reflechissez
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2019
- Messages
- 25,184
- Reaction score
- 18,747
- Location
- Wakanda
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Ah, I actually was referring to you there, with respect of course.
So, let me just touch on this:
How do you reconcile the loss of security in owning one's property outright, precluding foreclosure in a personal economic downturn? Can I assume the funds invested would be the 'insurance policy' to pay the mortgage during financial hardship?
There are no "numbers" to run. At different points in life, people have different priorities. Younger people/families are asset-light; priorities are saving (retirement, emergency fund, major purchases), insurance, tuition, etc. The last thing they need is a mortgage made higher by a 15-year term. Having a paid-off house without adequate retirement savings doesn't help. If someone has enough cash flow to do it all, more power to them; I'm agnostic at that point.You know, I can't argue with this in concept.
Without asking you to show your work, can I assume you've run the numbers in test scenarios, showing the numbers actually do work? IOW, this is hard numbers proven, rather than simply conceptual?