Interview every single person who is applauding Garland. Hell, even use lie detectors. Fire the Deep State.
Yep, quite useful in its descriptive accuracy.What a useful term, Deep State.
Interview every single person who is applauding Garland. Hell, even use lie detectors. Fire the Deep State.
Interview every single person who is applauding Garland. Hell, even use lie detectors. Fire the Deep State.
If that was what I meant, I would have said it...but it's not.In other words, it’s time to start investigating and punishing anyone who has a different political stance than you.
Interview every single person who is applauding Garland. Hell, even use lie detectors. Fire the Deep State.
It might not be what you meant….but it’s what you meant.If that was what I meant, I would have said it...but it's not.
Interview people who are clapping. That's brilliant. What would the lie detectors reveal? False claps?
![]()
I see the corruption in the DOJ and I see all these people applauding the most corrupt person in the DOJ. I want to see corruption rooted out of the DOJ.You have a sick and twisted view of American values. Garland did his best. What you are advocating for is a dictatorship.
Disgusting.![]()
It might not be what you meant….but it’s what you meant.
‘Lock ‘em up’ taken to its logical conclusion.I see the corruption in the DOJ and I see all these people applauding the most corrupt person in the DOJ. I want to see corruption rooted out of the DOJ.
I find it amazing you support this corruption.
Bye.
I would agree with you if I saw the same corruption you do. Just because Trump and Fox say it's so, does not make it so.I see the corruption in the DOJ and I see all these people applauding the most corrupt person in the DOJ. I want to see corruption rooted out of the DOJ.
I find it amazing you support this corruption.
Bye.
Interview every single person who is applauding Garland. Hell, even use lie detectors. Fire the Deep State.
Now you are talking hyperbole and nonsense again.‘Lock ‘em up’ taken to its logical conclusion.
What part of "I see" do you not understand.I would agree with you if I saw the same corruption you do. Just because Trump and Fox say it's so, does not make it so.
Interview every single person who is applauding Garland. Hell, even use lie detectors. Fire the Deep State.
Lol.What part of "I see" do you not understand.
I don't need Trump or Fox to point out the corruption in the DOJ. I see it.
Yes, you said ‘investigate’. Which is a pretty thin cover for ‘interrogate, arrest, put on trial’ which leads to ‘lock em up’.Now you are talking hyperbole and nonsense again.
I didn't say anything about ‘Lock ‘em up’.
Though, if any of the Deep State want to break laws, then yes...lock them up.
I didn't say ‘investigate’ or ‘interrogate, arrest, put on trial’. You just can't give up the hyperbole and nonsense, can you?Yes, you said ‘investigate’. Which is a pretty thin cover for ‘interrogate, arrest, put on trial’ which leads to ‘lock em up’.
But it probably seems more civilized in your mind. I understand - it’s really tough to rationally justify what you want
Interview every single person who is applauding Garland. Hell, even use lie detectors. Fire the Deep State.
No.Zero rational thought on display again and again. You upset he charged Hunter OR Bobby Menedez?
Amazing, but not at all surprising.I see the corruption in the DOJ and I see all these people applauding the most corrupt person in the DOJ. I want to see corruption rooted out of the DOJ.
I find it amazing you support this corruption.
Bye.
Agreed, and frankly, that's a generous reading.However, regarding Hunter, Garland...and Barr before him...slow walked and hid everything about Hunter's crimes until he was forced by a whistleblower to do something. And, even then, he tried to give Hunter a sweetheart deal that got squashed by an honest judge. You see...this is the kind of corruption that Garland is responsible for.
This is what we witnessed with Trump, from his 2016 campaign being spied on with a predicate, to the Mueller investigation wrongly justified with a fabricated 'dossier', through 2 impeachments, and most recently a spate of lawfare cases all based on 'unique legal theories'.In other words, it’s time to start investigating and punishing anyone who has a different political stance than you.
My statements above are what you voted for, and none of it any good.Thanks for reminding us that’s what the county just voted for.
That'd be the next Democrat who takes the office of president, no doubt.Wonder how long you’ll be cheering this on before they get around to investigating you.
The State Department and the DOJ / FBI have grounds for such a review and investigation. Likely the CIA, but that wouldn't have been made public, and probably a number of others.But...my thread isn't even about Garland. It's about the people left behind in the DOJ. The people who applauded him as he left the building.
Interview every single person who is applauding Garland. Hell, even use lie detectors. Fire the Deep State.