No, it's not wrong. You sourced the article written by Adam Edelman and you quoted one of his lines. If you need to be shown evidence of that, refer to the first post in the thread.
iLOL
You are still absurdly conflating issues in an attempt to deflect from being wrong.
Figures.
Rita Crosby is the source of the information period, not the article. What the author said was his mistaken opinion based on the
previous report and what Rita Crosby provided.
I simply do not understand why you cannot admit to the truth.
iLOL
Your spin is not truth, it is dishonesty.
Even though you have been corrected on your made up false beliefs you still absurdly continue to believe that which you made up to believe.
That is all your own fault. Not mine.
And as already pointed out that isn't likely to change.
Says the person repeatedly posting things which are not true, even when presented with their own words.
iLOL
As already pointed out, it is you who are posting things that are not true.
No, it's not. YOU posted the article, I didn't.
Another absurd reply to what was quoted. Figures, that is clearly all you have.
Again.
You don't believe she would be getting the larger lectern just as I didn't think so either. And even though I pointed that out by question, you still can't accept the reality of that. Or the fact that using a different sized lectern is skewing the optics. Figures.
Do you regularly post articles and quote specific lines in them and tacitly agree to them when you don't agree with them? If so, please point me to other examples of you doing that, I'd be very interested.
Tacitly agree? iLOL
As I said. You are making things up to believe.
The post was about the information provided in the article which camer from Rita Crosby. Not the authors mistaken belief.
My later question shows that I was in disbelief of the authors stated beliefs.
Sorry you can't accept reality, but those are the facts here, not what you want to make up to believe.
iLOL
You have already been corrected on this. Your made up belief is spin.
Again.
You have been trying to use this to claim partisanship, that is an absurdly ridiculous argument.
Pointing out that I would criticize anyone using a different size lectern, means anyone, not just Clinton, which does not show the partisanship you you made up to believe.
You have not provided any credible evidence. Just like I said.
There was no reason to disbelieve said report nor have you provided one. Did her campaign deny the report? Did the Committee deny the report? What was that? They didn't? Go figure.
And yet you want to sit there and claim it wasn't credible absent evidence that it wasn't.
Hilarious.
The fact alone that Hillary did indeed use the smaller lectern is just further conformation of the report. Do you really not understand that?
You can continue to be wrong all you want, but it doesn't change the fact that Hillary used a smaller lectern which does skew the optics.
The amount of falsehoods in your posts is astounding and I simply do not understand why you continue posting things which can so easily be proven untrue.
Wrong, nor have you proven anything untrue. Clearly you are confused and only speaking of your own dishonest postings, especially with the crap you made up to believe.