• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Homo Crystal meth abuse epidemic

Libertarian

Banned
Joined
Jun 14, 2005
Messages
220
Reaction score
0
Now I can lecture you in epidemiology and retrorviral replication modes and give you a lecture on cellular geometry of the rectal versus vaginal mucosa so you would understand why heterosexual behavior is an incredibly poor viral modulator compared to insertive/receptive rectal sex, but until then, one of the things you must understand is the bewildering amount of immunosuppressive things that homosexual males experience which is an HIV modulator.

There is a remarkble amount of drug abuse that takes place in the male homosexual community. Crystal methamphetamines is one of them. Homosexual code for crystal meth abuse is "Tina", as in Tina friendly". "PnP" is another homosexual code word for "Party n Play, meaning abuse drugs then have sex.

Here's an article from the mouths of homosexual themslves admitting it:http://www.hivstopswithme.org/contributor_article.aspx?t=EN&l=home&c=troix&id=9

Next I am going to find and reprint here a bunch of homosexual drug abuser personal ads looking for anonymous homosexual sex parnters who are willing to abuse crystal meth with the prospective partners.

I know where to find the ads because I study the ways of my political adversaries.
 

JustineCredible

Wading through the Mire
DP Veteran
Joined
May 30, 2005
Messages
1,379
Reaction score
91
Location
Eastern Standard Time zone
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Liberal
Lib;

You've got a real problem the least of which are gays looking for equal access to rights. I'd contact a mental health professional about that ocd thing you have going on.

I've noticed that even though your screenname/user name says "Libertarian" your views are fanatically right-wing extremist. You've started your oneman hate campaign and it's scary, dude. Get some help.
 

Libertarian

Banned
Joined
Jun 14, 2005
Messages
220
Reaction score
0
JustineCredible the homophile is using the tactic called "Jamming" strategized and espoused in the Homosexual Agenda I just posted.

Readers notice how homosexual political extremists go out of their way to not address issues?

Not once did she address the rampant drug abuse problem the male homosexual community has, and how it acts as a homosexual male immunosupressive HIV seroconversion modulator.

Now why do you suppose she avoids the issue?
 
Last edited:

JustineCredible

Wading through the Mire
DP Veteran
Joined
May 30, 2005
Messages
1,379
Reaction score
91
Location
Eastern Standard Time zone
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Liberal
Libertarian said:
Justine the homophile is using the tactic called "Jamming" espoused in the Homosexual Agenda I just posted.
It's MISS JUSTINE THE HOMOSEXUAL to you!

Your hate is only a tactic to sway attention from the real issues. All you're doing is posting hate propaganda. Should we start posting the abuses which plague the heterosexual lifestyle in counter defence? No. Its not an issue.

The issues here are really simple, GAY MARRIAGE...PLEASE stick to those.
 

Libertarian

Banned
Joined
Jun 14, 2005
Messages
220
Reaction score
0
You're still "Jamming".

Either substantively reply to the topic or start a new one.
 

JustineCredible

Wading through the Mire
DP Veteran
Joined
May 30, 2005
Messages
1,379
Reaction score
91
Location
Eastern Standard Time zone
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Liberal
Libertarian said:
You're still "Jamming".

Either substantively reply to the topic or start a new one.

Your thread is only a Ad Hominem attack and is completely OFF TOPIC.

The forum is on GAY MARRIAGE, it's not your soapbox for Gay Bashing.
:soap
 

Libertarian

Banned
Joined
Jun 14, 2005
Messages
220
Reaction score
0
Would you say then all the aricles written by homosexual males admitting the crystal meth and other drug abuse epidemic in the male homosexual community are all engaging in ad hominem attacks...on...themsleves!?



Lol, you homosexual political extremists crack me up......
 
Last edited:

Libertarian

Banned
Joined
Jun 14, 2005
Messages
220
Reaction score
0
here are the personal ads patially adding evidence to the rampant drug abuse epidemic in the male homosexual community that immunosupresses and synergizes HIV seroconversions that I mentioned.

Mods, I think I have diligently obliterated certain complete words, let me know if my conscientious attempts are not good enough:

2guys want to host a wild wet pnp kink party.raw
-----------------------------------------------------------

here's an ad from two HIV seropositve males wanting to engage in unprotected sex and drug abuse with others:

2 of us here in eagle rock looking for raw bb pnp fun with guys for same.
you be attractive and full of wet and raw talk and the equipment to do it with.
1-white 34, 155, 6'1, smooth swimmers, 7 cut, poz, vers- bottom, into wild wet and dirty talk, toys vids, ff, etc
1-latin 5'7, 35, 150, smooth, and 8 uncut, poz, versatile, also into wild scenes. both good looking and wanting company.Must want to travel.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

- 32
1. find a hot, outdoor place for an all out f...kfest
2. make fast cash by ???
or
3. also have a large collection of dvd porn for sale (10 DOLLARS EACH)
what can you offer?
2 HOTTIES PNP IN THE HILLS
---------------------------------

husky jock type looking to be a f..k toy for a group. Love slings, tag teams, maybe blind folds. Looking to have fun. LOVE POPPERS....420 is cool....other pnp I am open minded to. Not into domniation...only hole appreciation.

38, 6'/ 220 white, bld/blue round white shaved b..tt. Smooth pink h..e that likes to be stretched and then painted white. Want to be fe.ched also.
Love slender smooth guys.....but open minded.
------------------------------------

Im a cute bottom boy who loves to pnp and s..k all types of c..k for hours, i have a top denture i love to take out when i s..k.. to really get down and nasty and s..k you off good also into BB .love to be f..ked one on one or im into group scenes Hard Rough Raw and nasty. Idont have a picture and you dont need one either just give me your c..k in both my h..es.
LOOKING FOR NOW OR THIS WEEKEND
--------------------------------------------

Im so over all the flaky queens around here. i want to meet one decent, sweet, masculine guy who is into sunsts, cuddling, madonna, motherload, hot makeout session, nude beaches, palm springs, white parties, T, the design center & MUCH MUCH MORE.....
im NOT! your typical weho guy. when you meet me, you would never guess that im actually a c.m hungry p..sy pig.
I LOVE, LOVE,LOVE,LOVE C.M..........LOVE IT! pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnppnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp pnp
c.m on my face, c.m in my hair, c.m in my moth, c.m in my b..tt h.le, c.m c.m c.m c.m c.m and more C.M.............oh my, i love it soooooooooooooooo much.
 
Last edited:

shuamort

Pundit-licious
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Messages
7,297
Reaction score
1,000
Location
Saint Paul, MN
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent

Libertarian

Banned
Joined
Jun 14, 2005
Messages
220
Reaction score
0
shuamort,

I actually have no issues with drug abuse to a degree. As an example, if people want to get high from tetrahydracannabinol, or lysergic acid diethylamine and other relatively harmless, non-addictive drugs, who cares. They are usually not hurting anyone and usually not hurting themselves.

BUT, the illegal componant of illicit drugs, of which I favor legalizing just about all of them, would remove the rampant crime that criminalizing them generates. Legalizing drugs so Darwins theory of natural selection could weed some of them and potentially would help refine the gene pool.

Prohibition didn't stop drunk driving or drugs, criminalizing prostitution didn't stop women providing phsyically beneficial pleasure, and criminalizing drugs hasn't worked, it has just created a vast criminal, violent thieving network. It has been a total and complete abject failure and waste of time and taxpayer$

Does that clarify my position?

I am a little surprised you brought up that argument, as I thought I had been quite clear what my motive for exposing homosexual politics and propaganda. But for those suffering from terminal attention deficit disorder, here it is again:

One of the ways males homosexuals synergize the successful seroconversion of retroviruses like GRIDS-Gay related Immune Deficiency Syndrome, or HTLV-Human T cell Lymphotrohpic Virus is to immunosuppress themselves. They do this via a bewildering rate of STD transmission, which additionally can provide a structural defect in the otherwise effective viral barrier intact oral mucosa is as well as the really efficient skin barrier.

These behaviors are not engaged in in remotely equal rates by heterosexuals, which lends another blow to the propaganda homosexual extremist AIDS activists engage ("anyone can get it", "it's not just a gay disease anymore", "aids doesn't discriminate", "ad nauseum")in by using lies and fearmongering targeting heterosexuals as a means of extorting AIDS $ that the self labeled "Pink Mafia" receive and control.

The money would be better spent on cancer research, although there has been a great offshoot benefit in viral research.
 

shuamort

Pundit-licious
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Messages
7,297
Reaction score
1,000
Location
Saint Paul, MN
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Libertarian said:
These behaviors are not engaged in in remotely equal rates by heterosexuals, which lends another blow to the propaganda homosexual extremist AIDS activists engage ("anyone can get it", "it's not just a gay disease anymore", "aids doesn't discriminate", "ad nauseum")in by using lies and fearmongering targeting heterosexuals as a means of extorting AIDS $ that the self labeled "Pink Mafia" receive and control.
Unless Africa has gone gay (and that wasn't part of the agenda) then it's pretty obvious that the pandemic that's happening there isn't a "gay disease". Wouldn't you agree?
Libertarian said:
The money would be better spent on cancer research, although there has been a great offshoot benefit in viral research.
Yeah, and if people stopped smoking, we might have less cancer to deal with. If people stopped having sex, we wouldn't have to worry about AIDS being spread. If people stayed out of the sun, we wouldn't have to worry about skin cancer as much. See where I'm going here? Life has risks. Lots of them. If people want to expose themselves to risks, they should be allowed to do that (assuming that they don't affect anyone else).
 

Libertarian

Banned
Joined
Jun 14, 2005
Messages
220
Reaction score
0
shuamort said:
Unless Africa has gone gay (and that wasn't part of the agenda) then it's pretty obvious that the pandemic that's happening there isn't a "gay disease". Wouldn't you agree?
Readers, this is the homosexual extremist AIDS activists scripted propaganda tactic designed to democratize the overwhelmingly homosexual male disease so as to garner more money and it is designed to deflect the growing realization that there is no American heterosexual AIDS epidemic. The latter truth is even evidenced by the CDC, who by the way has publically admitted the heterosexual AIDS risks, and I have the official and date he said it for the ignorant types. The tactic created by homosexual AIDS strategists is called the "But What About Africa" tactic.

Now I can annihilate the "But What About Africa" propaganda trick by showing EXACTLY how the African epidemiological model is quite different, and why, but that should be a separate topic.

Interesting though how he would even bring it up in of all places the U.S........the tactic is a version of the RedCoats Are Coming...

Yeah, and if people stopped smoking, we might have less cancer to deal with.
I knew he would bring up other potentially detrimental behaviors, it is another common tactic of homophile AIDS extremists. Let me toy with them as I am used to that tactic.

The smoking analogy is false logic because as you admitted, there is a higher health insurance premium for smokers. You pre-emptively gutted your own argument in advance, then tried to remake it. Interesting.....

If people stopped having sex, we wouldn't have to worry about AIDS being spread.
If heterosexuals in teh U.S continue to have sex the way they have primarily have always, they don't have to really worry about AIDS either. As a homosexual agenda AIDS activist you clearly are either hding the findings of the ultimate study of serodiscordant heterosexual intercourse seroconversion rates performed by Chief Epidemiologist at UCSF Nancy Padian et al, or its conclusions are fatally ruinous to your fearmongering heterosexaul AIDS risk distortions.

If people stayed out of the sun, we wouldn't have to worry about skin cancer as much. See where I'm going here?
Life has risks. Lots of them. If people want to expose themselves to risks, they should be allowed to do that (assuming that they don't affect anyone else).[/QUOTE]

I knew where you would go before even you did, don't you think I have not interacted with hundreds of homosexual AIDS activists before you? Your arguments are well known as they are scripted and they are repetitive.

Back to your first point, there comes a time when you can act upon risks unrationally. People regularly engage in all sorts of risks, it is part of life. There is in fact a risk that heterosexuals can HIV seroconvert from heterosexual sex.....this risk is about three times greater then being struck by lightning.

You can be killed driving your car, and far more heterosexuals will die from this....the issue is about having accurate information of all risks, and then taking measures proportionate to the relative rates of those risks balanced by effeciency and convenience.

As an example, heterosexuals are far more likely to be killed or injured in a car accident driving to and from a swingers club group orgy then if they never used a condom at such. Heterosexuals are far more likely to save their own lives by wearing a crash helmet while driving then they are if they use condoms.

As to the behaviors you mentioned, none of them remotely come close to the approximate 20% seropositivity levels of 20 year old male homosexuals, or the 50% seroposivity national levels of 50 year old male homosexuals, or the 70% overall seroposivity levels of male homosexuals in areas area like L.A., S.F. and N.Y.

To equate the two remarkably disparate risk behaviors and hold them as analogous risks is a disingenuous false analogy, and you know it.
 

Urethra Franklin

Folle
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Messages
3,579
Reaction score
979
Location
European Union
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Libertarian said:
Now I can lecture you in epidemiology and retrorviral replication modes and give you a lecture on cellular geometry of the rectal versus vaginal mucosa so you would understand why heterosexual behavior is an incredibly poor viral modulator compared to insertive/receptive rectal sex, but until then, one of the things you must understand is the bewildering amount of immunosuppressive things that homosexual males experience which is an HIV modulator.

There is a remarkble amount of drug abuse that takes place in the male homosexual community. Crystal methamphetamines is one of them. Homosexual code for crystal meth abuse is "Tina", as in Tina friendly". "PnP" is another homosexual code word for "Party n Play, meaning abuse drugs then have sex.

Here's an article from the mouths of homosexual themslves admitting it:http://www.hivstopswithme.org/contributor_article.aspx?t=EN&l=home&c=troix&id=9

Next I am going to find and reprint here a bunch of homosexual drug abuser personal ads looking for anonymous homosexual sex parnters who are willing to abuse crystal meth with the prospective partners.

I know where to find the ads because I study the ways of my political adversaries.
And I'd be a rich woman if I had a euro for every "straight" guy I've had to inform that I don't do anal.
And straight clubs are just as awash with drugs. I'd say open your eyes, but you clearly don't want to.

Funny you have to justify that you know where to find these ads. Defensive even before any attack. I used to think you were just full of hate, but now I think it's obvious that those who accused you of being a closet case were right. It's really sad. Was it religion that stopped you accepting your feelings? A bigoted father? Tragic that you spew out this crap, when all you need is a big strong man to hug you and make you feel worthy. Are there no greayhounds from your town to San Francisco?
 

Naughty Nurse

DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 5, 2005
Messages
1,972
Reaction score
12
Location
The UK
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Liberal
Libertarian said:
Readers, this is the homosexual extremist AIDS activists scripted propaganda tactic blah blah blah
Grow up. Get a life. Get a bf.
 

teacher

DP Veteran
Joined
May 20, 2005
Messages
5,980
Reaction score
30
Location
Nomad.Got a couch,beer,meat,cute daughters,Batman
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Libertarian.
Correct me if I'm wrong but your not much of a libertarian are you. The basic premise of libertarianism is if it don't interfere with someone else's life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, violates someone else's rights or safety ect. then make no law about it. So what if gays want to bugger each other. As a good libertarian you should be saying "bugger away my slightly off kilter brothers".
 

Schweddy

Benevolent Dictator
Administrator
DP Veteran
Joined
May 19, 2004
Messages
11,971
Reaction score
6,080
Location
Plano, TX
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
Lib,

I agree with some of your ideas, but I have to hand it to JustineCredible. This forum is about Gay Marriage and rights. If you wish to attack the homosexual community THIS IS NOT THE PLACE. The African AIDS eppidemic & drug issues here in the US are real ones and deserve true and open discussion.

I know that you are very intersted in this topic, but it is bordering on disruptive. Please stick to the topic. We are very very patient around here as I am sure this has proven. No this is not a homosexual agenda response - I am very straight. We want everyone here to be welcome.

I know that you use proxies as a deterant to being banned, but I respectfully ask you to understand that this is a sensative issue and there are other places on the net for such slander.
 

Libertarian

Banned
Joined
Jun 14, 2005
Messages
220
Reaction score
0
Are you suggesting that I am not discussing the African epidemiological model truthfully, when I haven't even layed out the African epidemiological model yet and even stated in declining that to keep on topic it would need its own topic?!

As to discussing drug issues, truthfully, are you suggesting that I have not been discussing homosexual drug abuse truthfully?! Are you going so far as to suggest when I posted links and texts from homosexual writers raising awareness about that problem, as well as immunological suppressive issues associated with seroconversion, both they and myself were not being truthful?!

"Slander"? uh-huh......but when I am personally attacked and called a homosexual, is that your definition of truthful posting and the "welcoming" you refer to?!...lol....

Where would you suggest I create the topics I have?


Thought so
 
Last edited:

shuamort

Pundit-licious
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Messages
7,297
Reaction score
1,000
Location
Saint Paul, MN
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Libertarian said:
Readers, this is the homosexual extremist AIDS activists scripted propaganda tactic designed to democratize the overwhelmingly homosexual male disease so as to garner more money and it is designed to deflect the growing realization that there is no American heterosexual AIDS epidemic. The latter truth is even evidenced by the CDC, who by the way has publically admitted the heterosexual AIDS risks, and I have the official and date he said it for the ignorant types. The tactic created by homosexual AIDS strategists is called the "But What About Africa" tactic.

Now I can annihilate the "But What About Africa" propaganda trick by showing EXACTLY how the African epidemiological model is quite different, and why, but that should be a separate topic.

Interesting though how he would even bring it up in of all places the U.S........the tactic is a version of the RedCoats Are Coming...
One could say that since it doesn't happen in the US that it doesn't happen anywhere, but when you're claiming causation and ignoring other data, your claims become disingenuous.
HIV/AIDS is not running rampant among the heterosexual community in the United States (although the rate is slowly increasing). The same cannot be said of AIDS cases worldwide. In most of the world, the majority of HIV/AIDS cases are transmitted through heterosexual sex. This is especially true in developing nations, where most of the worlds AIDS cases are located. In this part of the world, HIV/AIDS cases are increasing dramatically.


Libertarian said:
I knew he would bring up other potentially detrimental behaviors, it is another common tactic of homophile AIDS extremists. Let me toy with them as I am used to that tactic.
I speak solely for myself, never for a group of anyone. Feel free to address all your beefs directly with me.

Libertarian said:
The smoking analogy is false logic because as you admitted, there is a higher health insurance premium for smokers. You pre-emptively gutted your own argument in advance, then tried to remake it. Interesting.....
Actually, it buttresses my point. The smokers are (or at least legally should be) consenting adults who are knowingly assuming the risks, and as such, are paying for the risk with higher health insurance costs, taxes on cigarrettes, as well as their lives. But, as the point still stands, it's their choice to do what they want.

Libertarian said:
If heterosexuals in teh U.S continue to have sex the way they have primarily have always, they don't have to really worry about AIDS either. As a homosexual agenda AIDS activist you clearly are either hding the findings of the ultimate study of serodiscordant heterosexual intercourse seroconversion rates performed by Chief Epidemiologist at UCSF Nancy Padian et al, or its conclusions are
Here's the data regarding her study. It shows that without condoms, there is an approximately 25% chance that a person will not contract HIV from there partner. That's still 75%. And HIV infections are still rising, albeit slower, in the US between heterosexuals. So, status quo as you're claiming is still problematic.
Libertarian said:
I knew where you would go before even you did, don't you think I have not interacted with hundreds of homosexual AIDS activists before you? Your arguments are well known as they are scripted and they are repetitive.
I guess you saw that point coming then.

Libertarian said:
Back to your first point, there comes a time when you can act upon risks unrationally. People regularly engage in all sorts of risks, it is part of life. There is in fact a risk that heterosexuals can HIV seroconvert from heterosexual sex.....this risk is about three times greater then being struck by lightning.
3/4 of the times a heterosexual has sex with an infected person and contracts HIV is a bit higher than lightning.

Libertarian said:
You can be killed driving your car, and far more heterosexuals will die from this....the issue is about having accurate information of all risks, and then taking measures proportionate to the relative rates of those risks balanced by effeciency and convenience.
You forgot desire. Effeciency and convenience do not factor into smoking.


Libertarian said:
As an example, heterosexuals are far more likely to be killed or injured in a car accident driving to and from a swingers club group orgy then if they never used a condom at such. Heterosexuals are far more likely to save their own lives by wearing a crash helmet while driving then they are if they use condoms.
That's true currently, of course assuming that no one at those swingers groups are HIV positive. The odds statistically would be higher at the swingers' club.

Libertarian said:
As to the behaviors you mentioned, none of them remotely come close to the approximate 20% seropositivity levels of 20 year old male homosexuals, or the 50% seroposivity national levels of 50 year old male homosexuals, or the 70% overall seroposivity levels of male homosexuals in areas area like L.A., S.F. and N.Y.

To equate the two remarkably disparate risk behaviors and hold them as analogous risks is a disingenuous false analogy, and you know it.
False analogies? I never posited them as completely analogous. (Which is near impossible as analogies go). The point is in the message and not the details. In other words, people know the risk of taking drugs, having sex, smoking, driving, going out in the sun, etc. They choose to engage in these behaviors regardless of the outcome.

Libertarian, it's easy to say "I knew they would say X" AFTER it's been said. Here's a hint for credibility, if you know the argument is coming, address it in your post!
 

Schweddy

Benevolent Dictator
Administrator
DP Veteran
Joined
May 19, 2004
Messages
11,971
Reaction score
6,080
Location
Plano, TX
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
Libertarian said:
Are you suggesting that I am not discussing the African epidemiological model truthfully, when I haven't even layed out the African epidemiological model yet and even stated in declining that to keep on topic it would need its own topic?

...

Where would you suggest I create the topics I have?


Thought so
This was not meant to be a slam Libertarian post. Of course this thread has turned into a decent thread, but my concerns were that it was being wool skined as a slanderous endeavor against the gay community.

I will bow out - just letting my concerns be voiced.
 

Libertarian

Banned
Joined
Jun 14, 2005
Messages
220
Reaction score
0
Well, now you have us all confused. First you say I am slandering homosexuals, a pretty hefty charge, then suggest I take my opinions elsewhere.....then you suggest my posts are not truthful.

When I request clarification and call you on it, you bow out?!

I think I have just been the victim of a drive by....


Shuamort, your last post is far better representative of the abilities I knew were present, lurking, and beat the previous ad hominems....let me continue to be consistent and respond in kind, AND...suggest that since the thread via me and especially your reply is sort of morphing away from the original topic title, perhaps we should create a new thread so keep things clarified....perhaps "The But What About Africa" cry" The Differing Africa Epidemiological AIDS Model, etc.

As to the cigarette analogy though, it continues to be false, as it seems to have been held up as analogous to detrimental homosexual male behavior in so far as non-smokers and heterosexuals subsidize both with health insurance premiums. The reason why this is false is because smokers are charged higher premiums, homosexual males are not because a law in practice prevents heterosexuals from being able to pay lower premiums because they don't aren't the primary vectors of HIV. Sure both smoking and homosexual male behaviors are chosen.

Keep in mind, I am always talking about our country, the USA...when not, I will state so.....in the meantime, I am off to work....
 
Last edited:

shuamort

Pundit-licious
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Messages
7,297
Reaction score
1,000
Location
Saint Paul, MN
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Libertarian said:
Shuamort, your last post is far better representative of the abilities I knew were present, lurking, and beat the previous ad hominems....let me continue to be consistent and respond in kind, AND...suggest that since the thread via me and especially your reply is sort of morphing away from the original topic title, perhaps we should create a new thread so keep things clarified....perhaps "The But What About Africa" cry" The Differing Africa Epidemiological AIDS Model, etc.

As to the cigarette analogy though, it continues to be false, as it seems to have been held up as analogous to detrimental homosexual male behavior in so far as non-smokers and heterosexuals subsidize both with health insurance premiums. The reason why this is false is because smokers are charged higher premiums, homosexual males are not because a law in practice prevents heterosexuals from being able to pay lower premiums because they don't aren't the primary vectors of HIV. Sure both smoking and homosexual male behaviors are chosen.
Fair enough. Let's disregard all other debates in this thread and focus solely on the "homo Crystal meth abuse epidemic". No HIV, No AIDS, no marriage, no other extraneous topics. Solely crystal meth use by homosexuals.

Now that that's said, what's your issue with consenting adults indulging in crystal meth?
 

JustineCredible

Wading through the Mire
DP Veteran
Joined
May 30, 2005
Messages
1,379
Reaction score
91
Location
Eastern Standard Time zone
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Liberal
Libertarian said:
Well, now you have us all confused. First you say I am slandering homosexuals, a pretty hefty charge, then suggest I take my opinions elsewhere.....then you suggest my posts are not truthful.

When I request clarification and call you on it, you bow out?

I think I have just been the victim of a drive by....
Why am I not suprised at your whiney defence?

You started this thread solely to attack gays. The title says it all. Your initial post furthers that most obvious of ploys by you.
You then kick and shout when you're called on it, whining that I was supposedly "jamming" you.
All the threads you have started have had LITTLE to do with Gay Marriage as so much as Gay-Bashing.
But as soon as you're called on these most obvious of deliberate bashing techniques you cry "jamming" or "Homophile tactics." It's all just too convenient.



Libertarian said:
Shuamort, your last post is far better representative of the abilities I knew were present, lurking, and beat the previous ad hominems....let me continue to be consistent and respond in kind, AND...suggest that since the thread via me and especially your reply is sort of morphing away from the original topic title, perhaps we should create a new thread so keep things clarified....perhaps "The But What About Africa" cry" The Differing Africa Epidemiological AIDS Model, etc.
NOT IN THIS FORUM! FIND A MORE APPROPRIATE PLACE!


Libertarian said:
As to the cigarette analogy though, it continues to be false, as it seems to have been held up as analogous to detrimental homosexual male behavior in so far as non-smokers and heterosexuals subsidize both with health insurance premiums. The reason why this is false is because smokers are charged higher premiums, homosexual males are not because a law in practice prevents heterosexuals from being able to pay lower premiums because they don't aren't the primary vectors of HIV. Sure both smoking and homosexual male behaviors are chosen.

Keep in mind, I am always talking about our country, the USA...when not, I will state so.....in the meantime, I am off to work....

By "off to work" I can only imagine that it must be something to do with scouring gay male personal ads, perusing gay night clubs (trolling) and whatever other lascivious activities you deem to justify as "investigation."

Honey, either you really are just a closeted gay man or you have a real mental health issue.
 

Schweddy

Benevolent Dictator
Administrator
DP Veteran
Joined
May 19, 2004
Messages
11,971
Reaction score
6,080
Location
Plano, TX
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
Well, now you have us all confused. First you say I am slandering homosexuals, a pretty hefty charge, then suggest I take my opinions elsewhere.....then you suggest my posts are not truthful.

When I request clarification and call you on it, you bow out?

I think I have just been the victim of a drive by....
Purhaps I am in the wrong here, but this is my perception - please correct me if I am indeed wrong. You started out on a tangent about "no worries I use proxies" on your very first post. Not a good first impression from an admin. ;)

Your posts are very angry and targeted toward the homosexual community. What really gets my goat is that some of your claims are with merit and I agree. I can say the sky is green all day long, but you won't believe me until I prove it with evidence. On the other hand, as the admin, I am concerned that your initial statements were a threat.

I read some of the other statements and wonder what your reason is. Sometimes it seems your method is clearly to get everyone here pissed off.
Others, you present it well and under my breath I scream 'absolutely - tell it like it is'. Fortunatly, we have mature posters that attempt to foster those gross statements and refute them or agree. Because this thread has been saved by a few of those posters - I opted to bow out.
 

JustineCredible

Wading through the Mire
DP Veteran
Joined
May 30, 2005
Messages
1,379
Reaction score
91
Location
Eastern Standard Time zone
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Liberal
vauge said:
Purhaps I am in the wrong here, but this is my perception - please correct me if I am indeed wrong. You started out on a tangent about "no worries I use proxies" on your very first post. Not a good first impression from an admin. ;)

Your posts are very angry and targeted toward the homosexual community. What really gets my goat is that some of your claims are with merit and I agree. I can say the sky is green all day long, but you won't believe me until I prove it with evidence. On the other hand, as the admin, I am concerned that your initial statements were a threat.

I read some of the other statements and wonder what your reason is. Sometimes it seems your method is clearly to get everyone here pissed off.
Others, you present it well and under my breath I scream 'absolutely - tell it like it is'. Fortunatly, we have mature posters that attempt to foster those gross statements and refute them or agree. Because this thread has been saved by a few of those posters - I opted to bow out.

What confuses me is why you hadn't picked up on this earlier.
The title of the thread itself uses a monacher which only means to insite anger.
I immediately caught the OP's tone and called him on it, he then whinned "homophile 'jamming'" and was allowed to procede with his slanderous thread.
Sure, Shuamort jumped in and changed the tone of the thread, ie salvaging it from it's original Bashfest, but it doesn't change the fact that indeed the thread was intended by the OP as a deliberate attempt at hate-mongering.

The thread is entitled "Homo Crystal meth abuse epidemic:" Not, "Crystal Meth Epidemic" as would be more accurate, but rather "HOMO Crystal..."
Specifically targeting the gay community above any other.
 
Top Bottom