• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Hey Martin Supporters... It's time you were educated and enlightened

many conservatives have no heart

thats why l wil never be one of them
 
No, this is more like you tossing out BS so you can try to justify calling the most reasonable storyline BS.

l would still be defending teh victim even if he was white

but not many of you wouldnt defend zimmer...........

l wish l was wrong
 
Professor Bill Whittle at your service...

What a joke this hit piece is, and I am stunned how many have fallen hook ladder and sinker to this bunch of nonsense. Whittle makes Mike Moore seem fair and balanced. Amazing that it wan't enough that a 17 year old teen had to die. Oh no. He must be dragged through the mud to push the agenda of some nut cases who have little value for fact and the truth. Sad and pathetic.

There are so many hole to poke at, but let me just start by saying that according to the autopsy, Trayvon's liver was normal. Of course it's so much easier taking the side of the smear machine than to take 5 minutes out of your day and look for yourself.

 
many conservatives have no heart

thats why l wil never be one of them

IMO, liberals and socialists want sympathy for slackers, criminals, etc. who don't deserve it. You're right that I don't have sympathy for when criminals, thugs, gang members, or anyone fitting a remotely similar description gets killed as a result of their poor decisions.
 
IMO, liberals and socialists want sympathy for slackers, criminals, etc. who don't deserve it. You're right that I don't have sympathy for when criminals, thugs, gang members, or anyone fitting a remotely similar description gets killed as a result of their poor decisions.

if someone follows you will not do anything ?

you will be labelled as ciriminal ?

l think self defense rules work only for whites

conservativism doesnt mean conserving prejudice
 
Why do TM supporters have such a hard time realizing the kid was a wannabe thug?

Because they had the media shoving the cute little innocent boy crap down their throats for months.
 

l would still be defending teh victim even if he was white

but not many of you wouldnt defend zimmer...........

l wish l was wrong

Guess what? I wouldn't. I wanted Casey Anthony to be killed. If TM was white with the same bad history, I'd still defend Z.

The thing that's ridiculous is that so many blacks are blind, see nothing but the end result of a black kid dead from a non-black, and don't give a rat's *** about whether it was the punk's choices that caused it.
 
Because they had the media shoving the cute little innocent boy crap down their throats for months.

and many others like to keep discussing it
 
if someone follows you will not do anything ?

you will be labelled as ciriminal ?

l think self defense rules work only for whites

conservativism doesnt mean conserving prejudice

Well you would be wrong again. Nothing new here...

The jury clearly believed that Scott was in fear for his life when he defended himself, and all the second-guessing and carping about him being a wannabe cop went either unmentioned, or unheeded. Absent more information that the state, with all its resources, was not able to cobble together a case to the satisfaction of the jury, I believe that Cervini’s death is one of the possible outcomes of a young man being out screwing around when he shouldn’t have been. - Black Man Shoots White Teen, Jury says Self Defense. And Nobody Cares | The Truth About GunsThe Truth About Guns

Well start defending.
 
Well you would be wrong again. Nothing new here...

The jury clearly believed that Scott was in fear for his life when he defended himself, and all the second-guessing and carping about him being a wannabe cop went either unmentioned, or unheeded. Absent more information that the state, with all its resources, was not able to cobble together a case to the satisfaction of the jury, I believe that Cervini’s death is one of the possible outcomes of a young man being out screwing around when he shouldn’t have been. - Black Man Shoots White Teen, Jury says Self Defense. And Nobody Cares | The Truth About GunsThe Truth About Guns

l defend every victim ,i love all colors

:2brickwal:shrug::shrug::shrug:
 
l defend every victim ,i love all colors

:2brickwal:shrug::shrug::shrug:

Well you have not said squat about this case? Where is the outrage! Why this black guy shot an innocent 17 year old unarmed white kid!
 
Well you have not said squat about this case? Where is the outrage! Why this black guy shot an innocent 17 year old unarmed white kid!

is there any forum dedicated to this case

if so l would make comment of course

you must ask it to yourselves why it is not a popular case,as popular as martin zimemr case

please no need to change the topic

l am neither white american nor black one

l am the one who is objective here
 
What a joke this hit piece is, and I am stunned how many have fallen hook ladder and sinker to this bunch of nonsense. Whittle makes Mike Moore seem fair and balanced. Amazing that it wan't enough that a 17 year old teen had to die. Oh no. He must be dragged through the mud to push the agenda of some nut cases who have little value for fact and the truth. Sad and pathetic.

There are so many hole to poke at, but let me just start by saying that according to the autopsy, Trayvon's liver was normal. Of course it's so much easier taking the side of the smear machine than to take 5 minutes out of your day and look for yourself.

No. On Page 4:

Snip from Autopsy.jpg

http://lawofselfdefense.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/trayvon.martin.autopsy.pdf

I have absolutely no idea if that means what the guy says it means, but it's there.
 
is there any forum dedicated to this case

if so l would make comment of course

you must ask it to yourselves why it is not a popular case,as popular as martin zimemr case

I don't have to ask anything, most of us already know. Because it just another dead white boy, who cares? Certainly not the race baiting media, no sir.

So I guess it's not just for white people after all huh?
 
I don't have to ask anything, most of us already know. Because it just another dead white boy, who cares? Certainly not the race baiting media, no sir.

l am not the one to be asked why

maybe it is because it is usually whites who are known to discriminate the blacks ?
 
l am not the one to be asked why

maybe it is because it is usually whites who are known to discriminate the blacks ?

Or maybe blacks can be as racist as white? What a concept?

You still have not addressed this nonsense...

l think self defense rules work only for whites

conservativism doesnt mean conserving prejudice
- Medusa
 
l am not the one to be asked why

maybe it is because it is usually whites who are known to discriminate the blacks ?

Are you serious right now?
 
Or maybe blacks can be as racist as white? What a concept?

You still have not addressed this nonsense...

l think self defense rules work only for whites

conservativism doesnt mean conserving prejudice
- Medusa


maybe because the whites still discriminate them ?

maybe not by isolating them from the society as they did in 50s

but by stil thinking these blacks were sold to us by their own people adn many of them are lazy and burglar ?

easy way to justify slavery ,discrimination etc
 
maybe because the whites still discriminate them ?

Institutionalized racism is pretty much a dead issue here. -1

maybe not by isolating them from the society as they did in 50s

This is 2013, it is not the 1950's anymore. That was more than 50 years ago. Time to get over it and move on into the future.

but by stil thinking these blacks were sold to us by their own people adn many of them are lazy and burglar ?

That is absolutely ridicules. No one has said that.... but you.

easy way to justify slavery ,discrimination etc

Only for idiots.
 
maybe because the whites still discriminate them ?

maybe not by isolating them from the society as they did in 50s

but by stil thinking these blacks were sold to us by their own people adn many of them are lazy and burglar ?

easy way to justify slavery ,discrimination etc

You really don't know anything about racism in the US, do you?
 
if someone follows you will not do anything ?

I would call the police. I would run home (recall he had lost George for about 4 minutes). I might have knocked on a neighbors door. Apparently, you would go attack the guy following you. One of us will end up dead. One of us much more likely to be alive.
 
No. On Page 4:

View attachment 67150747

http://lawofselfdefense.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/trayvon.martin.autopsy.pdf

I have absolutely no idea if that means what the guy says it means, but it's there.

What is there? That's right, nothing. You have absolutely no idea what it means, and so does pretty much anyone else. So to assume/present that his liver was damaged because of some concocted cocktail is not only misleading, it's also false. Even sadder that not only Martin's family has to deal with his untimely death but they have to see their son's name dragged through the mud to push an agenda. Pathetic.
 
It does. It means he had liver damage. Not yet bad enough to create a diagnosis, but well on the way to cirrhosis

What Causes Fatty Metamorphosis Of The Liver? | LIVESTRONG.COM

No, it does not. :doh

Are you not aware of the pre-existing genetic condition that many African-American have regarding Non-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFL)?

Risk factors

Obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), female gender and hyperlipidaemia are frequently associated with NAFL (Table 2). Most cases of NAFL occur in the fifth and sixth decades of life, although there has been a disturbing increase in the prevalence in children.23 The typical patient profile may need to be adjusted, since NAFL has also been found in males without weight excess or diabetes.5 In a review of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) data, including 12 241 adults, NAFL was more prevalent in men than in women in every age group, was more common in post-menopausal than pre-menopausal women, and was more common in African-Americans and Mexicans than in non-Hispanic whites.24 Thus it seems that the ‘classic’ profile of NAFL needs to be widened.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver: a common manifestation of a metabolic disorder


But hey, don't let that stop you...keep on pushing that thug fallacy, Buck. :applaud
 
Back
Top Bottom