- Joined
- May 1, 2015
- Messages
- 7,802
- Reaction score
- 1,610
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
This article was written nearly a year ago. Why'd you post it now?
This article was written nearly a year ago. Why'd you post it now?
**** them and there idiotic ideas.
This has nothing to do with Trump, so how about you contribute to the discussion instead of derailing?Cause it a slow bigot day.. so have to find new stuff to distract from Trump and his anti-Semitic cases and possible pedophile case. He has after been accused of multiple rapes of a 13 year old.
This has nothing to do with Trump, so how about you contribute to the discussion instead of derailing?
No it didn't.Lets be fair here.. this started out as a derailed thread
Cause it a slow bigot day.. so have to find new stuff to distract from Trump and his anti-Semitic cases and possible pedophile case. He has after been accused of multiple rapes of a 13 year old.
No it didn't.
No, what I am saying is stop trying to derail and speak to the provided article and what it contains.So you are saying ...
Cause it a slow bigot day.. so have to find new stuff to distract from Trump and his anti-Semitic cases and possible pedophile case. He has after been accused of multiple rapes of a 13 year old.
Lets be fair here.. this started out as a derailed thread
And let me contribute ... ****ing morons... if true, which it most likely is not.
So you are saying that there are "rabid" homosexuals that want to ban mother and father on birth certificates? I find that hard to believe... and if there is, then they are in such a tiny minority that they are irrelevant and hence this thread belongs in the Conspiracy theory or "on the lighter side".
**** them and there idiotic ideas.
This has nothing to do with Trump, so how about you contribute to the discussion instead of derailing?
This article was written nearly a year ago. Why'd you post it now?
I'm guessing you don't start threads saying "white men want X,Y,Z" whenever a handful of white men do something together....
cookoo cookoo. this wasn't just some guys, this was sponsored legislation by people in a position of power
oh so by that train of thought that magically changings facts . . .
wasnt it alabama that just last year or two they were trying to decided whether to ban interracial marriage again? it was sponsored by people in position of power. So are you claiming that it would be accurate to say Alabamians want interracial marriage to be illegal? or again according to the logic you just displayed, (even though this was in texas you say it taints the whole group) since they were republican i could say Republicans dont want interracial marriage to be legal. RIght?
Tell us that cool cookoo line again and let the excuse train start how this is "magically" different
the title is either WRONG or by your logic its just fine to say republicans dont want interracial marriage to be legal and disagreeing with that is "cookoo"
opcorn2:
There is an organized militant homosexual lobby. Brazil is the canary in the coalmine. The homosexual agenda hasn't been stopped before because cultural conservatives acted with too little, too late. I remember that the Defense of Marriage Act was a "sop" to conservatives that wanted a Defense of Marriage Constitutional Amendment.
iLOLThe anti-gay sentiment in this thread is real ****ing disturbing.