jamesrage's post isn't something that can be responded to. Frankly, I did not even understand it. Out of no where he just says gays have guns pointed to their heads
yes trolling as usually and not contributing at all to the back and forth James and I were having
Originally Posted by BodiSatva
Is there a difference between Homosexual couple using a fertility clinic to have a baby versus a heterosexual couple? I heard Michael Savage go off on that point against some lady and he acted as if that was a valid debate point. Like heterosexuals were allowed to because at least there would be opposite sex parents and that made it OK. I think that his argument was weak *** crap. But that is just me. What do y'all think?
Originally Posted by billybobama
To get to the original question. A Pulitzer Prize winning black OP/ED Columnist named Pitts, I believe for the Washington Post, has clearly written that Homosexuals should certainly piggy-back on the back of the Civil Rights Movement. Now I see Pitts as more credible than anybody else in this forum.
Thank you for putting it into context. As usual, I meant no offense by my comments...I just don't mix Alcohol and Internet very well. :2razz: I come out to post one or two for a few minutes and I start going off for no reason...I apologize for that.
I started playing ping pong soon after.
To All:
Is there a difference between Homosexual couple using a fertility clinic to have a baby versus a heterosexual couple? I heard Michael Savage go off on that point against some lady and he acted as if that was a valid debate point. Like heterosexuals were allowed to because at least there would be opposite sex parents and that made it OK. I think that his argument was weak *** crap. But that is just me. What do y'all think?
More "credible" :lol: How so? He wrote a book? Pulitzer Prizes go out to all sorts of writers. It does not indicate that he is an expert, just that he wrote a good book. I bet that there are people here with more real life experience than Pitt has regarding this subject and that would make them MUCH MORE credible than Pitt. If you want to just rip on people here and say that they don't know what they are talking about, explain why. Show some evidence. To just stop by and make some lame-*** comment is WEAK.![]()
Lastly..."you people"? :