uptower
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2018
- Messages
- 20,058
- Reaction score
- 17,143
- Location
- Behind you - run!
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
That's it, I definitely won't vote for her in the next election.
There was separate testimony regarding leaks to the press but I haven't looked into the specifics on that.Did Mook connect the Clinton Campaign to Sussmann taking it to the FBI or was the testimony that it should be put out into the press?
1. She failed to swing the election in her direction.Because it's current news and this news about crooked Hillary came out today while Robby Mook, Clinton's campaign manager testified during the Michael Sussmann trial.
On Halloween 2016, Clinton tweeted, “Computer scientists have apparently uncovered a covert server linking the Trump Organization to a Russian-based bank.”
She lied, attempting to plant a false narrative in order to swing the election in her direction.
Her argument, of course, will be that she had no idea any of the information was contrived and proving that will be a tough hill to climb, probably. That being said, her own guy just tied her to the scheme and that ain't a good look for her or for any of the media that backed her and bashed Trump over this stuff. Will the public care? Some will, some won't and the rest will just go along with whatever their peers say.
Ms. Hillary is one of the untouchables in American society.
The mainstream media will fiercely protect and excuse her, as they do for so many groups in this nation.
So the lady (as well as those mansion-buying ladies of BLM) are NOT shaking in their boots.
They are probably laughing.
In fairness, do we know she lied there? Meaning did she know the info was bullshit?Because it's current news and this news about crooked Hillary came out today while Robby Mook, Clinton's campaign manager testified during the Michael Sussmann trial.
On Halloween 2016, Clinton tweeted, “Computer scientists have apparently uncovered a covert server linking the Trump Organization to a Russian-based bank.”
She lied, attempting to plant a false narrative in order to swing the election in her direction.
Do we have your permission to discuss the CURRENT AND ONGOING trial relating to this matter?If you came to America for the first time and had only Republicans' hatred for Hillary Clinton to work with, you would be completely forgiven for assuming that she won the 2016 election.
Is Hillary Clinton finally on trial?Do we have your permission to discuss the CURRENT AND ONGOING trial relating to this matter?
Leaking to the Press is not illegal. Yesterday Elias said that he would not have taken the info to the FBI.There was separate testimony regarding leaks to the press but I haven't looked into the specifics on that.
Well, if you think that Democrats are still that concerned with protecting Hillary Clinton and the mythology of her 2016 presidential campaign (which, to reiterate yet again, was six years ago)...yes, that would indicate that one of us is living in an information bubble.It's noteworthy than most left leaning news sources are not covering the Sussmann trial at all. As usual, they only report what they want the public to know.
BwaahaahaahaahaaThe Clinton campaign knew that the idiot left would fall for their Russia Russia Russia bullshit (and many of the morons on the left are STILL just blindly regurgitating the same shit over and over and over) and used Russia as their diversion from the content of the Clinton emails as well as in their coordinated attack with the FBI on a political opponent.
Lock the Daily Mail employees up!!!https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...k-communications-campaign-manager-claims.html
This and more came out in trial today.
Jim Baker also testified that he is 100% sure that Sussman told him he was NOT representing any client when he brought the Alfa Bank info to the FBI.
The Clinton revelation isn't important for Sussman as he's only charged with lying to the FBI but Mook dropped direct the link to Hilary right in her lap.
You should be concerned about the FBI being use as a political weapon.Who cares? Why are you still hung up on alleged dirty tricks from a *losing* political campaign for an election that happened 6 years ago?
Is that what is being alleged here? Talk about burying the lede.You should be concerned about the FBI being use as a political weapon.
*GASP*BREAKING NEWS: Michael Dukakis said something naughty about George HW Bush in 1988. Big scoop at 10pm.
I don't think there's any question whatsoever that Sussman was acting on behalf of the campaign. I mean, among other things, he billed the campaign for his time while doing this.Leaking to the Press is not illegal. Yesterday Elias said that he would not have taken the info to the FBI.
If anything this is looking like Sussmann didn't act on behalf of the campaign... in fact his actions led to the NYT killing the story.
I feel like some people should understand what is the issue before discussing the matter. They created a fake narrative, faked data that they then took to the FBI and that launched pretty much all the fake Russian/Trump collusion narrative. With the FBI as bird dog in the hunt.Is that what is being alleged here? Talk about burying the lede.
I feel like most of these right-wing conspiracy rabbit holes assume preexisting knowledge of *other* right-wing conspiracy theories that most of us normies simply do not have.
You would be correct. From a similar article from YahooNews:Her argument, of course, will be that she had no idea any of the information was contrived and proving that will be a tough hill to climb, probably. That being said, her own guy just tied her to the scheme and that ain't a good look for her or for any of the media that backed her and bashed Trump over this stuff. Will the public care? Some will, some won't and the rest will just go along with whatever their peers say.
After learning about the Alfa Bank allegations, the source of which [Robby] Mook, [Clinton’s campaign chief] said was unknown to him, Mook said his “recollection is we [the Clinton campaign] decided to give it to a reporter so the reporter could pin it down more.” He said the Clinton campaign itself did not have sufficient data or expertise to confirm the accuracy of the information itself.
After consulting with Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, Mook said he told Clinton that the campaign wanted to share the Alfa Bank information with the media and “she agreed to that.” One of the main purposes of giving the data to the media was so that a reporter could investigate and try to confirm it, Mook said.
The campaign subsequently did make the information available to Eric Lichtblau, then with the New York Times, as well as a reporter for Slate, an online magazine.
That's okay. Karma got her crooked ass! She will never be president!!!!Ms. Hillary is one of the untouchables in American society.
The mainstream media will fiercely protect and excuse her, as they do for so many groups in this nation.
So the lady (as well as those mansion-buying ladies of BLM) are NOT shaking in their boots.
They are probably laughing.
HRC continues to keep herself in the news, and try to remain relevant. The Russia hoax was pushed by the MSM for 4 years, so, I guess them.Who cares? Why are you still hung up on alleged dirty tricks from a *losing* political campaign for an election that happened 6 years ago?
And Donald Trump didn't know that dozens of people were working on his behalf to overturn the election? Hillary is ancient history now. If they can find a crime to nail her with, we'll have to live with it.I agree... Ms. "wipe it, you mean like with a cloth?" will just play stupid. Of course she knew.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?