• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

History May Explain Why South Africa Doesn’t Want to Condemn Russia’s Invasion

Tigerace117

DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 30, 2016
Messages
81,699
Reaction score
20,403
Location
Chicago
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
“South Africa abstained in a vote in the United Nations General Assembly on the resolution condemning the Russian invasion of the Ukraine, and demanding their withdrawal.

The South African government has explained that it enjoys good relations with both Russia and the Ukraine; hence it abstained in the UN General Assembly vote condemning the Russian invasion.

“To summarise, the ANC remembers who were its allies during the Cold War, and who denounced it as “terrorists”. This has drowned the other considerations. This includes that South Africa, as a small country, depends on the UN charter principles opposing war and invasion to seize territory, and multilateralism to protect it from invasion by a great power.

“ The ANC and the former Soviet Union have a long history together. The first visit by an ANC leader to the Soviet Union was by Josiah Tshangana Gumede, one of the founding members of the ANC, in 1927. His visit was a spin-off of his attendance in Belgium of the League against Imperialism.

After the apartheid regime was banned the ANC in 1960 it received aid from the Soviet Union for its exiled mission in the fight to liberate South Africa from minority white rule. This aid exceeded that from the pan-African Organisation of African Unity- now the African Union - or anyone else.

It was only from the end of the 1970s that Scandinavian donations became higher than Soviet funding. But Scandinavian aid remained limited to peaceful aid only. Only the Soviet Union provided weapons and other military aid to the ANC’s armed wing, Umkhonto we Sizwe.

By 1988, sensing that victory over apartheid was coming, Moscow supplemented training in guerilla warfare with training in conventional warfare, including naval and air force training.

Historical links, such as these, were evident in the divide between African states during the UN General Assembly vote to condemn Russia’s invasion of the Ukraine.

Namibia, which is governed by Swapo, Angola, by the MPLA and Mozambique by Frelimo joined South Africa in abstaining.

Swapo, the MPLA, and Frelimo also received Soviet foreign aid during the 20th Century Cold War when they too were liberation movements fighting guerrilla wars.

By contrast, Botswana and Zambia voted to condemn the Russian invasion. Significantly, their ruling parties came to power peacefully, and did not have Russian alliances. This vote for the UN resolution condemning the Russian invasion and demanding its withdrawal, was also the position of 28 African Union members. Seventeen abstained.

Clearly, the liberation movements of Angola, South Africa, Namibia and Mozambique regard Russia as the inheritor and custodian of the Soviet Union history and traditions.“

Why then do the ANC, Swapo, MPLA, and Frelimo, and the South African Communist Party – the ANC’s governing alliance partner – continue to retain such bonds of deference to Putin’s anti-communist government?

One reason could be that Russia and those southern African governments have shared resentment of the international dominance of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), especially that of the US and the former colonial powers – the UK and French. This is regardless of the sea-change in party politics within the Kremlin.

The relationship between South Africa and the US, especially, has a complex history. Not least because US governments designated ANC leaders fighting the apartheid regime as terrorists. There is also memory of the CIA's unsavoury role in Africa.“


I found this article really interesting, particularly since I hadn’t seen anyone else mentioning it anywhere here. As I said previously, I think people here often make the mistake of equating what people in NATO member countries think with what the world as a whole thinks, and that simply isn’t the case.
 
And in other news;

"Israel, which has emerged as an unlikely mediator between Ukraine and Russia, has not joined the sanctions imposed by the U.S., Britain, European Union and others."


What we really need is a list of countries for, against and neutral. Neutral being akin to chickensh*t.
 
And in other news;

"Israel, which has emerged as an unlikely mediator between Ukraine and Russia, has not joined the sanctions imposed by the U.S., Britain, European Union and others."


What we really need is a list of countries for, against and neutral. Neutral being akin to chickensh*t.

Not real surprising either given Russian support for Syria right next door.

At the end of the day it seems like most of the world really just doesn’t want to get involved, which I suppose is the true sign of being neutral.
 
At the end of the day it seems like most of the world really just doesn’t want to get involved, which I suppose is the true sign of being neutral.
Most of the world pretty strongly condemned Russia. Only a handful of governments are actually neutral or supportive. When it comes to material actions quite frankly most countries simply have more than enough domestic concerns to deal with than a war that it rather far away.
 
Most of the world pretty strongly condemned Russia. Only a handful of governments are actually neutral or supportive. When it comes to material actions quite frankly most countries simply have more than enough domestic concerns to deal with than a war that it rather far away.

I mean, looking at a map


There’s a lot more neutrals than one would assume.
 
Back
Top Bottom